Brown Superfund Basic Research Program: A multistakeholder partnership addresses real-world problems in contaminated communities

Department of Sociology, Center for Environmental Studies, International Relations Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Environmental Science and Technology (Impact Factor: 5.48). 08/2008; 42(13):4655-62. DOI: 10.1021/es7023498
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The NIEHS funds several basic and applied research programs, many of which also require research translation or outreach. This paper reports on a project by the Brown University Superfund Basic Research Program (SBRP), in which outreach and research translation teams collaborated with state regulatory agency personnel and community activists on a legislative initiative to mitigate the financial impacts of living in a contaminated community. The Environmentally Compromised Home Ownership (ECHO) program makes home equity loans of up to $25,000 available to qualified applicants. This collaboration provides a case study in community engagement and demonstrates how research translation and outreach activities that are clearly differentiated yet well-integrated can improve a suite of basic and applied research. Although engaging diverse constituencies can be difficult community-engaged translation and outreach have the potential to make research findings more useful to communities, address some of the social impacts of contamination, and empower stakeholders to pursue their individual and collectively held goals for remediation. The NIEHS has recently renewed its commitment to community-engaged research and advocacy, making this an optimal time to reflect on how basic research programs that engage stakeholders through research translation and outreach can add value to the overall research enterprise.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In August 2010, we gathered for the sixtieth annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems (SSSP). Ours is not a professional association per se, such that our mission or purpose is not to advance careers within the academy or in applied fields of the social sciences. We are different: Our purpose is to facilitate, communicate, and promote the work done by those who pursue social justice locally, nationally, and in the wider world. Thus, this article brings into focus social justice work by using illustrations of the different types of scholarship that characterize it. My intent is to plait three strands of inquiry. First, I identify and summarize the key fea-tures of social activist and social advocacy scholarship, that which is typically recognized as so-cial justice work. Second, based on those features, I posit that critical community engagement work is a form of social justice work that SSSP can and should recognize and promote. Third, to examine some of the best social justice work, and to tie together advocacy and engagement work, I visit what SSSP has honored, since 1964, with the C. Wright Mills award. A number of the award winners are exemplars of critical community engagement scholarship. Before turning to the work of many SSSP members, I acknowledge that organizations, such as Project South, the Innocence Project, and the Center for the Study of Social Justice at the University of Tennessee, commit all their work to social justice. Further, I recognize the importance of what researchers do outside the boundaries of the social sciences. Natural and man-made disasters need responses, and better yet, preventive practices that depend on schol-ars and practitioners from every imaginable field of work. As do some of the most persistent social problems, such as war, inadequate food, and unclean water. The social sciences cannot claim exclusive ownership of social justice work. For example, at Purdue University, an agronomist named Gabisa Ejeta is the 2009 World Food Prize winner. His research develops sorghum that is resistant to a specific weed that kills the grain. He does this work because he is deeply committed to searching for solutions for one of the world's most basic social problems, i.e., starvation. He calls his work "Purpose-Driven Science." His mission is to reduce hunger throughout the world, especially in his native Ethiopia and other African nations, without making them dependent on the United States to produce grain seeds. With Ejeta's approval, I use his terminology, "purpose driven," throughout this article.
    Social Problems 02/2011; 58(1):1-20. DOI:10.1525/sp.2011.58.1.1 · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The characterization and remediation of contaminated sites are complex endeavors fraught with numerous challenges. One particular challenge that is receiving increased attention is the development and encouragement of full participation by communities and community members affected by a given site in all facets of decision-making. Many disciplines have been grappling with the challenges associated with environmental and risk communication, public participation in environmental data generation, and decision-making and increasing community capacity. The concepts and methods developed by these disciplines are reviewed, with a focus on their relevance to the specific dynamics associated with environmental contamination sites. The contributions of these disciplines are then synthesized and integrated to help develop Environmental Research Translation (ERT), a proposed framework for environmental scientists to promote interaction and communication among involved parties at contaminated sites. This holistic approach is rooted in public participation approaches to science, which includes: a transdisciplinary team, effective collaboration, information transfer, public participation in environmental projects, and a cultural model of risk communication. Although there are challenges associated with the implementation of ERT, it is anticipated that application of this proposed translational science method could promote more robust community participation at contaminated sites.
    Science of The Total Environment 08/2014; 497-498C:651-664. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.021 · 3.16 Impact Factor
  • Environmental Justice 08/2012; 5(4):188-197. DOI:10.1089/env.2010.0021

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014