Photochemistry of hydrogen-bonded aromatic pairs: quantum dynamical calculations for the pyrrole-pyridine complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:12707

Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, D-85747 Garching, Germany.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 10/2008; 105(35):12707-12. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801062105
Source: PubMed


The photochemical dynamics of the pyrrole-pyridine hydrogen-bonded complex has been investigated with computational methods. In this system, a highly polar charge-transfer state of (1)pipi* character drives the proton transfer from pyrrole to pyridine, leading to a conical intersection of S(1) and S(0) energy surfaces. A two-sheeted potential-energy surface including 39 in-plane nuclear degrees of freedom has been constructed on the basis of ab initio multiconfiguration electronic-structure data. The non-Born-Oppenheimer nuclear dynamics has been treated with time-dependent quantum wave-packet methods, including the two or three most relevant nuclear degrees of freedom. The effect of the numerous weakly coupled vibrational modes has been taken into account with reduced-density-matrix methods (multilevel Redfield theory). The results provide insight into the mechanisms of excited-state deactivation of hydrogen-bonded aromatic systems via the electron-driven proton-transfer process. This process is believed to be of relevance for the ultrafast excited-state deactivation of DNA base pairs and may contribute to the photostability of the molecular encoding of the genetic information.


Available from: Luis Manuel Frutos
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Some of the important conclusions reached in this analysis of PCET are summarized below. The sections in which they are discussed are also cited. (1) PCET describes reactions in which there is a change in both electron and proton content between reactants and products. It originates from the influence of changes in electron content on acid-base properties and provides a molecular-level basis for energy transduction between proton transfer and electron transfer (section 1). (2) Coupled electron-proton transfer or EPT is defined as an elementary step in which electrons and protons transfer from different orbitals on the donor to different orbitals on the acceptor. There is (usually) a clear distinction between EPT and H-atom transfer (HAT) or hydride transfer, in which the transferring electrons and proton come from the same bond. Hybrid mechanisms exist in which the elementary steps are different for the reaction partners (sections 5.1 and 5.2). (3) EPT pathways such as PhO*/PhOH exchange have much in common with HAT pathways in that electronic coupling is significant, comparable to the reorganization energy with HDA ∼ λ. (4) Multiple-Site Electron-Proton Transfer (MS-EPT) is an elementary step in which an electron-proton donor transfers electrons and protons to different acceptors, or an electron-proton acceptor accepts electrons and protons from different donors. It exploits the long-range nature of electron transfer while providing for the short-range nature of proton transfer (section 5.1). (5) A variety of EPT pathways exist, creating a taxonomy based on what is transferred, e.g., le-12H+ WEPT (section 5.1). (6) PCET achieves "redox potential leveling" between sequential couples and the buildup of multiple redox equivalents, which is of importance in multielectron catalysis (section 2. 1). (7) There are many examples of PCET and pH-dependent redox behavior in metal complexes, in organic and biological molecules, in excited states, and on surfaces (section 2). (8) Changes in pH can be used to induce electron transfer through films and over long distances in molecules. Changes in pH, induced by local electron transfer, create pH gradients and a driving force for long-range proton transfer in Photosysem 11 and through other biological membranes (sections 3 and 7.2). (9) In EPT, simultaneous transfer of electrons and protons occurs on time scales short compared to the periods of coupled vibrations and solvent modes. A theory for EPT has been developed which rationalizes rate constants and activation barriers, includes temperature- and driving force (ΔG)-dependences implicitly, and explains kinetic isotope effects. The distance-dependence of EPT is dominated by the short range nature of proton transfer, with electron transfer being far less demanding (sections 4.2 and 5). (10) Changes in external pH do not affect an EPT elementary step. Solvent molecules or buffer components can act as proton donor acceptors, but individual H2O molecules are neither good bases (pKa(H3)O+) = - 1.74) nor good acids (pK(H2O) = 15.7) (section 5.5.3). (11) There are many examples of mechanisms in chemistry, in biology, on surfaces, and in the gas phase which utilize EPT (sections 6 and 7). (12) PCET and EPT play critical roles in the oxygen evolving complex (OEC) of Photosystem Il and other biological reactions by decreasing driving force and avoiding high-energy intermediates (section 7.2).
    Chemical Reviews 12/2007; 107(11):5004-64. DOI:10.1021/cr0500030 · 46.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding the motions of the constituent atoms in reacting molecules lies at the heart of chemistry and is the central focus of chemical reaction dynamics. The most detailed questions one can ask are about the evolution of molecules prepared in a single quantum state to products in individual states, and both calculations and experiments are providing such detailed understanding of increasingly complex systems. A central goal of these studies is uncovering the essential details of chemical change by removing the averaging over the initial conditions that occurs in many cases. Such information provides an exquisite test of theory and helps paint pictures of complicated chemical transformations. The goal of this Special Feature is to provide a snapshot of a portion of the field of chemical reaction dynamics. Much of the work presented here emphasizes a close interplay of experiment and theory in ways that sharpen the conclusions of both and animate future studies. The articles do not completely cover the rich field of chemical reaction dynamics but rather provide a glimpse of some of the emerging insights.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 10/2008; 105(35):12647-8. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0805363105 · 9.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present the first fully quantum-mechanical dynamical study of the pi pi* --> n pi* decay in photoexcited uracil derivatives in solution. The dynamics of this process for uracil (U) and 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU) in acetonitrile and aqueous solution is investigated, by treating both electrons and nuclei at the quantum-mechanical level, and solving the time-dependent Schrodinger equation for the evolution of the photoexcited system. The potential energy surfaces along the most relevant nuclear degrees of freedom have been obtained at the time-dependent density functional theory level, accounting for the solvent effect by mixed atomistic/continuum models. The obtained results nicely agree with experimental evidence. For U, we predict an ultrafast (<50 fs) pi pi* --> n pi* decay with 10-25% yields, weakly dependent on the solvent. This finding strongly indicates that the npi* state is responsible for the decay channel observed in experiments for U in polar solvents, yielding to a final recovery of the ground state in tens of picoseconds. At variance, our dynamical calculations predict a remarkable solvent effect for 5FU, showing that the pi pi* --> n pi* decay channel is open in acetonitrile and closed in water, in agreement with the much faster decay observed in experiments in the first solvent. The analysis of our theoretical simulations, also including explicitly the laser excitation step, allows us to point out a number of interesting features for the decay dynamics of photoexcited molecules with close-lying electronic states, whose general interest goes beyond the specific system under investigation.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 09/2009; 113(43):14491-503. DOI:10.1021/jp906524p · 3.30 Impact Factor
Show more