Assessing the risk of stroke from neck manipulation: a systematic review

The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia Société Franco-Européenne de Chiropratique (SOFEC), Villemoble, France Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropratique, Paris, France Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth Australia
International Journal of Clinical Practice (Impact Factor: 2.54). 10/2012; 66(10):940-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.03004.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background
Strokes, typically involving vertebral artery dissection, can follow cervical spinal manipulative therapy, and these types of stroke occur rarely. There is disagreement about whether a strong association between neck manipulation and stroke exists. An earlier systematic review found two relevant studies of association that used controls, which also discussed the limitations of the two papers. Our systematic review updates the earlier review, and aims to determine whether conclusive evidence of a strong association exists.

PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed, and the literature was searched using a strategy that included the terms ‘neck manipulation’ and ‘stroke’ from the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Plus and AMED databases. Citations were included if they met criteria such as being case–control studies, and dealt with neck manipulation and/or neck movement/positioning. Papers were scored for their quality, using similar criteria to the earlier review. For individual criteria, each study was assigned a full positive score if the criterion was satisfied completely.

Four case–control studies and one case–control study, which included a case- crossover design, met the selection criteria, but all of them had at least three items in the quality assessment that failed to be completely positive. Two studies were assessed to be the most robustly designed, one indicating a strong association between stroke and various intensities of neck movement, including manipulation, and the other suggesting a much reduced relative association when using primary care practitioners’ visits as controls. However, potential biases and confounders render the results inconclusive.

Conclusive evidence is lacking for a strong association between neck manipulation and stroke, but is also absent for no association. Future studies of association will need to minimise potential biases and confounders, and ideally have sufficient numbers of cases to allow subgroup analysis for different types of neck manipulation and neck movement.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Skew deviation mimics superior oblique palsy. Associated findings can include ocular torsion, head tilt, headache, and neurologic symptoms that may help localize the responsible intracranial lesion. Accurate diagnosis is essential in determining and treating the underlying cause. Imaging options will be reviewed. A 29-year-old white male presented to the emergency room with sudden onset vertical diplopia after self-neck manipulation. An ophthalmic evaluation led to the diagnosis of skew deviation. Diagnostic imaging revealed an infarct of the cerebellum likely secondary to a vertebral artery dissection. Besides neck manipulation, other possible contributing factors include smoking, elevated cholesterol, and elevated testosterone. Symptoms resolved within 24 hours and the patient was treated with aspirin and atorvastatin calcium. Skew deviation must be a consideration in patients with vertical diplopia, and ruled out before a superior oblique palsy diagnosis. Vertebral artery dissections are uncommon in the general population but can account for up to 25% of ischemic strokes in the young and middle-aged. Smoking, high cholesterol, and high testosterone are known risk factors of stroke. Research is inconclusive on spinal manipulation's relation to stroke. This report presents an example of neck manipulation directly preceding skew deviation secondary to stroke. Reprint & Copyright © 2015 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.
    Military medicine 01/2015; 180(1):e168-73. DOI:10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00292 · 0.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of complementary, alternative, and traditional therapies is increasing in the United States, and patients and their families are bringing these practices into the acute care setting. Acute and critical care nurses are in a unique and trusted position to advocate for their patients and to promote safe incorporation of complementary, alternative, and traditional therapies into the plan of care. ©2014 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
    Critical Care Nurse 12/2014; 34(6):50-6. DOI:10.4037/ccn2014807 · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to quantify risk of stroke after chiropractic spinal manipulation, as compared to evaluation by a primary care physician, for Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years with neck pain.
    Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 01/2015; 33(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.001 · 1.25 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014