Cancer survivorship: rethinking the cancer control continuum.

National Cancer Institute, NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Seminars in Oncology Nursing 09/2008; 24(3):145-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2008.05.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The implications of the changing face of cancer survivors and the survivorship experience for health promotion are explored.
National Cancer Institute and Office of Cancer Survivorship, and research and journal articles.
Health promotion has become one of the most rapidly expanding topics of interest in the broader arena of survivorship research.
Nurses have been vital champions for a holistic or 'whole person' approach to cancer care and are uniquely positioned to play a central role in ensuring that we deliver on the promise of a valued future life for each cancer survivor and family member alive. Promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors is one of those roles.

Download full-text


Available from: Julia Rowland, May 28, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer survivorship research includes the study of physical, psychosocial, and economic consequences of cancer diagnosis and treatment among pediatric and adult cancer survivors. Historically, the majority of cancer survivorship studies were from the United States, but survivorship issues are increasingly being addressed in other developed countries. Cross-cultural studies remain, however, scarce. The degree to which knowledge attained may or may not be transferred across cultures, countries, or regions is not known. Some important challenges for comparative research are therefore discussed in a cross-cultural perspective. Several substantive and methodological challenges that complicate the execution of cross-cultural cancer survivorship research are presented with examples and discussed to facilitate comparative research efforts in the establishment of new survivorship cohorts and in the planning and implementation of survivorship studies. Comparative research is one key to understanding the nature of cancer survivorship, distinguishing modifiable from nonmodifiable factors at individual, hospital, societal, and system levels and may thus guide appropriate interventions. Lastly, suggested future courses of action within the field of comparative cancer survivorship research are provided.
    Journal of Cancer Epidemiology 10/2011; 2011(1687-8558):689025. DOI:10.1155/2011/689025
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Among the great medical success stories of the 20th century was our ability to turn cancer, once almost uniformly fatal, into an illness that was curable for more people, and could be controlled in most. As a result of advances in screening and early detection, the development of effective treatments and the delivery of better supportive care, the population of those living long term with a history of cancer continues to grow. The field of cancer survivorship research, now entering its adolescence, has developed to help us better understand the human and social challenges of living long term after cancer. Estimated at approaching 12 million, cancer survivors have taught us a number of important lessons about what it means to live beyond a cancer diagnosis. In this article, 7 of these lessons will be discussed along with their implications for current clinical practice and future directions in cancer survivorship research.
    The Cancer Journal 11/2008; 14(6):361-8. DOI:10.1097/PPO.0b013e31818ec48e · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • The Breast Journal 06/2014; 20(4). DOI:10.1111/tbj.12291 · 1.43 Impact Factor