Knowledge transfer with children and adolescents in promoting comfort, health, and safety in technology use: Strategies and opportunities
School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.Work (Impact Factor: 0.52). 10/2012; 43(3):387-97. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1463
Objective: This article presents a review of the current literature on knowledge transfer in the use of technology, amongst children and adolescents.Participants: Researchers, teachers, children, adolescents, and related stakeholders are the targeted users of this paper. Methods: A scoping review and detailed analysis of the review based on ergonomic outcomes of comfort, safety and productivity. Results: The review revealed very few studies addressing the knowledge use and transfer with children or adolescents in this topic area. Current literature on knowledge transfer requires more rigorous evaluation, as well as use of explicit health, occupational and ergonomic outcomes. Conclusions: This paper concludes the need for a call for future research in the area of knowledge transfer to promote healthy and safe use of technology, in the population of children and adolescents.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Their work provides a significant contribution to scholars interested in developing or utilizing scoping reviews by creating a methodological framework that can be built upon for reviewing and disseminating research. Indeed, their approach has been widely applied to scoping reviews covering a range of intervention-based research topics reported in the journal including: work capacity and return-to-work assessments ; knowledge transfer for youth using technology ; and identity formation in relation to occupation . The framework developed by Rumrill, Fitzgerald and Merchant  adds a critical addition to the literature on the systematic review of intervention-based research. "
ABSTRACT: There is increasing theoretical consideration about the use of systematic and scoping reviews of evidence in informing disability and rehabilitation research and practice. Indicative of this trend, this journal published a piece by Rumrill, Fitzgerald and Merchant in 2010 explaining the utility and process for conducting reviews of intervention-based research. There is still need to consider how to apply such rigor when conducting more exploratory reviews of heterogeneous research.OBJECTIVES: This article explores the challenges, benefits, and procedures for conducting rigorous exploratory scoping reviews of diverse evidence. The article expands upon Rumrill, Fitzgerald and Merchant's framework and considers its application to more heterogeneous evidence on the impact of social policy. A worked example of a scoping review of the Americans with Disabilities Act is provided with a procedural framework for conducting scoping reviews on the effects of a social policy. The need for more nuanced techniques for enhancing rigor became apparent during the review process. There are multiple methodological steps that can enhance the utility of exploratory scoping reviews. The potential of systematic consideration during the exploratory review process is shown as a viable method to enhance the rigor in reviewing diverse bodies of evidence.Work 12/2014; 50(2). DOI:10.3233/WOR-141982 · 0.52 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.