Abundant Gene-by-Environment Interactions in Gene Expression Reaction Norms to Copper within Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA 06520.
Genome Biology and Evolution (Impact Factor: 4.53). 09/2012; 4(11). DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs084
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Genetic variation for plastic phenotypes potentially contributes phenotypic variation to populations that can be selected during adaptation to novel ecological contexts. However, the basis and extent of plastic variation that manifests in diverse environments remains elusive. Here we characterize copper reaction norms for mRNA abundance among five S. cerevisiae strains to a) describe population variation across the full range of ecologically relevant copper concentrations, from starvation to toxicity, and b) to test the hypothesis that plastic networks exhibit increased population variation for gene expression. We find that although the vast majority of the variation is small in magnitude (considerably less than two-fold), not just some, but most genes demonstrate variable expression across environments, across genetic backgrounds, or both. Plastically expressed genes included both genes regulated directly by copper-binding transcription factors Mac1 and Ace1 and genes indirectly responding to the downstream metabolic consequences of the copper gradient, particularly genes involved in copper, iron, and sulfur homeostasis. Copper-regulated gene networks exhibited more similar behavior within the population in environments where those networks have a large impact on fitness. Nevertheless, expression variation in genes like Cup1, important to surviving copper stress, was linked with variation in mitotic fitness and in the breadth of differential expression across the genome. By revealing a broader and deeper range of population variation, our results provide further evidence for the interconnectedness of genome-wide mRNA levels, their dependence on environmental context and genetic background, and the abundance of variation in gene expression that can contribute to future evolution.

Download full-text


Available from: Jeffrey Peter Townsend, Jul 29, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many behaviours vary in response to the environment (biotic or abiotic) and therefore represent an interesting form of phenotypic plasticity. Behavioural plasticity, like other plastic traits, can evolve through genetic assimilation or accommodation. However, little is known about the nature of changes in gene expression plasticity that accompanies these evolutionary changes in phenotypic plasticity. We know that variation in gene expression level, a first-order phenotype, underlies much behavioural variation. Several studies have begun to document which genes show expression-level variation related to plastic changes in behaviour as well as evolved changes in behaviour. Advances in sequencing technology allow us to address these questions on a genomic scale. By characterizing changes in gene expression according to the concept of a norm of reaction one can describe the evolved patterns of gene expression that accompany the evolution of behavioural plasticity. Here, we describe how genomic approaches can help us understand changes in gene expression that accompany or underlie the evolution of behavioural plasticity. To do this, we provide a framework of classification for the evolved patterns of gene expression plasticity that could underlie genetic assimilation or accommodation of behaviour. We provide examples of genetic assimilation from the animal behaviour and animal physiology literature that have been, or can be, studied at a genomic level. We then describe the characteristics of an appropriate study system and briefly address experimental design using the available genomic tools in a comparative context. Studying the patterns of gene expression associated with genetic assimilation will elucidate processes by which behavioural plasticity has evolved. (c) 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Animal Behaviour 05/2013; 85(5):1012–1022. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.012 · 3.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Predicting phenotype from genotype is greatly complicated by the polygenic nature of most traits and by the complex interactions between phenotype and the environment. Here, we review recent whole-genome approaches to understand the underlying principles, mechanisms, and evolutionary impacts of genotype x environment (GxE) interactions, defined as genotype-specific phenotypic responses to different environments. There is accumulating evidence that GxE interactions are ubiquitous, accounting perhaps for the greater part of the phenotypic variation seen across genotypes. Such interactions appear to be the consequence of changes to upstream regulators as opposed to local changes to promoters. Moreover, genes are not equally likely to exhibit GxE interactions; promoter architecture, expression level, regulatory complexity, and essentiality correlate with the differential regulation of a gene by the environment. One implication of this correlation is that expression variation across genotypes alone could be used as a proxy for GxE interactions in those experimental cases where identifying environmental variation is costly or impossible.
    Trends in Genetics 06/2013; 29. DOI:10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.006 · 11.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ecological conditions can influence not only the expression of a phenotype, but also the heritability of a trait. As such, heritable variation for a trait needs to be studied across environments. We have investigated how pathogen challenge affects the expression of MHC genes in embryos of the lake whitefish Coregonus palaea. In order to experimentally separate paternal (i.e. genetic) from maternal and environmental effects, and determine whether and how stress affects the heritable variation for MHC expression, embryos were produced in full-factorial in vitro fertilizations, reared singly, and exposed at 208 degree days (late-eyed stage) to either one of two strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens that differ in their virulence characteristics (one increased mortality, while both delayed hatching time). Gene expression was assessed 48 h postinoculation, and virulence effects of the bacterial infection were monitored until hatching. We found no evidence of MHC class II expression at this stage of development. MHC class I expression was markedly down-regulated in reaction to both pseudomonads. While MHC expression could not be linked to embryo survival, the less the gene was expressed, the earlier the embryos hatched within each treatment group, possibly due to trade-offs between immune function and developmental rate or further factors that affect both hatching timing and MHC expression. We found significant additive genetic variance for MHC class I expression in some treatments. That is, changes in pathogen pressures could induce rapid evolution in MHC class I expression. However, we found no additive genetic variance in reaction norms in our study population.
    Molecular Ecology 09/2013; 22(20). DOI:10.1111/mec.12457 · 5.84 Impact Factor
Show more