Prostate-specific antigen screening among young men in the United States

Duke Prostate Center, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.89). 09/2008; 113(6):1315-23. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23667
Source: PubMed


Disagreement exists on the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests for cancer-risk stratification in young men in the United States. Little is known about the use of PSA testing in these men. To understand policy implications of risk stratification, the authors sought to characterize PSA use among young men.
The authors used the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to study prostate-cancer screening in a representative sample of men aged 40 years and older (n = 58,511). The primary outcome was self-report of a PSA test in the previous year.
Among men aged 40 to 49 years, 22.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.5-23.5) reported having had a PSA test in the previous year, compared with 53.7% (95% CI, 52.8-54.7; P < .001) of men aged >or=50 years. When sociodemographic characteristics were statistically controlled, young, black, non-Hispanic men were more likely than young, white, non-Hispanic men to report having had a PSA test in the previous year (odds ratio [OR], 2.42; 95% CI, 1.95-3.01; P < .001). In young men, annual household income >or=USD 35,000 (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.26-1.78; P < .001) and an ongoing relationship with a physician (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.06-3.07; P < .001) were associated with PSA testing.
One-fifth of young men reported having had a PSA test within the previous year. Young, black, non-Hispanic men are more likely than young, white, non-Hispanic men to report having had a PSA test, although screening in this high-risk group remains suboptimal.

Download full-text


Available from: Judd W Moul, Nov 17, 2014
    • "of as protective factor (high SES) is better conceptualized here as a risk factor. PSA testing is more common among high SES men (Nijs et al., 2000; Scales et al., 2008) and this contributes to the evidence that men who have higher SES have higher incidence of PCa but are also more likely to have localized and/or low grade at diagnosis and lower mortality (Rundle et al., 2013). Thus, higher SES may lead to higher medical surveillance and screening, including cancer screening with unclear benefits and clear harms. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite important controversy in its efficacy, prostate cancer (PCa) screening has become widespread. Important socioeconomic screening disparities have been reported. However, trends in PCa screening and social disparities have not been investigated in Switzerland, a high risk country for PCa. We used data from five waves (from 1992-2012) of the population-based Swiss Health Interview Survey to evaluate trends in PCa screening and its association with socioeconomic indicators. We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) adjusting for demographics, health status, and use of healthcare. The study included 12,034 men aged ≥50 years (mean age: 63.9). Between 1992 and 2012, ever use of PCa screening increased from 55.3% to 70.0% and its use within the last two years from 32.6% to 42.4% (p-value<0.05). Income, education, and occupational class were independently associated with PCa screening. PCa screening within the last two years was greater in men with the highest (>$6,000/month) vs. lowest income (≤$2,000) (46.5% vs. 38.7% in 2012, PR for overall period =1.29, 95%CI: 1.13-1.48). These socioeconomic disparities did not significantly change over time. This study shows that about half of Swiss men had performed at least one PCa screening. Men belonging to high socioeconomic status are clearly more frequently screened than those less favored. Given the uncertainty of the usefulness of PCa screening, men, including those with high socioeconomic status, should be clearly informed about benefits and harms of PCa screening, in particular, the adverse effect of over-diagnosis and of associated over-treatment.
    Preventive Medicine 11/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.009 · 3.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Since the early 1990s, men have been receiving prostate specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa), typically annually in men 50 to 75 years, or starting as early as age 40 years in men considered higher risk (e.g., men with family history, African Americans; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012; Dyche, Ness, West, Allareddy, & Konety, 2006; Scales, Antonelli, Curtis, Schulman, & Moul, 2008). In 2012, prevalence data indicated that, across U.S. states, the median percentage of men older than 40 years receiving a PSA test in the previous 2 years was 45% (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A significant proportion of men, ages 50 to 70 years, have, and continue to receive prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests to screen for prostate cancer (PCa). Approximately 70% of men with an elevated PSA level will not subsequently be diagnosed with PCa. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 men with an elevated PSA level who had not been diagnosed with PCa. Uncertainty was prominent in men's reactions to the PSA results, stemming from unanswered questions about the PSA test, PCa risk, and confusion about their management plan. Uncertainty was exacerbated or reduced depending on whether health care providers communicated in lay and empathetic ways, and provided opportunities for question asking. To manage uncertainty, men engaged in information and health care seeking, self-monitoring, and defensive cognition. Results inform strategies for meeting informational needs of men with an elevated PSA and confirm the primary importance of physician communication behavior for open information exchange and uncertainty reduction. © The Author(s) 2015.
    American journal of men's health 05/2015; DOI:10.1177/1557988315584376 · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The analysis and prediction of UHF spread spectrum communications system performance in tactical environments has revealed a great deal of uncertainty relating to the applicability of narrowband propagation models and the effects of terrain irregularity and vegetation on broadband signals. This paper presents an overview of an ongoing Army program utilizing wideband pulse response measurements to characterize ground-to-ground, tactical, UHF spread spectrum propagation channels. Recently acquired experimental data is used to demonstrate the potential of this program for improving available tools for prediction and analysis of tactical UHF spread spectrum systems employing bandwidths of hundreds of MHz.
    IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 10/1982; 32(2). DOI:10.1109/MILCOM.1982.4806008 · 1.98 Impact Factor
Show more