Article

Ragulator is a GEF for the rag GTPases that signal amino acid levels to mTORC1

Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Biology, Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
Cell (Impact Factor: 33.12). 09/2012; 150(6):1196-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.032
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The mTOR Complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway regulates cell growth in response to numerous cues, including amino acids, which promote mTORC1 translocation to the lysosomal surface, its site of activation. The heterodimeric RagA/B-RagC/D GTPases, the Ragulator complex that tethers the Rags to the lysosome, and the v-ATPase form a signaling system that is necessary for amino acid sensing by mTORC1. Amino acids stimulate the binding of guanosine triphosphate to RagA and RagB but the factors that regulate Rag nucleotide loading are unknown. Here, we identify HBXIP and C7orf59 as two additional Ragulator components that are required for mTORC1 activation by amino acids. The expanded Ragulator has nucleotide exchange activity toward RagA and RagB and interacts with the Rag heterodimers in an amino acid- and v-ATPase-dependent fashion. Thus, we provide mechanistic insight into how mTORC1 senses amino acids by identifying Ragulator as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for the Rag GTPases.

4 Followers
 · 
192 Views
    • "In particular, the outer surface of the lysosomal membrane constitutes a privileged site for the detection of amino acid repletion by the so-called ''Ragulator,'' a multiprotein complex with guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity that controls MTORC1 activation by Ras homolog enriched in brain (RHEB) (Bar-Peled et al., 2012). In the presence of amino acids, RAG GTPases are recruited to the lysosomal surface and activated by the Ragulator, resulting in optimal MTORC1 signaling and autophagy inhibition (Sancak et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autophagy constitutes a prominent mechanism through which eukaryotic cells preserve homeostasis in baseline conditions and in response to perturbations of the intracellular or extracellular microenvironment. Autophagic responses can be relatively non-selective or target a specific subcellular compartment. At least in part, this depends on the balance between the availability of autophagic substrates ("offer") and the cellular need of autophagic products or functions for adaptation ("demand"). Irrespective of cargo specificity, adaptive autophagy relies on a panel of sensors that detect potentially dangerous cues and convert them into signals that are ultimately relayed to the autophagic machinery. Here, we summarize the molecular systems through which specific subcellular compartments-including the nucleus, mitochondria, plasma membrane, reticular apparatus, and cytosol-convert homeostatic perturbations into an increased offer of autophagic substrates or an accrued cellular demand for autophagic products or functions. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Molecular cell 08/2015; 59(4):522-539. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.021 · 14.46 Impact Factor
    • "The levels of other key metabolites have multiple effects that influence both metabolism and cell signaling in ways that we are just beginning to understand. For example, 2-oxoglutarate (2OG, also known as a-ketoglutarate) is a central intermediate in the TCA cycle, but also needed for amino acid interconversion and breakdown by transamination, which may affect the activity level of a major amino acid sensor and growth regulator, mTORC1 (Bar-Peled et al. 2012). In addition , 2OG is a critical cofactor for the Jumonji class of histone methyl-N-lysine demethylases (Hou and Yu 2010), TET family 5-methylcytosine hydroxylases (Wu and Zhang 2011), and EglN-type prolyl-4-hydroxylases (Freeman et al. 2003), all of which likely affect the level of expression of genes encoding signaling proteins. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SUMMARY We have come a long way in the 55 years since Edmond Fischer and the late Edwin Krebs discovered that the activity of glycogen phosphorylase is regulated by reversible protein phosphorylation. Many of the fundamental molecular mechanisms that operate in biological signaling have since been characterized and the vast web of interconnected pathways that make up the cellular signaling network has been mapped in considerable detail. Nonetheless, it is important to consider how fast this field is still moving and the issues at the current boundaries of our understanding. One must also appreciate what experimental strategies have allowed us to attain our present level of knowledge. We summarize here some key issues (both conceptual and methodological), raise unresolved questions, discuss potential pitfalls, and highlight areas in which our understanding is still rudimentary. We hope these wide-ranging ruminations will be useful to investigators who carry studies of signal transduction forward during the rest of the 21st century.
    Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 10/2014; 6(12). DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a022913 · 8.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Multiple GAPs have also been identified for Rags including the GATOR1 complex for RagA/B (Bar-Peled et al., 2013), the FLCN-FNIP complex for RagC/D (Tsun et al., 2013), and possibly the leucyl-tRNA synthase for RagD (Han et al., 2012). In addition, the Ragulator complex functions as a GEF for RagA/B, whose activity is induced via the lysosomal v-ATPase upon amino acid stimulation (Bar-Peled et al., 2012). Finally, although GDI proteins are known to control the functions of Rho and Rab subfamilies of small GTPases (Garcia-Mata et al., 2011; Pfeffer and Aivazian, 2004), no GDIs have been described for either Rheb or Rags. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) integrates diverse environmental signals to control cellular growth and organismal homeostasis. In response to nutrients, Rag GTPases recruit mTORC1 to the lysosome to be activated, but how Rags are regulated remains incompletely understood. Here, we show that Sestrins bind to the heterodimeric RagA/B-RagC/D GTPases, and function as guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) for RagA/B. Sestrin overexpression inhibits amino-acid-induced Rag guanine nucleotide exchange and mTORC1 translocation to the lysosome. Mutation of the conserved GDI motif creates a dominant-negative form of Sestrin that renders mTORC1 activation insensitive to amino acid deprivation, whereas a cell-permeable peptide containing the GDI motif inhibits mTORC1 signaling. Mice deficient in all Sestrins exhibit reduced postnatal survival associated with defective mTORC1 inactivation in multiple organs during neonatal fasting. These findings reveal a nonredundant mechanism by which the Sestrin family of GDIs regulates the nutrient-sensing Rag GTPases to control mTORC1 signaling.
    Cell 09/2014; 159(1):122-33. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.038 · 33.12 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from