Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery.

Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Clinical Rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.19). 08/2008; 22(8):758-67. DOI: 10.1177/0269215508090674
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate the frequency of somatosensory impairment in stroke patients within different somatosensory modalities and different body areas, and their recovery.
Prospective observational study.
Two stroke rehabilitation units.
Seventy patients with a first stroke (36 men, 34 women; average age, 71, SD 10.00 years; average time since stroke onset, 15 days) were assessed on admission and two, four and six months after stroke.
Not applicable.
Nottingham Sensory Assessment.
Somatosensory impairment was common after stroke; 7-53% had impaired tactile sensations, 31-89% impaired stereognosis, and 34-64% impaired proprioception. When comparing somatosensory modalities within body areas the kappa values were low (kappa values<0.54). Recovery occurred over time, though not significantly in lower limb tactile sensations. Stroke severity was the main factor influencing initial somatosensory impairment, but accounted for a small amount of the variance (21-41%). Initial somatosensory impairment was significantly related to somatosensory ability at six months, accounting for 46-71% of the variance.
Proprioception and stereognosis were more frequently impaired than tactile sensations. The different somatosensory modalities showed only slight agreement between impairment within the same body areas, suggesting that the modalities are independent of each other and all should be assessed. High agreements were found between different body areas for each somatosensory modality. Somatosensory impairment was associated with stroke severity, however low variance indicated other factors were involved.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proprioception plays important roles in planning and control of limb posture and movement. The impact of proprioceptive deficits on motor function post-stroke has been difficult to elucidate due to limitations in current tests of arm proprioception. Common clinical tests only provide ordinal assessment of proprioceptive integrity (eg. intact, impaired or absent). We introduce a standardized, quantitative method for evaluating proprioception within the arm on a continuous, ratio scale. We demonstrate the approach, which is based on signal detection theory of sensory psychophysics, in two tasks used to characterize motor function after stroke.
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 04/2014; 11(1):77. · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background Somatosensory ability is commonly impaired after stroke. Despite the growing recognition for the need to understand service users’ experiences and perspectives in health services provision, the experiences of stroke survivors’ living with somatosensory impairment have yet to be reported. Objective To gain an insight into how stroke survivors experience somatosensory impairment after stroke. Design A qualitative study design was used with data analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Methods Semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out with purposively selected community dwelling stroke survivors who had somatosensory impairment. Results Five stroke survivors were interviewed in this study. Data analysis resulted in the emergence of three superordinate themes (i) making sense of somatosensory impairment, (ii) interplay of somatosensory impairment and motor control for executing tasks and (iii) perseverance versus learned non-use. The stroke survivors in this study were aware that their somatosensory ability was affected as a result of their stroke, but had difficulty in articulating their experiences of sensation and the impact of the impairment on functional ability. Most often somatosensory impairment was described in terms of difficulties with executing specific tasks, particularly by the upper limb. Conclusion It is important to be aware that somatosensory impairment is of concern to stroke survivors. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based and practice-appropriate clinical assessment tools and treatment strategies for somatosensory rehabilitation after stroke.
    Physiotherapy 06/2014; 100(2):150-155. · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proprioception is the sensation of position and movement of our limbs and body in space. This sense is important for performing smooth coordinated movements and is impaired in approximately 50% of stroke survivors. In the present case series we wanted to determine how discrete stroke lesions to areas of the brain thought to be critical for somatosensation (thalamus, posterior limb of internal capsule, primary somatosensory cortex and posterior parietal cortex) would affect position sense and kinesthesia in the acute stages post-stroke. Given the known issues with standard clinical measures of proprioception (i.e. poor sensitivity and reliability) we used more modern quantitative robotic assessments to measure proprioception. Neuroimaging (MRI, n=10 or CT, n=2) was performed on 12 subjects 2-10 days post-stroke. Proprioception was assessed using a KINARM robot within the same time frame. Visually guided reaching was also assessed to allow us to compare and contrast proprioception with visuomotor performance. Proprioceptive impairments were observed in 7 of 12 subjects. Thalamic lesions (n=4) were associated with position sense (n=1) or position sense and kinesthesia (n=1) impairments. Posterior limb of the internal capsule lesions (n=4) were associated with primarily position sense (n=1) or kinesthesia (n=2) impairments. Lesions affecting primary somatosensory cortex and posterior parietal cortex (n=2) were associated with significant position sense and kinesthesia impairments. All subjects with damage to hypothesized structures displayed impairments with performance on the visually guided reaching task. Across the proprioceptive tasks, we saw that position sense and kinesthesia were impaired to differing degrees, suggesting a potential dissociation between these two components of proprioception.
    Journal of the neurological sciences 04/2014; · 2.32 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 5, 2014