Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review.

Vilnius Implantology Center, Kalvariju str. 121-2, LT-08221, Vilnius, Lithuania.
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants (Impact Factor: 1.49). 01/2008; 23(3):449-56.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate available evidence for a difference in the stability of peri-implant tissues between titanium abutments versus gold alloy, zirconium oxide, or aluminum oxide abutments.
Studies were identified by examining several electronic databases and major dental implant, prosthetic, and periodontal journals. To be selected for the preliminary article pool, the article must have been written in the English language and published from 1980 to March 2007. Articles were sorted based on the nature of the study. In vitro studies and literature reviews were excluded. The included articles were clinical, human histology, and animal studies. Case reports, case series, uncontrolled clinical trials, and clinical studies with teeth treated as a control were excluded from the final review.
The initial article pool included 40 articles of which 9 met the inclusion criteria: 3 animal studies, 2 human histological studies, and 4 randomized clinical trials. Soft tissue recession was not accurately measured in the included clinical studies. Assessment of peri-implant tissues around zirconium oxide and titanium abutments was described only in animal and human histologic studies. Due to differences in study types, timing of follow-ups, and outcome variables, meta-analysis could not be performed.
Included studies revealed that titanium abutments did not maintain a higher bone level in comparison to gold alloy, aluminum oxide, or zirconium oxide abutments. However, there is a lack of information about the clinical performance of zirconium oxide and gold alloy abutments as compared to titanium abutments.


Available from: Tomas Linkevicius, Jan 12, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe and characterize the surface topography and cleanliness of CAD/CAM manufactured zirconia abutments after steaming and ultrasonic cleaning. A total of 12 ceramic CAD/CAM implant abutments of various manufacturers were produced and randomly divided into two groups of six samples each (control and test group). Four two-piece hybrid abutments and two one-piece abutments made of zirconium-dioxide were assessed per each group. In the control group, cleaning by steam was performed. The test group underwent an ultrasonic cleaning procedure with acetone, ethyl alcohol and antibacterial solution. Groups were subjected to scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to verify and characterize contaminant chemical characterization non-quantitatively. All zirconia CAD/CAM abutments in the present study displayed production-induced wear particles, debris as well as organic and inorganic contaminants. The abutments of the test group showed reduction of surface contamination after undergoing an ultrasonic cleaning procedure. However, an absolute removal of pollutants could not be achieved. The presence of debris on the transmucosal surface of CAD/CAM zirconia abutments of various manufacturers was confirmed. Within the limits of the study design, the results suggest that a defined ultrasonic cleaning process can be advantageously employed to reduce such debris, thus, supposedly enhancing soft tissue healing. Although the adverse long-term influence of abutment contamination on the biological stability of peri-implant tissues has been evidenced, a standardized and validated polishing and cleaning protocol still has to be implemented.
    The journal of advanced prosthodontics 04/2015; 7(2):151-9. DOI:10.4047/jap.2015.7.2.151 · 0.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Literature 1. Ozkurt Z.,Kazazoglu E: Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont 2010; 19: 64-68. 2. Oliva X, Oliva J, Oliva JD: Full-mouth oral rehabilitation in a titanium allergy patient using zirconium oxide dental implants and zirconium oxide restorations. A case report from an ongoing clinical study. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010; 5: 190-203. 3. Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Navarro JM, Jr., Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G, Thompson VP, Silva NR: Reliability and failure modes of implant-supported Y-TZP and MCR three-unit bridges. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 235-243. 4. Abbo B, Razzoog ME, Vivas J, Sierraalta M: Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 25-29. 5. Jemt T: Customized titanium single-implant abutments: 2-year follow-up pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 312-316. 6. Marchack CB: A custom titanium abutment for the anterior single-tooth implant. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 288-291. 7. Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hammerle CH: Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 802-808.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The soft tissues around dental implants are enlarged compared with the gingiva because of the longer junctional epithelium and the hemidesmosonal attachments are fewer, suggestive of a poorer quality attachment. Inflammatory infiltrates caused by bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface are thought to be one of the factors causing epithelial downgrowth and subsequent peri-implant bone loss. Gold alloys and dental ceramics as well as the contamination of the implant surface with amino alcohols, appear to promote epithelial downgrowth. Physical manipulaton of the abutment surfaces, including concave abutment designs, platform switching, and microgrooved surfaces are believed to inhibit epithelial downgrowth and minimizes bone loss at the implant shoulder. This paper reviews the factors that are believed to influence the migration of epithelial attachment the dental implant and abutment surfaces. Exploration of innovative computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-based concepts such as “one abutment—one time” and their effect on epithelial downgrowth are discussed. Clinical SignificanceBased on the review of current literature, the authors recommend inserting definitive abutments at the time of surgical uncovering. To implement this concept, registration of the implant position should to be taken at the time of surgical implant placement.
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 04/2014; 26(5). DOI:10.1111/jerd.12097 · 0.84 Impact Factor