Article

Benefits and Harms of Detecting Clinically Occult Breast Cancer

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave 5-124, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada. .
CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment (Impact Factor: 15.16). 09/2012; 104(20):1542-7. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs394
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the last few decades there has been an increase in the use of strategies to detect clinically occult breast cancer with the aim of achieving diagnosis at an earlier stage when prognosis may be improved. Such strategies include screening mammography in healthy women, diagnostic imaging and axillary staging in those diagnosed with breast cancer, and the use of follow-up imaging for the early detection of recurrent or metastatic disease. Some of these strategies are established, whereas for others there are inconsistent supportive data. Although the potential benefit of early detection of clinically occult breast cancer seems intuitive, use of such strategies can also be associated with harm. In this commentary, we provide an extended discussion on the potential benefits and harms of the routine and frequent use of screening interventions to detect clinically occult breast cancer and question whether we may be causing more harm than good.

0 Followers
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the effect of integrating point-of-care clinical decision support (CDS) using the ACR Appropriateness Criteria (AC) into an inpatient computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system for advanced imaging requests. Over 12 months, inpatient CPOE requests for nuclear medicine, CT, and MRI were processed by CDS to generate an AC score using provider-selected data from pull-down menus. During the second 6-month period, AC scores were displayed to ordering providers, and acknowledgement was required to finalize a request. Request AC scores and percentages of requests not scored by CDS were compared among primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists, and by years in practice of the responsible physician of record. CDS prospectively generated a score for 26.0% and 30.3% of baseline and intervention requests, respectively. The average AC score increased slightly for all requests (7.2 ± 1.6 versus 7.4 ± 1.5; P < .001), for PCPs (6.9 ± 1.9 versus 7.4 ± 1.6; P < .001), and minimally for specialists (7.3 ± 1.6 versus 7.4 ± 1.5; P < .001). The percentage of requests lacking sufficient structured clinical information to generate an AC score decreased for all requests (73.1% versus 68.9%; P < .001), for PCPs (78.0% versus 71.7%; P < .001), and for specialists (72.9% versus 69.1%; P < .001). Integrating CDS into inpatient CPOE slightly increased the overall AC score of advanced imaging requests as well as the provision of sufficient structured data to automatically generate AC scores. Both effects were more pronounced in PCPs compared with specialists. Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR 01/2015; 12(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.013 · 2.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether mammographic or sonographic features can predict the Oncotype DX™ recurrence scores (RS) in patients with TI-II, hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2/neu negative and node negative breast cancers. Institutional board review was obtained and informed consent was waived for this retrospective study. Seventy-eight patients with stage I-II invasive breast cancer that was HR positive, HER2 negative, and lymph node negative for whom mammographic and or sonographic imaging and Oncotype DX™ assay scores were available were included in the study Four breast dedicated radiologists blinded to the RS retrospectively described the lesions according to BI-RADS lexicon descriptors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for significant independent predictors of low (<18) versus intermediate to high range (≥18). Two imaging features reached statistical significance in predicting low from intermediate or high risk RS: pleomorphic microcalcifications within a mass (P = 0.017); OR 8.37, 95 % CI (1.47-47.79) on mammography and posterior acoustic enhancement in a mass on ultrasound (P = 0.048); OR 4.35, 95 % CI (1.01-18.73) on multivariable logistic regression. A mass with pleomorphic microcalcifications on mammography or the presence of posterior acoustic enhancement on ultrasound may predict an intermediate to high RS as determined by the Oncotype DX(TM) assay in patients with stage I-II HR positive, HER2 negative, and lymph node negative invasive breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 09/2014; 148(1). DOI:10.1007/s10549-014-3143-z · 4.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is growing interest in the use of autologous fat grafting (AFG) for breast reconstruction. Concerns have been raised regarding its effectiveness and safety. The primary objective was to determine the oncological, clinical, aesthetic and functional, patient reported, process and radiological outcomes of AFG. A protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42013005254). Types of studies: All original studies. Types of participants: Women undergoing reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. Types of Interventions: AFG techniques for reconstruction. Types of outcome measures: Oncological, clinical, aesthetic and functional, patient reported, process and radiological. Search terms and keywords: The search strategy was devised to find papers regarding AFG for breast reconstruction. Data sources: Electronic databases were searched from 1st January 1986 to 31st March 2014 including: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registries. Identification and selection of studies: Title and abstract screening and full text assessment undertaken separately by independent researchers. Data extraction, collection and management: Data extracted by two researchers and stored in a standardised database. 35 studies were included (3624 patients) with a high degree of patient and surgeon satisfaction over a mean of 1.9 sessions at 18 month follow-up. Fat necrosis was the commonest reported complication (4.4%), biopsy of a subsequent breast lump was required in 2.7% and an interval mammogram in 11.5%. The weighted mean recurrence rate was 4.4% at 24.6 months. Meta-analysis of comparative studies showed no significant difference in oncological event rates between AFG and non-AFG groups (p = 0.10). AFG is a potentially useful reconstructive tool, has a relatively low complication rate, with the majority of patients and clinicians satisfied or very satisfied with the results. Long term clinical and radiological follow-up is required. Further research is necessary to confirm oncological ramifications. Copyright © 2014 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 11/2014; 68(2). DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.038 · 1.47 Impact Factor