A primer on selected aspects of evidence-based practice relating to questions of treatment, Part 2: Interpreting results, application to clinical practice, and self-evaluation

Department of Physical Therapy, Regis University, Denver, CO 80212, USA.
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (Impact Factor: 2.38). 09/2008; 38(8):485-501. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2725
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The process of evidence-based practice (EBP) guides clinicians in the integration of individual clinical expertise, patient values and expectations, and the best available evidence. Becoming proficient with this process takes time and consistent practice, but should ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes. The EBP process entails 5 steps: (1) formulating an appropriate question, (2) performing an efficient literature search, (3) critically appraising the best available evidence, (4) applying the best evidence to clinical practice, and (5) assessing outcomes of care. This second commentary in a 2-part series will review principles relating to steps 3 through 5 of this 5-step model. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a perspective to assist clinicians in interpreting results, applying the evidence to patient care, and evaluating proficiency with EBP skills in studies of interventions for orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.


Available from: Julie M Whitman, May 29, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Systematic literature review. To perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on quadriceps strength, functional performance, and self-reported function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of NMES following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Searches were performed for randomized controlled trials using electronic databases from 1966 through October 2008. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Between-group effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Eight randomized controlled trials were included. The average Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale score was 4 out of possible maximum 10. The effect sizes for quadriceps strength measures (isometric or isokinetic torque) from 7 studies ranged from -0.74 to 3.81 at approximately 6 weeks postoperatively; 6 of 11 comparisons were statistically significant, with strength benefits favoring NMES treatment. The effect sizes for functional performance measures from 1 study ranged from 0.07 to 0.64 at 6 weeks postoperatively; none of 3 comparisons were statistically significant, and the effect sizes for self-reported function measures from 1 study were 0.66 and 0.72 at 12 to 16 weeks postoperatively; both comparisons were statistically significant, with benefits favoring NMES treatment. NMES combined with exercise may be more effective in improving quadriceps strength than exercise alone, whereas its effect on functional performance and patient-oriented outcomes is inconclusive. Inconsistencies were noted in the NMES parameters and application of NMES. Therapy, level 1a-.
    Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 07/2010; 40(7):383-91. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2010.3184 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prospective single-cohort study. To determine and document changes in pain and disability in patients with primary, nonacute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain treated with a manual therapy approach. To our knowledge, there are no published studies on the physical therapy management of nonacute ACJ pain. Manual physical therapy has been successful in the treatment of other shoulder conditions. The chief inclusion criterion was greater than 50% pain relief with an ACJ diagnostic injection. Patients were excluded if they had sustained an ACJ injury within the previous 12 months. Treatment was conducted utilizing a manual physical therapy approach that addressed all associated impairments in the shoulder girdle and cervicothoracic spine. The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Secondary measures were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon and global rating of change scales. Outcomes were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 months. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scale values were analyzed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Thirteen patients (11 male; mean ± SD age, 41.1 ± 9.6 years) completed treatment consisting of an average of 6.4 sessions. Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 4 weeks (P = .001; mean, 25.9 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.9, 39.8) and 6 months (P<.001; mean, 29.8 points; 95% CI: 16.5, 43.0), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scale at 4 weeks (P<.001; mean, 27.9 points; 95% CI: 14.7, 41.1) and 6 months (P<.001; mean, 32.6 points; 95% CI: 21.2, 43.9). Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in all outcome measures at 4 weeks and 6 months, following a short series of manual therapy interventions. These results, in a small cohort of patients, suggest the efficacy of this treatment approach but need to be verified by a randomized controlled trial. Therapy, level 4.
    02/2012; 42(2):66-80. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2012.3866
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cross-sectional, observational study. To explore how ankle position affects lower extremity neurodynamic testing. Upper extremity limb movements that increase neural loading create a protective muscle action of the upper trapezius, resulting in shoulder girdle elevation during neurodynamic testing. A similar mechanism has been suggested in the lower extremities. Twenty healthy subjects without low back pain participated in this study. Hip flexion angle and surface electromyographic measures were taken and compared at the onset of symptoms (P1) and at the point of maximally tolerated symptoms (P2) during straight-leg raise tests performed with ankle dorsiflexion (DF-SLR) and plantar flexion (PF-SLR). Hip flexion was reduced during DF-SLR by a mean +/- SD of 5.5 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees at P1 (P = .001) and 10.1 degrees +/- 9.7 degrees at P2 (P<.001), compared to PF-SLR. DF-SLR induced distal muscle activation and broader proximal muscle contractions at P1 compared to PF-SLR. These findings support the hypothesis that addition of ankle dorsiflexion during straight-leg raise testing induces earlier distal muscle activation and reduces hip flexion motion. The straight-leg test, performed to the onset of symptoms (P1) and with sensitizing maneuvers, allows for identification of meaningful differences in test outcomes and is an appropriate end point for lower extremity neurodynamic testing.
    Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 11/2009; 39(11):780-90. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2009.3002 · 2.38 Impact Factor