Clinical comparison of Gluma and Er:YAG laser treatment of cervically exposed hypersensitive dentin

Department of Operative Dentistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
American journal of dentistry (Impact Factor: 0.85). 06/2012; 25(3):131-5.
Source: PubMed


To compare the desensitizing effects of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing system (Gluma) and an Er:YAG laser treatment on cervically exposed hypersensitive dentin.
A total of 22 subjects (mean age: 39 +/- 13.7 years; 15 females, 7 males) suffering from cervical dentin hypersensitivity was included in a prospective, split-mouth clinical study. The teeth were treated on one side of the mouth with the glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing system and on the other side with the Er:YAG laser. Sensitivity perception was recorded before treatment (baseline), during and immediately after treatment, after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. The subjects were asked to rate the sensitivity experienced during air stimulation by placing a mark on a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Both techniques showed an effective reduction of cervical dentin hypersensitivity. The subjects experienced equal improvements compared to their status before and 6 months after treatment with both methods (P<0.001).

1 Follower
20 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dentin hypersensitivity is a common symptomatic condition that causes discomfort and sometimes severe pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser treatment on cervically exposed hypersensitive dentin. Twenty patients with dentin hypersensitivity of caries-free teeth were selected. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure dentin sensitivity in response to air stimulus. A 2-minute Er:YAG laser (energy level: 60 mJ/pulse; repetition rate: 2 Hz) was applied to cervically exposed hypersensitive dentin. After 4 weeks, the hypersensitive teeth were examined again, and the VAS score was measured again and recorded. No complications such as detrimental pulpal effects were observed. Eighteen participants reported significantly reduced dentin hypersensitivity 4 weeks after the laser desensitization treatment. The VAS scores measured 4 weeks after the Er:YAG laser desensitization treatment were significantly decreased as compared with those measured at the baseline (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the Er:YAG laser desensitization treatment can effectively reduce hypersensitivity of cervically exposed hypersensitive dentin.
    Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 04/2013; 113(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2013.02.013 · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of lasers in reducing dentin hypersensitivity (DH) as compared with placebo or no treatment. Seven electronic databases and a manual search resulted in 2,538 unique publications. After selection, 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. A CONSORT-based quality assessment revealed that 3 and 10 studies were at low and high risk of bias, respectively. A random-effects model with the generic inverse variance standardized mean difference (SMD) was used because of expected heterogeneity. Meta-analyses of the baseline-end of follow-up changes in pain revealed no differences for Er,Cr:YSSG vs. placebo (SMD = 2.49; 95% CI, -0.25 to 5.22; p = .07) but did reveal differences in favor of lasers for Er:YAG vs. placebo (SMD, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.25 to 4.05; p = .0002), Nd:YAG vs. placebo (SMD, 3.59; 95% CI, 0.49 to 6.69; p = .02), and GaAlAs vs. placebo (SMD, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.93 to 4.87; p < .00001). High and significant heterogeneity was found for all comparisons. In conclusion, Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and GaAlAs lasers appear to be efficacious in reducing DH. However, given the high heterogeneity of the included studies, future randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.
    Journal of dental research 04/2013; 92(6). DOI:10.1177/0022034513487212 · 4.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the desensitizing efficacy of 2% sodium fluoride solution (NaF), diode laser (DL), a DL and NaF association and a solution of hydroxyl-ethyl-methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (HEMA-G: Gluma desensitizer) in cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH). 262 teeth of 24 subjects (16 females and eight males; age 21 to 64 years, mean 38 years), each having at least two CHD teeth for each quadrant, were included in this prospective, split mouth, clinical study. Teeth of each oral quadrant were randomized in four groups (SG) to study the effectiveness of NaF (SG-1), of DL (SG-2) NaF-DL combination (SG-3) and HEMA-G (SG-4). The subjects were asked to rate the sensitivity experienced during air stimulation by placing a mark on a visual analogue scale (VAS) before treatment (baseline), immediately after treatment, and after 1, and 6 months. The outcomes showed a significant reduction of discomfort compared to baseline values for teeth of SG-3 immediately post treatment (82.6%) (P < 0.001), after 1 month (69.5%) (P < 0.001) and after 6 months (60.8%) (P < 0.001), respectively, compared with the reduction scores of 51.6% (P < 0.001), 29.7% (P < 0.05) and 4.7% (P > 0.05), recorded for SG-1; 72.2%, (P < 0.001), 62.5% (P < 0.001), and 47.2% (P < 0.05), recorded for SG-2; 77.4% (P < 0.001), 56.1% (P < 0.001), and 27.3% (P < 0.05), recorded for SG-4.
    American journal of dentistry 08/2013; 26(4):214-8. · 0.85 Impact Factor
Show more