The clinical and radiological outcome of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment for acute scaphoid fractures A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial

Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
The Bone & Joint Journal (Impact Factor: 3.31). 10/2012; 94(10):1403-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.28844
Source: PubMed


The use of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) to stimulate bone growth has been recommended as an alternative to the surgical treatment of ununited scaphoid fractures, but has never been examined in acute fractures. We hypothesised that the use of PEMF in acute scaphoid fractures would accelerate the time to union by 30% in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. A total of 53 patients in three different medical centres with a unilateral undisplaced acute scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to receive either treatment with PEMF (n = 24) or a placebo (n = 29). The clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed at four, six, nine, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. A log-rank analysis showed that neither time to clinical and radiological union nor the functional outcome differed significantly between the groups. The clinical assessment of union indicated that at six weeks tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox (p = 0.03) as well as tenderness on longitudinal compression of the scaphoid (p = 0.008) differed significantly in favour of the placebo group. We conclude that stimulation of bone growth by PEMF has no additional value in the conservative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures.

Download full-text


Available from: Pascal Hannemann, Jun 07, 2015
35 Reads
  • Source
    J Hu · T Zhang · D Xu · J Qu · L Qin · J Zhou · H Lu
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to explore the effect of combined magnetic fields (CMFs) on osteogenesis and the remodeling of newly formed bone at bone-tendon (BT) junction. Forty-eight mature rabbits in whom partial patellectomy was performed were used to establish a BT junction injury model at the patella-patellar tendon (PPT) complex and were then allocated to CMF treatment group (CMF group) or placebo treatment group (control group). Daily CMF therapy was delivered continuously from post-operative day 3 to weeks 4, 8, and 16. At each time point, the animals were sacrificed, and the PPT complexes were harvested for radiographic, histological, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) evaluation. The area, length, and bone mineral density of the newly formed bone in the CMF group were significantly greater than the control group at post-operative weeks 8 and 16. The micro-CT results showed that the newly formed bone in the CMF group contained more and thicker trabeculae than the control group at weeks 8 and 16. Histologically, the CMF group showed better remodeling of the BT junction. In conclusion, CMF treatment was able to accelerate osteogenesis during BT junction repair, thus facilitating the healing of BT junction injury.
    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 05/2014; 25(3). DOI:10.1111/sms.12251 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: To best inform evidence-based patient care, it is often desirable to compare competing therapies. We performed a network meta-analysis to indirectly compare low intensity pulsed ultrasonography (LIPUS) with electrical stimulation (ESTIM) for fracture healing. Methods: We searched the reference lists of recent reviews evaluating LIPUS and ESTIM that included studies published up to 2011 from 4 electronic databases. We updated the searches of all electronic databases up to April 2012. Eligible trials were those that included patients with a fresh fracture or an existing delayed union or nonunion who were randomized to LIPUS or ESTIM as well as a control group. Two pairs of reviewers, independently and in duplicate, screened titles and abstracts, reviewed the full text of potentially eligible articles, extracted data and assessed study quality. We used standard and network meta-analytic techniques to synthesize the data. Results: Of the 27 eligible trials, 15 provided data for our analyses. In patients with a fresh fracture, there was a suggested benefit of LIPUS at 6 months (risk ratio [RR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.41). In patients with an existing nonunion or delayed union, ESTIM had a suggested benefit over standard care on union rates at 3 months (RR 2.05, 95% CI 0.99-4.24). We found very low-quality evidence suggesting a potential benefit of LIPUS versus ESTIM in improving union rates at 6 months (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-1.01) in fresh fracture populations. Conclusion: To support our findings direct comparative trials with safeguards against bias assessing outcomes important to patients, such as functional recovery, are required.
    Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie 06/2014; 57(3):E105-E118. DOI:10.1503/cjs.010113 · 1.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the best currently available evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) bone growth stimulation with placebo for acute fractures. Materials and methods We performed a systematic literature search of the medical literature from 1980 to 2013 for randomized clinical trials concerning acute fractures in adults treated with PEMF or LIPUS. Two reviewers independently determined the strength of the included studies by assessing the risk of bias according to the criteria in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results Seven hundred and thirty-seven patients from 13 trials were included. Pooled results from 13 trials reporting proportion of nonunion showed no significant difference between PEMF or LIPUS and control. With regard to time to radiological union, we found heterogeneous results that significantly favoured PEMF or LIPUS bone growth stimulation only in non-operatively treated fractures or fractures of the upper limb. Furthermore, we found significant results that suggest that the use of PEMF or LIPUS in acute diaphyseal fractures may accelerate the time to clinical union. Conclusions Current evidence from randomized trials is insufficient to conclude a benefit of PEMF or LIPUS bone growth stimulation in reducing the incidence of nonunions when used for treatment in acute fractures. However, our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that PEMF or LIPUS can be beneficial in the treatment of acute fractures regarding time to radiological and clinical union. PEMF and LIPUS significantly shorten time to radiological union for acute fractures undergoing non-operative treatment and acute fractures of the upper limb. Furthermore, PEMF or LIPUS bone growth stimulation accelerates the time to clinical union for acute diaphyseal fractures.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 06/2014; 134(8). DOI:10.1007/s00402-014-2014-8 · 1.60 Impact Factor
Show more