Article

Surveillance Definitions of Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities: Revisiting the McGeer Criteria

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 3.94). 10/2012; 33(10):965-77. DOI: 10.1086/667743
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT (See the commentary by Moro, on pages 978-980 .) Infection surveillance definitions for long-term care facilities (ie, the McGeer Criteria) have not been updated since 1991. An expert consensus panel modified these definitions on the basis of a structured review of the literature. Significant changes were made to the criteria defining urinary tract and respiratory tract infections. New definitions were added for norovirus gastroenteritis and Clostridum difficile infections.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Lona Mody, Nov 14, 2014
11 Followers
 · 
1,068 Views
  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 10/2012; 33(10):978-80. DOI:10.1086/667747 · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The Loeb minimum criteria (LMC), developed by a 2001 consensus conference, are minimum standards for initiation of antibiotics in long term care settings, intended to reduce inappropriate prescribing. This study examined the relationship between nursing home prescriber adherence to the LMC and antibiotic prescribing rates, overall and for each of three specific conditions (urinary tract infections, respiratory infections, and skin and soft tissue infections). DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis at the resident-day level. We estimated multivariate models adjusting for nursing home characteristics via multilevel Poisson regression, with robust standard errors to account for clustering of prescriptions within residents within nursing homes. SETTING: Data were collected through medical record abstraction in 12 North Carolina nursing homes between March and May 2011. PARTICIPANTS: In total, we identified 3381 antibiotic prescriptions across the 3-month observation period, representing 110,810 nursing home resident-days. In addition, we performed chart audits for a random sample of 653 prescriptions for urinary tract, respiratory, and skin and soft tissue infections to create measures of LMC adherence. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a count of prescriptions per resident per day, and the key explanatory variable was a nursing home-level estimate of the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions that adhered to the LMC. RESULTS: Only 12.7% of prescriptions were classified as LMC adherent, although there was substantial variation across study nursing homes (range: 4.8% to 22.0%) and by infection type (1.9% adherence for respiratory infections, 10.2% for urinary tract infections, and 42.7% for skin and soft tissue infections). We found no statistically significant relationship between adherence to the LMC and total prescribing rates (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.03; P = .84). Similarly, there was no significant relationship between LMC adherence and prescribing rates for treating urinary tract infections (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.02; P = .49), respiratory infections (IRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.08; P = .28), or skin and soft tissue infections (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.01; P = .39) considered alone. CONCLUSION: We found little evidence that prescribers in study nursing homes considered the LMC when making prescribing decisions. Further, we found no evidence that greater adherence to the LMC was associated with lower rates of antibiotic prescribing. Evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic initiation must be adopted more widely before any substantial gains from adherence are likely to be recognized.
    Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 02/2013; 14(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.002 · 4.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since 2012, the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) has also been collaborating with the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation, joining its Choosing Wisely campaign on two separate lists of Five Things Healthcare Providers and Patients Should Question. The campaign is designed to engage healthcare organizations and professionals, individuals, and family caregivers in discussions about the safety and appropriateness of medical tests, medications, and procedures. Participating healthcare providers are asked to identify five thingstests, medications, or proceduresthat appear to harm rather than help. Providers then share this information in a published article about these things on the ABIM campaign's website (). The first AGS list was published in February 2013.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 04/2013; 61(4):622-631. DOI:10.1111/jgs.12226 · 4.22 Impact Factor
Show more