Article

Staging and outcome depending on surgical treatment in adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. .
British Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 4.84). 10/2012; 99(10):1406-14. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8884
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Owing to controversial staging and classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophago-gastric junction (AOG) before surgery, the choice of appropriate surgical approach remains problematic. In a retrospective study, preoperative staging of AOG and the impact of preoperative misclassification on outcome were analysed.
Data from patients with AOG were analysed from a prospectively collected database with regard to surgical treatment, preoperative and postoperative staging, and outcome.
One-hundred and thirty patients with Siewert types I and II AOG who did not have neoadjuvant treatment were included in the study: 41 patients with an AOG type I who underwent oesophagectomy, 51 patients with an AOG staged before surgery as type I who underwent oesophagectomy but in whom the final histology showed a type II tumour, and 38 patients whose tumours were staged as AOG type II before and after operation who underwent gastrectomy. Among patients who had an oesophagectomy, lymph node metastases (P = 0·022), tumour relapse (P = 0·009) and recurrent distant metastases (P = 0·028) were significantly more frequent in patients with AOG type II; those with AOG type II had shorter overall survival than those with type I tumours (P = 0·024). Among those with AOG type II, recurrence-free survival was significantly shorter after oesophagectomy compared with extended gastrectomy (P = 0·019). Thoracoabdominal oesophagectomy had a favourable influence on outcome compared with the transhiatal approach.
Accurate preoperative staging of AOG and appropriate surgical therapy are crucial for outcome. AOG type II is a more aggressive tumour with higher recurrence rates than AOG type I. These patients therefore benefit from more radical surgical treatment. Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
105 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Siewert classification has been used to plan treatment for tumours of the gastro-oesophageal junction since its proposal in the 1980s. The purpose of this study was to assess its continued relevance by evaluating whether there were differences in the biology and clinical characteristics of adenocarcinomas by Siewert type, in a contemporary cohort of patients, in whom the majority had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A prospective database was reviewed for all patients who underwent resection from 2005 to 2011 and analysed with regard to Siewert classification determined from the pathological specimen, treatment and clincopathological outcomes. Two hundred and sixteen patients underwent oesophagogastric resection: 133 for type I, 51 for type II and 33 for type III tumours. 135 Patients (62.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with no difference between groups. There were no significant differences in age, sex, pT stage, pN stage, pM stage, ASA, or inpatient complications between patients with adenocarcinoma based on their Siewert classification. There was a significant increase in maximum tumour diameter (P = 0.023), perineural invasion (P = 0.021) and vascular invasion (P = 0.020), associated with more distal tumours (Type III > Type II > Type I). Median overall survival was significantly shorter for more distal tumours (Type I: 4.96 years vs. Type II: 3.3 years vs. Type III: 2.64 years; P = 0.04). The surgical approach did not influence survival. In the era of multi-modal treatment pathological Siewert tumour type is of prognostic value, as patients with Type III disease are likely to have larger and more aggressive tumours that lead to worse outcomes. J. Surg. Oncol. © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Surgical Oncology 11/2013; 61. DOI:10.1002/jso.23484 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on Siewert classification, adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEGs) have different behaviors of perigastric-mediastinal nodal metastasis. Siewert type I AEGs have higher incidence of mediastinal nodal metastasis than those of type II or III, especially at middle-upper mediastinum. With regard to the necessity of mediastinal lymphadenectomy, theoretically, transthoracic esophagogastrectomy with complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy is suggested for Siewert type I AEGs, while transhiatal total gastrectomy with lower mediastinal and D2 perigastric lymphadenectomy is a standard surgery for type II-III AEGs. Nevertheless, the mediastinal nodal metastasis is an independent factor of poor prognosis for any type of AEG.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The optimal surgical treatment of patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction has not been established yet. To evaluate the surgical strategies to treat adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Databases Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for "adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction" AND ("surgery" OR "esophagectomy" OR "gastrectomy") or its synonyms or abbreviations. Only comparative studies that evaluated gastrectomy versus esophagectomy were included. In total 10 cohort studies comparing esophagectomy versus gastrectomy fulfilled the quality criteria. The R0 resection rates varied between 72-93% for esophagectomy and 62%-93% for gastrectomy. Morbidity was 33-39% after esophagectomy versus 11-54% after gastrectomy. The 30-day mortality ranged between 1.0-2.3 after esophagectomy and 1.8-2.7% after gastrectomy. At 6 months after surgery, health-related quality of life was higher after total gastrectomy than after esophagectomy. The 5-year survival rates varied between 30-42% for esophagectomy and 18-38% for gastrectomy, but were not significantly different. No clear oncologic benefit of either esophagectomy or gastrectomy in patients with adenomacarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction could be observed. However, gastrectomy seems to be accompanied with better quality of life. Future research should preferably consist of a multicenter RCT comparing esophagectomy and gastrectomy for adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Surgical Oncology 10/2014; 23(4):222-228. DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2014.10.004 · 2.37 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from