Reproducibility of Four-dimensional Computed Tomography-based Lung Ventilation Imaging

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr., Stanford, CA 94305-5847.
Academic radiology (Impact Factor: 2.08). 09/2012; 19(12). DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.07.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A novel ventilation imaging method based on four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) has been applied to the field of radiation oncology. Understanding its reproducibility is a prerequisite for clinical applications. The purpose of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging over different days and the same session. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two ventilation images were created from repeat 4D CT scans acquired over the average time frames of 15 days for 6 lung cancer patients and 5 minutes for another 6 patients. The reproducibility was quantified using the voxel-based Spearman rank correlation coefficients for all lung voxels and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for the spatial overlap of segmented high-, moderate-, and low-functional lung volumes. Furthermore, the relationship between the variation in abdominal motion range as a measure of the depth of breathing and variation in ventilation was evaluated using linear regression. RESULTS: The voxel-based correlation between the two ventilation images was moderate on average (0.50 ± 0.15). The DSCs were also moderate for the high- (0.60 ± 0.08), moderate- (0.46 ± 0.06), and low-functional lung (0.58 ± 0.09). No patients demonstrated strong correlations. The relationship between the motion range variation and ventilation variation was found to be moderate and significant. CONCLUSIONS: We investigated the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging over the time frames of 15 days and 5 minutes and found that it was only moderately reproducible. Respiratory variation during 4D CT scans was found to deteriorate the reproducibility. Improvement of 4D CT imaging is necessary to increase the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging.

Download full-text


Available from: Julian C Hong, Jun 22, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new form of functional imaging has been proposed in the form of 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) ventilation. Because 4DCTs are acquired as part of routine care for lung cancer patients, calculating ventilation maps from 4DCTs provides spatial lung function information without added dosimetric or monetary cost to the patient. Before 4DCT-ventilation is implemented it needs to be clinically validated. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) provide a clinically established way of evaluating lung function. The purpose of our work was to perform a clinical validation by comparing 4DCT-ventilation metrics with PFT data. Ninety-eight lung cancer patients with pretreatment 4DCT and PFT data were included in the study. Pulmonary function test metrics used to diagnose obstructive lung disease were recorded: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity. Four-dimensional CT data sets and spatial registration were used to compute 4DCT-ventilation images using a density change-based and a Jacobian-based model. The ventilation maps were reduced to single metrics intended to reflect the degree of ventilation obstruction. Specifically, we computed the coefficient of variation (SD/mean), ventilation V20 (volume of lung ≤20% ventilation), and correlated the ventilation metrics with PFT data. Regression analysis was used to determine whether 4DCT ventilation data could predict for normal versus abnormal lung function using PFT thresholds. Correlation coefficients comparing 4DCT-ventilation with PFT data ranged from 0.63 to 0.72, with the best agreement between FEV1 and coefficient of variation. Four-dimensional CT ventilation metrics were able to significantly delineate between clinically normal versus abnormal PFT results. Validation of 4DCT ventilation with clinically relevant metrics is essential. We demonstrate good global agreement between PFTs and 4DCT-ventilation, indicating that 4DCT-ventilation provides a reliable assessment of lung function. Four-dimensional CT ventilation enables exciting opportunities to assess lung function and create functional avoidance radiation therapy plans. The present work provides supporting evidence for the integration of 4DCT-ventilation into clinical trials. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 03/2015; 92(2). DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.019 · 4.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the performance of a 4-dimensional (4-D) cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) reconstruction scheme based on simultaneous motion estimation and image reconstruction (SMEIR) through patient studies. The SMEIR algorithm contains 2 alternating steps: (1) motion-compensated CBCT reconstruction using projections from all phases to reconstruct a reference phase 4D-CBCT by explicitly considering the motion models between each different phase and (2) estimation of motion models directly from projections by matching the measured projections to the forward projection of the deformed reference phase 4D-CBCT. Four lung cancer patients were scanned for 4 to 6 minutes to obtain approximately 2000 projections for each patient. To evaluate the performance of the SMEIR algorithm on a conventional 1-minute CBCT scan, the number of projections at each phase was reduced by a factor of 5, 8, or 10 for each patient. Then, 4D-CBCTs were reconstructed from the down-sampled projections using Feldkamp-Davis-Kress, total variation (TV) minimization, prior image constrained compressive sensing (PICCS), and SMEIR. Using the 4D-CBCT reconstructed from the fully sampled projections as a reference, the relative error (RE) of reconstructed images, root mean square error (RMSE), and maximum error (MaxE) of estimated tumor positions were analyzed to quantify the performance of the SMEIR algorithm. The SMEIR algorithm can achieve results consistent with the reference 4D-CBCT reconstructed with many more projections per phase. With an average of 30 to 40 projections per phase, the MaxE in tumor position detection is less than 1 mm in SMEIR for all 4 patients. The results from a limited number of patients show that SMEIR is a promising tool for high-quality 4D-CBCT reconstruction and tumor motion modeling. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 02/2015; 91(2):410-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.029 · 4.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationale and Objectives The assessment of regional ventilation is of critical importance when investigating lung function during disease progression and planning of pulmonary interventions. Recently, different computed tomography (CT)–based parameters have been proposed as surrogates of lung ventilation. The aim of the present study was to compare these parameters, namely variations of density (ΔHU), specific volume (sVol), and specific gas volume (ΔSVg) between different lung volumes, in relation to their topographic distribution within the lung. Materials and Methods Ten healthy volunteers were scanned via high-resolution CT at residual volume (RV) and total lung capacity (TLC); ΔHU, sVol, and ΔSVg were mapped voxel by voxel after registering TLC onto RV. Variations of the three parameters along the vertical and horizontal directions were analyzed. Results Along the vertical direction (from ventral to dorsal regions), a strong dependence on gravity was found in ΔHU and sVol, with greater values in the dorsal regions of the lung (P < .001), whereas ΔSVg was more homogeneously distributed within the lung. Conversely, along the caudocranial direction (from lung bases to apexes) where no gravitational gradient is present, the three parameters behaved similarly, with lower values at the apices. Conclusions ΔHU, sVol, and ΔSVg behave differently along the gravity direction. As the greater amount of air delivered to the dependent portion of the lung supplies a larger number of alveoli, the amount of gas delivered to alveoli compared to the mass of tissue is not gravity dependent. The minimization of gravity dependence in the distribution of ventilation when using ΔSVg suggests that this parameter is more reliable to discriminate healthy from pathologic regions.
    Academic Radiology 10/2014; 21(10). DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.022 · 2.08 Impact Factor