Article

Why do heavy littermates grow better than lighter ones? A study in wild and domestic European rabbits.

Department of Animal Physiology, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Physiology & Behavior (impact factor: 2.87). 08/2008; 95(3):441-448. DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.07.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Birth mass can vary considerably among mammalian littermates. Heavier pups often show higher growth rates than their lighter siblings, which might positively affect fitness-relevant parameters during later life. Such a correlation between birth mass and pre-weaning growth within litters was confirmed by our study of wild-type and domestic European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) living in a semi-natural environment and under laboratory housing conditions, respectively. Our study indicates that at least two main mechanisms account for this relationship in our study species: heavier pups had a higher milk intake and also showed a more efficient conversion of milk into body mass. Furthermore, our study suggests that the better milk conversion by heavy pups was driven by three synergistic mechanisms: heavier pups had comparatively more huddling partners in the nest, they did not need to perform large amounts of proactive behavior in order to reach and remain in a central position within the litter huddle, and they could maintain a comparatively higher body temperature most probably due to their more favorable surface area to volume ratio. In conclusion, our study of European rabbits provides strong evidence that both under natural conditions and in the laboratory, within-litter differences in birth mass are maintained and may even increase during pups' early postnatal development.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
38 Views
  • Source
    Article: Private heat for public warmth: how huddling shapes individual thermogenic responses of rabbit pups.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within their litter, young altricial mammals compete for energy (constraining growth and survival) but cooperate for warmth. The aim of this study was to examine the mechanisms by which huddling in altricial infants influences individual heat production and loss, while providing public warmth. Although considered as a textbook example, it is surprising to note that physiological mechanisms underlying huddling are still not fully characterised. The brown adipose tissue (BAT) contribution to energy output was assessed as a function of the ability of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) pups to huddle (placed in groups of 6 and 2, or isolated) and of their thermoregulatory capacities (non-insulated before 5 days old and insulated at ca. 10 days old). BAT contribution of pups exposed to cold was examined by combining techniques of infrared thermography (surface temperature), indirect calorimetry (total energy expenditure, TEE) and telemetry (body temperature). Through local heating, the huddle provided each pup whatever their age with an ambient "public warmth" in the cold, which particularly benefited non-insulated pups. Huddling allowed pups facing a progressive cold challenge to buffer the decreasing ambient temperature by delaying the activation of their thermogenic response, especially when fur-insulated. In this way, huddling permitted pups to effectively shift from a non-insulated to a pseudo-insulated thermal state while continuously allocating energy to growth. The high correlation between TEE and the difference in surface temperatures between BAT and back areas of the body reveals that energy loss for non-shivering thermogenesis is the major factor constraining the amount of energy allocated to growth in non-insulated altricial pups. By providing public warmth with minimal individual costs at a stage of life when pups are the most vulnerable, huddling buffers cold challenges and ensures a constant allocation of energy to growth by reducing BAT activation.
    PLoS ONE 01/2012; 7(3):e33553. · 4.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Possible contribution of position in the litter huddle to long-term differences in behavioral style in the domestic rabbit.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many aspects of an animal's early development might potentially contribute to long-term individual differences in physiology and behavior. Here we asked whether differences among littermates of the domestic rabbit in the position in the litter huddle that they occupy during the early nest period might contribute to the development of distinct behavioral and physiological phenotypes. In each of 12 litters we determined the pup occupying the most peripheral, the most central, and an intermediate position in the huddle during the first postnatal week. We then tested the responses of these same individuals as nestlings, juveniles and young adults when confronted by a range of age-appropriate environmental challenges. Two behavioral tests appeared particularly discriminatory in identifying differences associated with early position in the huddle; latency of pre-weaning pups to jump down from a shelf, and the response of young adults to the fearful screams of a conspecific. In both cases animals that had occupied the periphery of the huddle showed behavioral responses indicative of a more proactive behavioral style than their "intermediate" or "central" littermates. We conclude that while consistent long-term differences in behavioral style associated with early position in the litter huddle exist in rabbits, future work is needed to confirm the causal nature of this association, to identify underlying mechanisms, and to refine methods of behavioral and physiological testing across the life span.
    Physiology & Behavior 07/2011; 104(5):778-785. · 2.87 Impact Factor

Keywords

Birth mass
 
body mass
 
efficient conversion
 
favorable surface area
 
fitness-relevant parameters
 
heavier pups
 
heavy pups
 
higher body temperature
 
higher growth rates
 
higher milk intake
 
laboratory housing conditions
 
large amounts
 
litter huddle
 
milk conversion
 
Oryctolagus cuniculus
 
pre-weaning growth
 
pups'
 
strong evidence
 
synergistic mechanisms
 
two main mechanisms account