Article

Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery.

Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Clinical Rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.19). 08/2008; 22(8):758-67. DOI:10.1177/0269215508090674
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate the frequency of somatosensory impairment in stroke patients within different somatosensory modalities and different body areas, and their recovery.
Prospective observational study.
Two stroke rehabilitation units.
Seventy patients with a first stroke (36 men, 34 women; average age, 71, SD 10.00 years; average time since stroke onset, 15 days) were assessed on admission and two, four and six months after stroke.
Not applicable.
Nottingham Sensory Assessment.
Somatosensory impairment was common after stroke; 7-53% had impaired tactile sensations, 31-89% impaired stereognosis, and 34-64% impaired proprioception. When comparing somatosensory modalities within body areas the kappa values were low (kappa values<0.54). Recovery occurred over time, though not significantly in lower limb tactile sensations. Stroke severity was the main factor influencing initial somatosensory impairment, but accounted for a small amount of the variance (21-41%). Initial somatosensory impairment was significantly related to somatosensory ability at six months, accounting for 46-71% of the variance.
Proprioception and stereognosis were more frequently impaired than tactile sensations. The different somatosensory modalities showed only slight agreement between impairment within the same body areas, suggesting that the modalities are independent of each other and all should be assessed. High agreements were found between different body areas for each somatosensory modality. Somatosensory impairment was associated with stroke severity, however low variance indicated other factors were involved.

0 0
 · 
1 Bookmark
 · 
231 Views
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine test-retest reliability of the Good Balance system(®) for measurement of postural sway in poststroke patients. [Subjects] Sixty chronic stroke patients (40 men and 20 women; age 63.08 years; stroke duration 16.45 months) participated in this study. [Methods] Postural sway was evaluated using a force platform system (Good Balance system, Metitur Oy, Jyvaskyla, Finland). Two examiners measured postural sway for all participants during two separate testing sessions. The second measurement was performed one week after the first measurement. Intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC(2,1)] were used for estimation of reliability. [Results] The ICC (95% CI) for intra-examiner reliability was good to very good, ranging from 0.69 to 0.93 (0.53-0.96), and the ICC for inter-examiner reliability was good to very good, ranging from 0.85 to 0.98 (0.77-0.99). [Conclusion] The results of the current study indicated that the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of the Good Balance system(®) for measurement of postural sway was good to very good. Therefore, we suggest that measurement of postural sway using the Good Balance system(®) would be useful for clinical assessment in poststroke patients.
    Journal of Physical Therapy Science 01/2014; 26(1):121-4. · 0.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : Impaired hand function decreases quality of life after stroke. The purpose of this study was to pilot a novel 2-week upper extremity sensorimotor training program. This case series describes the training program and highlights outcome measures used for documenting behavioral change and neural reorganization. : Behavioral/performance changes were identified via sensorimotor evaluation. Activity-induced neural reorganization was examined using sensory functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor tractography, and brain volume measurement. Participant 1 was a 75-year-old right-handed man 1 year post-right hemisphere stroke, with severe sensory impairment across domains in his left hand; he reported limited left-hand/arm use. Participant 2 was a 63-year-old right-handed woman who had experienced a left hemisphere stroke 9 months earlier, resulting in mild sensory impairment across domains in her right hand, as well as mild motor deficit. : Participants were trained 4 hours per day, 5 days per week for 2 weeks. Training tasks required sensory discrimination of temperature, weights, textures, shapes, and objects in the context of active exploration with the involved hand. Random multimodal feedback was used. : Both participants had improved scores on the Wolf Motor Function Test after training. Participant 1 had no measurable change in sensory function, while participant 2 improved in touch perception, proprioception, and haptic performance. Sensory functional magnetic resonance imaging suggested neural reorganization in both participants; participant 1 had a small increase in brain volume, while superior thalamic radiation white matter connectivity was unchanged in either participant. : Participating in sensorimotor training focused on sensory discrimination during manual manipulation was feasible for both participants. Future research to determine efficacy and identify optimal measures of sensory function and neural reorganization is recommended. VIDEO ABSTRACT AVAILABLE: (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A38) for more insights from the authors.
    Journal of neurologic physical therapy: JNPT 03/2013; 37(1):27-36. · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To obtain more generalizable information on the frequency and factors influencing sensory impairment after stroke and their relationship to mobility and function. Method: A pooled analysis of individual data of stroke survivors (N = 459); mean (SD) age = 67.2 (14.8) years, 54% male, mean (SD) time since stroke = 22.33 (63.1) days, 50% left-sided weakness. Where different measurement tools were used, data were recoded. Descriptive statistics described frequency of sensory impairments, kappa coefficients investigated relationships between sensory modalities, binary logistic regression explored the factors influencing sensory impairments, and linear regression assessed the impact of sensory impairments on activity limitations. Results: Most patients' sensation was intact (55%), and individual sensory modalities were highly associated (κ = 0.60, P < .001). Weakness and neglect influenced sensory impairment (P < .001), but demographics, stroke pathology, and spasticity did not. Sensation influenced independence in activities of daily living, mobility, and balance but less strongly than weakness. Conclusions: Pooled individual data analysis showed sensation of the lower limb is grossly preserved in most stroke survivors but, when present, it affects function. Sensory modalities are highly interrelated; interventions that treat the motor system during functional tasks may be as effective at treating the sensory system as sensory retraining alone.
    Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 01/2013; 20(5):441-449. · 0.79 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
207 Downloads
Available from
May 17, 2012