Gene therapy for adenosine deaminase-deficient severe combined immune deficiency: clinical comparison of retroviral vectors and treatment plans.

Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
Blood (Impact Factor: 10.43). 09/2012; DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-400937
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We conducted a gene therapy trial in 10 patients with adenosine deaminase-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency (ADA-deficient SCID) using two slightly different retroviral vectors for the transduction of patients' bone marrow CD34+ cells. Four subjects were treated without pre-transplant cytoreduction and remained on ADA enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) throughout the procedure. Only transient (months), low level (<0.01%) gene marking was seen in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of two older subjects (15 and 20 years old), whereas some gene marking of PBMC has persisted for the past nine years in two younger subjects (4 and 6 years). Six additional subjects were treated using the same gene transfer protocol, but after withdrawal of ERT and administration of low-dose busulfan (65-90 mg/m(2)). Three of these remain well, off ERT (5, 4, and 3 years post-procedure), with gene marking in PBMC of 1-10%, and ADA enzyme expression in PBMC near or in the normal range. Two subjects were restarted on ERT due to poor gene marking and immune recovery and one had a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. These studies directly demonstrate the importance of providing non-myeloablative pre-transplant conditioning to achieve therapeutic benefits with gene therapy for ADA-deficient SCID.

Download full-text


Available from: Kit L. Shaw, Apr 04, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recently, the gene therapy field has begun to experience clinical successes in a number of different diseases using various approaches and vectors. The Gene Therapy: Charting a Future Course workshop, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Biotechnology Activities, brought together early and mid-career researchers to discuss the key scientific challenges and opportunities, ethical and communication issues, and NIH and foundation resources available to facilitate further clinical advances.
    Human gene therapy 04/2014; DOI:10.1089/hum.2014.045 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • Blood 11/2012; 120(18):3628-9. DOI:10.1182/blood-2012-08-446559 · 10.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neutropenia is a feature of several primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs). Because of the diverse pathophysiologies of the PIDDs and the rarity of each disorder, data are often lacking, leading to the necessity of empiric treatment. Recent developments in the understanding of neutropenia in several of the PIDDs make a review of the data timely. RECENT FINDINGS: The category of severe congenital neutropenia continues to expand. Mutations in G6PC3 have been identified as the cause of neutropenia in a minority of previously molecularly undefined cases. Recent advances have broadened our understanding of the pathophysiology and the clinical expression of this disorder. A possible function of the C16orf57 gene has been hypothesized that may explain the clinical overlap between Clerucuzio-type poikiloderma with neutropenia and other marrow diseases. Plerixafor has been shown to be a potentially useful treatment in the warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infection, and myelokathexis syndrome. Investigations of patients with adenosine deaminase deficient severe combined immunodeficiency have identified neutropenia, and particularly susceptibility to myelotoxins, as a feature of this disorder. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor is the treatment of choice for neutropenia in PIDD, whereas hematopoietic cell transplantation is the only curative option. SUMMARY: The number of PIDDs associated with neutropenia has increased, as has our understanding of the range of phenotypes. Additional data and hypotheses have been generated helping to explain the diversity of presentations of neutropenia in PIDDs.
    Current opinion in hematology 11/2012; DOI:10.1097/MOH.0b013e32835aef1c · 4.05 Impact Factor