Depression of Married and Employed Women Based on Social-Role Theory

Department of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (Impact Factor: 0.38). 08/2012; 42(4):496-507. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.496
Source: PubMed


This study was based on social-role theory, and purposes were to investigate (1) how depression and health determinants vary with married and employed women, and (2) what factors contribute to depression according to family cycle.
A stratified convenience sample of 765 married and employed women was recruited during May to August 2010. Study variables of depression, socio-demographic threatening factors, psycho-stimulating factors, and social-role related factors were measured via a structured questionnaire.
Prevalence rate for depression was 18.6%, with highest rate (25.4%) from elementary laborers. Greater levels of depression were related to women's occupation, higher life stress, and poorer health; lower social support and vulnerable personality; higher levels of social-role related stress. From multivariate analysis, women with preadolescents were the most vulnerable to depression affected by occupation, life stress, personality, and parenting stress. These factors (except for occupational class) combined with economic status, social support, and housework unfairness were significant for depression in women with adolescents.
Depression among married and employed women differs by psycho-stimulating and social role relevant factors in addition to occupational class and family life cycle. Female elementary laborers and women with children need to have the highest prioritization for community mental health programs.

Download full-text


Available from: Sukhee Ahn, Apr 10, 2014
102 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although one of the most consistent findings in research on depression is a higher prevalence among women, the origins of this sex difference remain unclear. This study examines the relationship of family and work roles to sex differences in depression. The data for the study consist of interviews from a large-scale community survey (N=1,000) on the epidemiology of depression, conducted in Los Angeles County during 1979. Overall, the women were significantly more depressed than the men, but the extent of the sex difference varied according to the specific constellation of family and work roles. There were significant sex differences in depression among the two conditions of high family role demands: parents with children in the household, and single parents. The difference was not significant among parents whose children lived elsewhere, or among nonparents. Among parents with children in the household, employed men were less depressed than either employed women or homemakers; these two groups of women did not differ significantly from each other in depression level. The results suggest that family and work roles tend to be associated with reduced depression among both men and women, but that the effect is greater for men.
    Journal of Health and Social Behavior 01/1982; 22(4):379-93. DOI:10.2307/2136679 · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The British tradition of analysing differences in health has been dominated by class, with women belatedly entering this debate. The American tradition has been dominated by role analysis, with women's health considered primarily in terms of their marital, parental and employment roles, with recent research coming to contradictory conclusions. Research in both traditions has reached an impasse. This paper uses a sample of over 25,000 men and women from the 1985 and 1986 British General Household Survey to show how both traditions need to be reformulated and integrated. The ways in which family roles are associated with women's health status is determined by material circumstances, but the material circumstances cannot be captured by occupational class alone. Participation in the labour market and consumption divisions, in the form of housing tenure, are crucial additional indicators of structural disadvantage. Standardised limiting long-standing illness ratios and multivariate logit analysis confirm that occupational class and paid employment are the most important attributes associated with health status for women and men. Family roles are important for women; women without children and previously married women have particularly poor health status especially those not in paid employment and living in local authority housing.
    Social Science & Medicine 02/1991; 32(4):425-36. DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90344-C · 2.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The amended (revised) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA; Beck & Steer, 1993b) and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) were self-administered to 140 psychiatric outpatients with various psychiatric disorders. The coefficient alphas of the BDI-IA and the BDI-II were, respectively, .89 and .91. The mean rating for Sadness on the BDI-IA was higher than it was on the BDI-II, but the mean ratings for Past Failure, Self-Dislike, Change in Sleeping Pattern, and Change in Appetite were higher on the BDI-II than they were on the BDI-IA. The mean BDI-II total score was approximately 2 points higher than it was for the BDI-IA, and the outpatients also endorsed approximately one more symptom on the BDI-II than they did on the BDI-IA. The correlations of BDI-IA and BDI-II total scores with sex, ethnicity, age, the diagnosis of a mood disorder, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Beck & Steer, 1993a) were within 1 point of each other for the same variables.
    Journal of Personality Assessment 12/1996; 67(3):588-97. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13 · 2.01 Impact Factor
Show more