Article

Sirolimus therapy in liver transplant patients: An initial experience at a single center

Transplant Immunology Unit, San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Transplantation Proceedings (Impact Factor: 0.95). 07/2008; 40(6):1950-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sirolimus (SRL) is an mTOR inhibitor that has been shown, in contrast to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), to inhibit cancers in experimental models. Since February 2005, we introduced SRL in liver transplant patients in group a, in whom the primary disease was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcoholic or autoimmune liver cirrhosis, and group b, HCC-negative patients who developed posttransplantation cancers de novo. Of 18 patients in group a, 11 received SRL ab initio (subgroup a1), starting for 10 patients at 66.1+/-29.2 days after surgical healing and after 10 days in 1 case; the remaining 7 patients (subgroup a2) received SRL at 31.2+/-24.2 months. Three patients in group b, included 1 with Kaposi's sarcoma, 1 with bladder cancer, and 1 with thyroid cancer. In this group, SRL was introduced at 80.8+/-40.4 months. In all patients but one, who received a single 5 mg loading dose, SRL was started at 2 mg/d and adjusted to 6 to 8 ng/mL blood levels. CNI drugs, present as primary therapy, were gradually tapered to low levels and eventually stopped. The following observations were drawn from this initial experience: (1) 4/21 (19.0%) patients had to discontinue SRL because of early and late side effects: thrombocytopenia (n=2) and headache with leukopenia and leg edema associated with knee joint arthralgia (n=2); (2) 14 patients (11 in group a and 3 in group b) are still on SRL monotherapy; (3) 1 HCC recurrence and 1 de novo pancreatic adenocarcinoma were observed at 14 and 16 months, respectively (at the time of transplantation, both patients were beyond the MIlan HCC criteria), and (4) 1 patient, from subgroup a1, died after 99 days due to pneumonitis and possible relation to SRL lung toxicity. In conclusion, SRL appeared to be an effective immunosuppressant that could be used as monotherapy in liver transplant patients. Any conclusion on SRL anticancer effects can only come from randomized large studies after long follow-up.

1 Bookmark
 · 
84 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been associated in a dose-dependent fashion with an increased risk of post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (sirolimus/everolimus) might represent an alternative immunosuppressive regimen with anti-neoplastic effect. In the present systematic review, the association between mTORi and HCC recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) was evaluated and compared against that of CNIs-treated patients. In total, 3666 HCC liver transplant recipients from 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Patients under CNIs developed HCC recurrence significantly more frequently, compared to patients under mTORi (448/3227 or 13.8% vs 35/439 or 8%, p<0.001) although patients treated with CNIs had a higher proportion of HCC within Milan criteria (74% vs 69%) and lower rates of microvascular invasion, compared to mTORi-treated patients (22% vs 44%)(p<0.05). Patients on everolimus had significantly lower recurrence rates of HCC, compared to those on sirolimus or CNIs (4.1% vs 10.5% vs 13.8%, respectively, p<0.05), but everolimus-treated recipients had shorter follow up period (13 vs 30 vs 43.2months, respectively) and more frequently been transplanted for HCC within Milan criteria (84% vs 60.5% vs 74%, respectively, p<0.05). Our findings favor the use of mTORi instead of CNIs to control HCC recurrence after LT, but comparative studies with longer follow up are needed for final conclusions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Transplant International 06/2014; 27(10). DOI:10.1111/tri.12372 · 3.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatocellular carcinoma is (HCC) the most common primary malignancy of the liver in adults. It is also the fifth most common solid cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Treatment options for HCC include liver transplantation, surgical resection, locoregional therapies and chemotherapy. The median survival time of patients following the diagnosis of unresectable disease is approximately 6-20 months, whereas the 5-year survival is less than 5%. Given the projected increase in incidence of HCC due to hepatitis C virus infection and obesity related cirrhosis, there is an urgent need for more intensive research in this cancer. In this article, we review the systemic options available for patients with HCC, its molecular pathogenesis and future therapeutic directions with special emphasis on immune-based and molecularly-targeted therapy.
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 09/2014; 14(10):1-14. DOI:10.1586/14737140.2014.949246 · 3.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) is a rare but challenging condition. In most cases, the recurrent tumor is presented with extrahepatic spread. Therefore, systemic treatment with sorafenib has to be assessed. Because of a plethora of possible drug interactions, e.g., with immunosuppressant or anti-infective therapy, safety and feasibility of sorafenib treatment requires special attention. We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients who suffered from recurrent advanced HCC after LT between January 2002 and December 2010 at the University Hospital Heidelberg regarding safety of sorafenib treatment and survival. Results showed that 8 patients were eligible for treatment with sorafenib showing a median time to progression (TTP) of 4.5 months and an overall survival of 9 months. Most common side effects were grades I and II diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) which could be managed by sorafenib dose reduction. No grade III or IV adverse events (AEs) were noticed. No patient had to discontinue treatment due to AEs. The ten patients not amenable for sorafenib treatment, due to initial poor performance status or its deterioration after first line treatment, were treated with surgical resection (n = 3), locoregional therapies (n = 1), or palliative radiation therapy (n = 1). They showed a median overall survival of 2.3 months. Sorafenib may represent a therapeutic option for recurrent HCC after LT with manageable side effects. The clinical benefit of sorafenib in this setting is promising but needs to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.
    Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery 10/2013; DOI:10.1007/s00423-013-1114-1 · 1.89 Impact Factor