Article

Why don't doctors wash their hands? A correlational study of thinking styles and hand hygiene.

Department of Palliative & Supportive Services, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
American journal of infection control (Impact Factor: 2.33). 09/2008; 36(6):399-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.11.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The World Health Organization has identified cognitive determinants of hand hygiene as an outstanding research question. This study investigated whether doctors' preferences for a rational thinking style or an experiential thinking style are associated with hand hygiene compliance.
This was an observational study of hand hygiene practices of 32 doctors in 2 teaching hospitals in South Australia. Compliance rates were correlated with self-reported thinking styles. The doctors were observed by a trained observer during a ward round or outpatient clinic and were unaware that hand hygiene was under observation. The main outcome measures were hand hygiene compliance (hand hygiene compliance tool) and thinking style (Rational-Experiential Inventory).
An overall mean compliance rate of 7.6% (standard deviation +/- 7.2%) was found. Compliance was significantly positively correlated with experiential/automatic thinking (r = .46; P = .004) and the observational setting of ward rounds (vs clinics) (r = -.47; P = .003). No significant relationship was found between compliance and a rational/deliberate thinking style (r = -.01; P = .472).
Hand hygiene is more experiential than rational. Findings suggest that certain promotional strategies appealing to the experiential thinking mode may improve compliance, and that traditional approaches based on logic and reasoning alone probably will not work.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Malcolm James Bond, Jul 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
143 Views
  • Source
    • "more positive attitudes towards practice guidelines found among staff in paediatric vs adult ICUs ( p<0·001 ) ; nurses and other staff had more positive attitudes than physicians towards guidelines in general not specifi c HH guidelines ; positive attitudes towards guidelines correlated with self - reported adherence ( p<0·001 ) and use of alcohol products for HH ( p<0·002 ) Sladek et al , 2008 , 71 Australia Investigate whether rational or experience - based thinking in physicians are associated with adherence to HH Observational study of survey participants in connected study and data analysis with cognitive - experiential self theory 32 consultants Participants were mainly men HH adherence correlated well with experience - based thinking ( r=0·64 , p=0·004 ) and the observational setting of ward rounds ( vs outpatient clinics ) ( r=0·47 , p=0·003 ) ; rational thinking and HH did not correlate ( r=0·01 , p=0·472 ) Strategies to promote HH that appeal to experiential thinking may improve outcomes , and traditional approaches based on logic and reason might not work alone HCWs=health - care workers . HH=hand hygiene ; HAI=health - care - associated infection . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changes in the behaviour of health-care workers (HCWs) are required to improve adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines. Despite heavy investment in strategies to change behaviour, effectiveness has not been adequately assessed. We did a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of interventions to change IPC behaviour and assessed exploratory literature for barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change. 21 studies published from 1999 to 2011 met our inclusion criteria: seven intervention studies and 14 exploratory studies. Of the intervention studies none explicitly incorporated psychological theory and only two contained elements of social marketing in the design, although five addressed sustainability. All elicited behaviour change, reduction in infection risk, or both. The exploratory studies identified social and cultural factors that affect the IPC behaviour of HCWs. To improve the standard of research and broaden the evidence base, we recommend that quality criteria are added to existing systematic review guidelines to enable the inclusion of qualitative research and to ensure robust design, implementation, and reporting of interventions.
    The Lancet Infectious Diseases 02/2012; 12(4):318-29. DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70283-3 · 19.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cognitive-Experiential Self Theory assumes that reasoning conforms to a parallel dual processing model (comprising rational and experiential systems), through which we make sense of the world. The Rational Experiential Inventory was developed to measure an individual’s preference for rational (need for cognition) and experiential (faith in intuition) thinking, with individual differences proposed to influence the respective dominance of each. While small but consistent gender effects have been found previously, age effects have rarely been reported or investigated across the lifespan. We examine both age and gender differences in Rational Experiential Inventory scores, using combined data from five studies involving adult participants (n=520, 61.9% male) with a mean age of 41.45years (SD=11.73, range 20–74years). Results suggest a convergence of the rational and experiential systems in adulthood, although the timing may be different for women and men. In later adulthood, the relationship appears to diverge again.
    Personality and Individual Differences 01/2010; 49(8):907-911. · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding how doctors think may inform both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Developing such an understanding requires valid and reliable measurement tools. We examined the measurement properties of the Inventory of Cognitive Bias in Medicine (ICBM), designed to tap this domain with specific reference to medicine, but with previously questionable measurement properties. First year postgraduate entry medical students at Flinders University, and trainees (postgraduate doctors in any specialty) and consultants (N = 348) based at two teaching hospitals in Adelaide, Australia, completed the ICBM and a questionnaire measuring thinking styles (Rational Experiential Inventory). Questions with the lowest item-total correlation were deleted from the original 22 item ICBM, although the resultant 17 item scale only marginally improved internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.61 compared with 0.57). A factor analysis identified two scales, both achieving only alpha = 0.58. Construct validity was assessed by correlating Rational Experiential Inventory scores with the ICBM, with some positive correlations noted for students only, suggesting that those who are naïve to the knowledge base required to "successfully" respond to the ICBM may profit by a thinking style in tune with logical reasoning. The ICBM failed to demonstrate adequate content validity, internal consistency and construct validity. It is unlikely that improvements can be achieved without considered attention to both the audience for which it is designed and its item content. The latter may need to involve both removal of some items deemed to measure multiple biases and the addition of new items in the attempt to survey the range of biases that may compromise medical decision making.
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 02/2008; 8:20. DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-8-20 · 1.50 Impact Factor
Show more