Predicting the Fate of Biodiversity Using Species’ Distribution Models: Enhancing Model Comparability and Repeatability

Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 09/2012; 7(9):e44402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044402
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Species distribution modeling (SDM) is an increasingly important tool to predict the geographic distribution of species. Even though many problems associated with this method have been highlighted and solutions have been proposed, little has been done to increase comparability among studies. We reviewed recent publications applying SDMs and found that seventy nine percent failed to report methods that ensure comparability among studies, such as disclosing the maximum probability range produced by the models and reporting on the number of species occurrences used. We modeled six species of Falco from northern Europe and demonstrate that model results are altered by (1) spatial bias in species' occurrence data, (2) differences in the geographic extent of the environmental data, and (3) the effects of transformation of model output to presence/absence data when applying thresholds. Depending on the modeling decisions, forecasts of the future geographic distribution of Falco ranged from range contraction in 80% of the species to no net loss in any species, with the best model predicting no net loss of habitat in Northern Europe. The fact that predictions of range changes in response to climate change in published studies may be influenced by decisions in the modeling process seriously hampers the possibility of making sound management recommendations. Thus, each of the decisions made in generating SDMs should be reported and evaluated to ensure conclusions and policies are based on the biology and ecology of the species being modeled.


Available from: Roland Jansson, Jun 03, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Climate change may affect biodiversity to a large extent. Its effects have already caused shifts in species distributions and even species extinctions. Since especially high latitude regions are expected to be affected, this publication assesses the impact of future climate change on the biodiversity in the Barents Region (northern parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland, and Northwest Russia). It reports on the impact of climate change on a large range of species, including amphibians, butterflies, birds, mammals, moths, plants, slugs, snails, and reptiles, of which a few were studied more in depth. It further identifies future hotspots of species diversity and gives recommendations on species that should be prioritized for conservation and on areas that should be included in the network of protected areas in future. Lastly, it provides guidance on which aspects require further study
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The distributions of riverine dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) were modeled at the scale of individual river segments across the northeastern United States, a 784,982 km2 region spanning from Ohio, West Virginia, and Virginia northeast to Maine. The species distribution modeling approach was reviewed with respect to Odonata, and several modeling techniques were compared. Species locality data assigned only to U.S. county is prevalent in invertebrate databases, and it was found that using these data for modeling tends to overpredict the geographic distributions of species. Several techniques to compensate for geographic sampling bias, which is also a characteristic of these largely opportunisticly collected databases, were compared, though the optimum method (thinning data, biased background sampling, or no treatment) depended on the dataset. Watersheds and riparian zones are ecologically relevant for riverine organisms, and models with catchment- and local-scale predictors outperformed models based only on climate. This fine-scale modeling approach is appropriate for the conservation of freshwater diversity, because individual river segments containing suitable species habitat can be identified and prioritized. Climate change is expected to reduce the available habitat for riverine Odonata within the northeastern U.S., though some rivers may serve as climatic refugia, and conservation of these rivers and their watersheds is essential.
    08/2014, Degree: Ph.D., Supervisor: Nancy E. McIntyre
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The outcome of plant introductions is often considered in binary terms (invasive or non-invasive). However, most species experience a time lag before naturalization occurs, and many species become naturalized at some sites but not at others. It is therefore important to understand the site-specific mechanisms underlying naturalization. Proteaceae is an interesting case as some species are widespread invaders, while others, despite a long history of cultivation, show no signs of naturalization. At least 26 non-native Proteaceae species have been introduced to, and are cultivated in, South Africa. We mapped populations and examined differences between naturalized and non-naturalized populations (e.g. propagule pressure, land use and bioclimatic suitability). Of the 15 species surveyed, 6 were naturalized at one or more sites. Of these, Hakea salicifolia is most widely cultivated, but is only naturalizing in some areas (32 naturalized populations out of 62 populations that were surveyed). We found propagule pressure to be the most important determinant of naturalization for H. salicifolia. However, in suboptimal climatic conditions, naturalization only occurred if micro-site conditions were suitable, i.e. there was some disturbance and water available. For the other naturalized species there were few sites to compare, but we came to similar conclusions – Banksia integrifolia only naturalized at the site where it was planted the longest; Banksia serrata only naturalized at a site influenced by fire regimes; while Banksia formosa naturalized at sites with high propagule pressure, absence of fires and where there is no active clearing of the plants. Naturalization of Proteaceae in South Africa appears to be strongly mediated by site-specific anthropogenic activities (e.g. many planted individuals and water availability). More broadly, we argue that invasion biology needs to focus more closely on the mechanisms by which species and pathways interact to determine the likelihood and consequence of an invasion.
    Acta Oecologica 08/2014; 59:62–71. DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2014.05.005 · 1.84 Impact Factor