Oxygen Hydration Mechanism for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction at Pt and Pd Fuel Cell Catalysts

Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (Impact Factor: 6.69). 02/2011; 2(6). DOI: 10.1021/jz101753e

ABSTRACT We report the reaction pathways and barriers for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on platinum, both for gas phase and in solution, based on quantum mechanics calculations (PBE-DFT) on semi-infinite slabs. We find a new mechanism in solution: O2 → 2Oad (Eact = 0.00 eV), Oad + H2Oad → 2OHad (Eact = 0.50 eV), OHad + Had → H2Oad (Eact = 0.24 eV), in which OHad is formed by the hydration of surface Oad. For the gas phase (hydrophilic phase of Nafion), we find that the favored step for activation of the O2 is Had + O2ad → HOOad (Eact = 0.30 eV) → HOad + Oad (Eact = 0.12 eV) followed by Oad + H2Oad → 2OHad (Eact = 0.23 eV), OHad + Had → H2Oad (Eact = 0.14 eV). This suggests that to improve the efficiency of ORR catalysts, we should focus on decreasing the barrier for Oad hydration while providing hydrophobic conditions for the OH and H2O formation steps.Keywords: DFT; ORR; platinum cathode; fuel cells; PBE; Poisson−Boltzmann solvation

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The oxygen reduction reaction has been studied in the thin-layer flow through cell at polycrystalline platinum in 0.5 M H2SO4 at different flow rates. The apparent transfer coefficient (α′) and the corresponding Tafel slope have been calculated using the previously introduced ac voltammetry method [1, 2]. In addition to the correction of the high electrolyte resistance in the thin-layer cell, the contribution from other adsorption processes presented by the adsorption resistance has been also subtracted. The effect of increasing convection on the obtained α′ and Tafel slopes has been examined and it was found that the apparent cathodic transfer coefficient is 0.5 (corresponding to a Tafel slope of −120 mV dec−1) in all cases independent of the flow rate or frequency, suggesting that the first electron transfer to oxygen is the rate-determining step. The difference between Tafel slopes obtained here, i.e., by ac voltammetrymethod, and that obtained fromusual Tafel slopes is due to the potential dependence of oxygen adsorbates, which in the method used here is—at least in part —separated from the potential dependence of the rate constant.
    Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 06/2013; 17(7):1861-1867. · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report results of quantum mechanics (QM) mechanistic studies of Nafion membrane degradation in a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell. Experiments suggest that Nafion degradation is caused by generation of trace radical species (such as OH(●), H(●)) only when in the presence of H(2), O(2), and Pt. We use density functional theory (DFT) to construct the potential energy surfaces for various plausible reactions involving intermediates that might be formed when Nafion is exposed to H(2) (or H(+)) and O(2) in the presence of the Pt catalyst. We find a barrier of 0.53 eV for OH radical formation from HOOH chemisorbed on Pt(111) and of 0.76 eV from chemisorbed OOH(ad), suggesting that OH might be present during the ORR, particularly when the fuel cell is turned on and off. Based on the QM, we propose two chemical mechanisms for OH radical attack on the Nafion polymer: (1) OH attack on the S-C bond to form H(2)SO(4) plus a carbon radical (barrier: 0.96 eV) followed by decomposition of the carbon radical to form an epoxide (barrier: 1.40 eV). (2) OH attack on H(2) crossover gas to form hydrogen radical (barrier: 0.04 eV), which subsequently attacks a C-F bond to form HF plus carbon radicals (barrier as low as 1.00 eV). This carbon radical can then decompose to form a ketone plus a carbon radical with a barrier of 0.86 eV. The products (HF, OCF(2), SCF(2)) of these proposed mechanisms have all been observed by F NMR in the fuel cell exit gases along with the decrease in pH expected from our mechanism.
    Journal of the American Chemical Society 12/2011; 133(49):19857-63. · 11.44 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014