Article

A comprehensive synthetic genetic interaction network governing yeast histone acetylation and deacetylation.

High-Throughput Biology Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Genes & Development (Impact Factor: 12.64). 09/2008; 22(15):2062-74. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1679508
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Histone acetylation and deacetylation are among the principal mechanisms by which chromatin is regulated during transcription, DNA silencing, and DNA repair. We analyzed patterns of genetic interactions uncovered during comprehensive genome-wide analyses in yeast to probe how histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) protein complexes interact. The genetic interaction data unveil an underappreciated role of HDACs in maintaining cellular viability, and led us to show that deacetylation of the histone variant Htz1p at Lys 14 is mediated by Hda1p. Studies of the essential nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4 (NuA4) revealed acetylation-dependent protein stabilization of Yng2p, a potential nonhistone substrate of NuA4 and Rpd3C, and led to a new functional organization model for this critical complex. We also found that DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) result in local recruitment of the NuA4 complex, followed by an elaborate NuA4 remodeling process concomitant with Rpd3p recruitment and histone deacetylation. These new characterizations of the HDA and NuA4 complexes demonstrate how systematic analyses of genetic interactions may help illuminate the mechanisms of intricate cellular processes.

Full-text

Available from: Joel S Bader, Dec 16, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
94 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While histone acetylation and deacetylation machineries (HATs and HDACs) regulate important aspects of cell function by targeting histone tails, recent work highlights that non-histone protein acetylation is also pervasive in eukaryotes. Here, we use quantitative mass-spectrometry to define acetylations targeted by the sirtuin family, previously implicated in the regulation of non-histone protein acetylation. To identify HATs that promote acetylation of these sites, we also performed this analysis in gcn5 (SAGA) and esa1 (NuA4) mutants. We observed strong sequence specificity for the sirtuins and for each of these HATs. While the Gcn5 and Esa1 consensus sequences are entirely distinct, the sirtuin consensus overlaps almost entirely with that of Gcn5, suggesting a strong coordination between these two regulatory enzymes. Furthermore, by examining global acetylation in an ada2 mutant, which dissociates Gcn5 from the SAGA complex, we found that a subset of Gcn5 targets did not depend on an intact SAGA complex for targeting. Our work provides a framework for understanding how HAT and HDAC enzymes collaborate to regulate critical cellular processes related to growth and division.
    Molecular &amp Cellular Proteomics 11/2014; 14(1). DOI:10.1074/mcp.M114.043141 · 7.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heterochromatin formation and nuclear organization are important in gene regulation and genome fidelity. Proteins involved in gene silencing localize to sites of damage, and likewise, some DNA repair proteins localize to heterochromatin but the biological importance of these correlations remains unclear. In this study we examined the role of double strand break repair proteins in gene silencing and nuclear organization. We find that the ATM kinase Tel1 and the proteins Mre11 and Esc2 can silence a reporter gene dependent on the Sir as well as other repair proteins. Furthermore, these proteins aid in the localization of silenced domains to specific compartments in the nucleus. We identify two distinct mechanisms for repair protein mediated silencing: via direct and indirect interactions with Sir proteins as well as by tethering loci to the nuclear periphery. This study reveals previously unknown interactions between repair proteins and silencing proteins and suggests insights into the mechanism underlying genome integrity. © 2015 by The American Society for Cell Biology.
    Molecular Biology of the Cell 01/2015; 26(7). DOI:10.1091/mbc.E14-09-1413 · 4.55 Impact Factor