Causes and evaluation of chronic dyspnea

Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland , OR, USA.
American family physician (Impact Factor: 2.18). 07/2012; 86(2):173-82.
Source: PubMed


Chronic dyspnea is shortness of breath that lasts more than one month. The perception of dyspnea varies based on behavioral and physiologic responses. Dyspnea that is greater than expected with the degree of exertion is a symptom of disease. Most cases of dyspnea result from asthma, heart failure and myocardial ischemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, pneumonia, or psychogenic disorders. The etiology of dyspnea is multifactorial in about one-third of patients. The clinical presentation alone is adequate to make a diagnosis in 66 percent of patients with dyspnea. Patients' descriptions of the sensation of dyspnea may be helpful, but associated symptoms and risk factors, such as smoking, chemical exposures, and medication use, should also be considered. Examination findings (e.g., jugular venous distention, decreased breath sounds or wheezing, pleural rub, clubbing) may be helpful in making the diagnosis. Initial testing in patients with chronic dyspnea includes chest radiography, electrocardiography, spirometry, complete blood count, and basic metabolic panel. Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide levels may help exclude heart failure, and D-dimer testing may help rule out pulmonary emboli. Pulmonary function studies can be used to identify emphysema and interstitial lung diseases. Computed tomography of the chest is the most appropriate imaging study for diagnosing suspected pulmonary causes of chronic dyspnea. To diagnose pulmonary arterial hypertension or certain interstitial lung diseases, right heart catheterization or bronchoscopy may be needed.

4 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the assessment of dyspnea one has to take into account both the patient's own experience of the symptom and the clinicians observations of breathing rates, sounds and effort to get a complete picture. In addition, to choose appropriate treatment, the underlying cause of dyspnea needs to be assessed. While tools for clinical evaluation of heart failure have gained great interest in research and found a place in guidelines and clinical practice, the same cannot be said for instruments to assess patient self-reported dyspnea. To date, no specific dyspnea rating tool has been recommend over another. Reports from clinical practice are lacking and large; international studies in this field are warranted.
    Current Heart Failure Reports 06/2013; 10(3). DOI:10.1007/s11897-013-0141-0
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dyspnea is the uncomfortable awareness of difficult breathing. It is a common symptom in primary and nonprimary care settings. Although multiple disorders and diseases may cause breathlessness, the majority of the conditions are of cardiac or pulmonary origin. The challenge is to establish the diagnosis timely and with minimized investigations. Frequently, information about onset, progression, and circumstances of occurrence considerably narrow the underlying etiology. In most cases, a carefully taken history and a comprehensive physical examination lead to the correct diagnosis. Nevertheless, one should be aware of concomitant conditions and not be satisfied with a diagnosis if comorbidity may still be a candidate in causing dyspnea. Otherwise, it has been observed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was over-diagnosed in patients with systolic heart failure and dyspnea. A prudential use of investigating modalities for confirmation and exclusion of a questionable diagnosis is the key for allocating the correct therapy and achieving fast symptom relief in patients with dyspnea.
    Herz 02/2014; 39(1). DOI:10.1007/s00059-014-4057-6 · 0.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : Chronic dyspnea is the presence of shortness of breath lasting for a minimum of 4 weeks. It is a common complaint associated with many of the cardiopulmonary diseases seen in primary care. This article provides a systematic, evidence-based, and cost-effective approach to the evaluation of this complex symptom.
    The Nurse Practitioner 06/2014; 39(8). DOI:10.1097/01.NPR.0000451804.06582.5b
Show more