Article

Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in a diverse US integrated health care population

Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California. .
Journal of Medical Virology (Impact Factor: 2.22). 11/2012; 84(11):1744-50. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.23399
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes influence response to therapy, and recently approved direct-acting antivirals are genotype-specific. Genotype distribution information can help to guide antiviral development and elucidate infection patterns. HCV genotype distributions were studied in a diverse cross-section of patients in the Northern California Kaiser Permanente health plan. Associations between genotype and race/ethnicity, age, and sex were assessed with multivariate logistic regression models. The 10,256 patients studied were median age 56 years, 62% male, 55% White non-Hispanic. Overall, 70% were genotype 1, 16% genotype 2, 12% genotype 3, 1% genotype 4, <1% genotype 5, and 1% genotype 6. Blacks (OR 4.5 [3.8-5.5]) and Asians (OR 1.2 [1.0-1.4]) were more likely to have genotype 1 than 2/3 versus non-Hispanic Whites. Women less likely had genotype 1 versus 2/3 than did men (OR 0.86 [0.78-0.94]). Versus non-Hispanic Whites, Asians (OR 0.38 [0.31-0.46]) and Blacks (OR 0.73 [0.63-0.84]) were less likely genotype1a than 1b; Hispanics (OR 1.3 [1.1-1.5]) and Native Americans (OR 1.9 [1.2-2.8]) more likely had genotype 1a than 1b. Patients age ≥65 years less likely had genotype 1a than 1b versus those age 45-64 (OR 0.34 [0.29-0.41]). The predominance of genotype 1 among all groups studied reinforces the need for new therapies targeting this genotype. Racial/ethnic variations in HCV genotype and subtype distribution must be considered in formulating new agents and novel strategies to successfully treat the diversity of hepatitis C patients. J. Med. Virol. 84:1744-1750, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

1 Follower
 · 
148 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Approximately 25 % of persons living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are coinfected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). In cohort studies of HIV-HCV coinfection, HCV genotypes 2 and 3 account for 15 %-64 % of disease. Compared with HCV monoinfection, liver disease is accelerated in coinfected patients, and anti-HCV treatment is less successful. This article reviews the current knowledge and recommendations for management of HCV genotype 2 and 3 infection in patients living with HIV. While pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)/ ribavirin (RBV) remains the standard treatment for HCV genotype 2/3 infection, ongoing clinical trials with more effective therapies will soon be available. In particular, an IFN sparing regimen of sofosbuvir/RBV may become available in 2014. It is also evident that HCV genotypes 2 and 3 respond differently to therapy and should be approached differently both in practice and in clinical trials. Issues including drug-drug interactions between anti-HCV and anti-HIV therapies are addressed.
    Current HIV/AIDS Reports 11/2013; 10(4). DOI:10.1007/s11904-013-0186-4
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatitis C (HCV) coinfection is the leading cause of liver-related morbidity and is a leading cause of mortality in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals in the antiretroviral therapy era. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies are transforming how HCV is treated with significant improvements in efficacy and tolerability. In this article, DAA agents expected to be available in 2014 are reviewed, including telaprevir, boceprevir, sofosbuvir, simeprevir, faldaprevir, and daclatasvir. Available data regarding clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and drug interactions in HIV-HCV coinfection are discussed. The management of adverse effects of HCV therapy and treatment considerations in patients with cirrhosis are also reviewed.
    Current HIV/AIDS Reports 11/2013; 10(4). DOI:10.1007/s11904-013-0182-8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) and ribavirin can induce a sustained virologic response (SVR) in some but not all hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. The mechanism of effective treatment is unclear. One possibility is that IFN-α differentially improves the functional capacity of classic myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) by altering expression of surface molecules or cytokines. Others have proposed that antigen-presenting cell activation could be paradoxically detrimental in HCV due to the production by monocytes of substances inhibitory or toxic to plasmacytoid dendritic cells.Methods. We examined responses to in vitro IFN-α treatment of peripheral blood leukocyte samples from a retrospective treatment cohort of nearly 200 HCV-seropositive patients who had undergone antiviral therapy with ribavirin and peginterferon. We analyzed the variable responses of antigen-presenting cell subsets to drug.Results. We found that patients achieving SVR were no more likely to have robust mDC activation in response to IFN-α than those who failed to achieve SVR. Rather, patients achieving SVR were distinguished by restrained monocyte activation in the presence of IFN-α, a factor that was second in importance only to IL28B genotype in its association with SVR.Conclusions. These results suggest that inter-individual variability in the response of monocytes to IFN-α is an important determinant of treatment success with IFN-α-based regimens.
    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 12/2013; DOI:10.1093/infdis/jit801