Article

Revising expectations from rapid HIV tests in the emergency department

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 09/2008; 149(3):153-60.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Expanded HIV screening efforts in the United States have increased the use of rapid HIV tests in emergency departments. The reported sensitivity and specificity of rapid HIV tests exceed 99%.
To assess whether a reactive rapid oral HIV test result correctly identifies adults with HIV infection in the emergency department.
Diagnostic test performance assessment within the framework of a randomized, clinical trial.
Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency department (Boston, Massachusetts) from 7 February to 1 October 2007.
849 adults with valid rapid oral HIV test results.
Rapid HIV testing with the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (OraSure Technologies, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania). Patients with reactive rapid test results were offered enzyme-linked immunoassay, Western blot, and plasma HIV-1 RNA testing for confirmation.
Specificity and positive likelihood ratio.
39 patients had reactive results (4.6% [95% CI, 3.2% to 6.0%]). On confirmation, 5 patients were HIV-infected (prevalence, 0.6% [CI, 0.1% to 1.1%]) and 26 were non-HIV-infected (8 patients declined confirmation). The estimated rapid test specificity was 96.9% (CI, 95.7% to 98.1%). Sensitivity analyses of the true HIV status of unconfirmed cases and test sensitivity resulted in a positive likelihood ratio of 8 to 32. Western blot alone as a confirmation test provided conclusive HIV status in only 50.0% (CI, 30.8% to 69.2%) of patients at first follow-up. The addition of HIV-1 RNA testing to the confirmation protocol improved this rate to 96.2% (CI, 88.8% to 100.0%).
Test sensitivity cannot be assessed because nonreactive OraQuick test results were not confirmed.
Although patients with a reactive oral OraQuick HIV screening test in the emergency department had an 8- to 32-fold increased odds of HIV infection compared with the pretest odds, the specificity of the test was lower than anticipated.

0 Followers
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    • "We decided to change to only a fingerstick blood technology for clinical implementation. This modification was made to streamline the testing algorithm, minimize cost and minimize the likelihood of having a false positive rapid test result (Walensky, Arbelaez et al. 2008). One LRADAC study participant had a false positive test result during the implementation of CTN0032, and this contributed to the agency's decision to change testing methods. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration has promoted HIV testing and counseling as an evidence-based practice. Nevertheless, adoption of HIV testing in substance abuse treatment programs has been slow. This article describes the experience of a substance abuse treatment agency where, following participation in a clinical trial, the agency implemented an HIV testing and counseling program. During the trial, a post-trial pilot, and early implementation the agency identified challenges and developed strategies to overcome barriers to adoption of the intervention. Their experience may be instructive for other treatment providers seeking to implement an HIV testing program. Lessons learned encompassed the observed acceptability of testing and counseling to clients, the importance of a "champion" and staff buy-in, the necessity of multiple levels of community and agency support and collaboration, the ability to streamline staff training, the need for a clear chain of command, the need to develop program specific strategies, and the requirement for sufficient funding. An examination of costs indicated that some staff time may not be adequately reimbursed by funding sources for activities such as adapting the intervention, start-up training, ongoing supervision and quality assurance, and overhead costs.
    Evaluation and program planning 02/2011; 34(4):399-406. DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.007 · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Worldwide, approximately 2.5 million children (95% CI: 2.2-2.6) are living with HIV infection. In 2007 alone, approximately 420,000 children (95%CI: 350,000-540,000) were newly infected with HIV - a vast majority of these infections were acquired through maternal-fetal transmission. Many of these infections could have been reduced by timely diagnosis and the delivery of interventions aimed at preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission. This perspective examines the attitudes preventing women from accessing HIV testing early on during pregnancy and the issues and challenges that remain in the institutionalization of interventions to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission at labor and delivery. Socio-cultural and economic factors prevent women from accessing testing at an opportune time during pregnancy. In addition, a lack of adequate infrastructure often prevents timely delivery of interventions to those who access testing at the last minute (i.e., during labor and delivery). In the wake of a pediatric HIV epidemic and the need for lifelong provision of antiretroviral therapy to infected children, a simple strategy for provision of round-the-clock rapid testing and counseling services in the labor rooms may be cost saving to the healthcare systems worldwide.
    Women s Health 02/2009; 5(1):55-62. DOI:10.2217/17455057.5.1.55
  • Annals of emergency medicine 02/2009; 53(1):151-4; discussion 154-6. · 4.33 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from