Article

Outcomes from a US military neurology and traumatic brain injury telemedicine program

Correspondence & reprint requests to Dr. Tsao: .
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 09/2012; 79(12):1237-43. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826aac33
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study evaluated usage of the Army Knowledge Online (AKO) Telemedicine Consultation Program for neurology and traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases in remote overseas areas with limited access to subspecialists. We performed a descriptive analysis of quantity of consults, response times, sites where consults originated, military branches that benefitted, anatomic locations of problems, and diagnoses.
This was a retrospective analysis that searched electronic databases for neurology consults from October 2006 to December 2010 and TBI consults from March 2008 to December 2010.
A total of 508 consults were received for neurology, and 131 consults involved TBI. For the most part, quantity of consults increased over the years. Meanwhile, response times decreased, with a mean response time of 8 hours, 14 minutes for neurology consults and 2 hours, 44 minutes for TBI consults. Most neurology consults originated in Iraq (67.59%) followed by Afghanistan (16.84%), whereas TBI consults mainly originated from Afghanistan (40.87%) followed by Iraq (33.91%). The most common consultant diagnoses were headaches, including migraines (52.1%), for neurology cases and mild TBI/concussion (52.3%) for TBI cases. In the majority of cases, consultants recommended in-theater management. After receipt of consultant's recommendation, 84 known neurology evacuations were facilitated, and 3 known neurology evacuations were prevented.
E-mail-based neurology and TBI subspecialty teleconsultation is a viable method for overseas providers in remote locations to receive expert recommendations for a range of neurologic conditions. These recommendations can facilitate medically necessary patient evacuations or prevent evacuations for which on-site care is preferable.

2 Followers
 · 
72 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To review current literature on neurology telemedicine and to discuss its application to patient care, neurology practice, military medicine, and current federal policy. METHODS: Review of practice models and published literature on primary studies of the efficacy of neurology telemedicine. RESULTS: Teleneurology is of greatest benefit to populations with restricted access to general and subspecialty neurologic care in rural areas, those with limited mobility, and those deployed by the military. Through the use of real-time audio-visual interaction, imaging, and store-and-forward systems, a greater proportion of neurologists are able to meet the demand for specialty care in underserved communities, decrease the response time for acute stroke assessment, and expand the collaboration between primary care physicians, neurologists, and other disciplines. The American Stroke Association has developed a defined policy on teleneurology, and the American Academy of Neurology and federal health care policy are beginning to follow suit. CONCLUSIONS: Teleneurology is an effective tool for the rapid evaluation of patients in remote locations requiring neurologic care. These underserved locations include geographically isolated rural areas as well as urban cores with insufficient available neurology specialists. With this technology, neurologists will be better able to meet the burgeoning demand for access to neurologic care in an era of declining availability. An increase in physician awareness and support at the federal and state level is necessary to facilitate expansion of telemedicine into further areas of neurology.
    Neurology 02/2013; 80(7):670-676. DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182823361 · 8.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This article highlights the deployment of telemedicine by the U.S. Army through the various echelons of care and in overseas locations, including range and scope of health services provided by telemedicine in a challenging environment. This is followed by a discussion of technological developments advances in mobile communications likely to change the practice of telemedicine in the military from limited fixed-point access to a highly mobile individual with handheld communication devices.
    Telemedicine and e-Health 03/2013; 19(5). DOI:10.1089/tmj.2012.0297 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and purpose : Recent advances and the widespread availability of smartphones have ushered in a new wave of innovations in healthcare. Herein, we present our initial experience with Endockscope<sup>TM</sup>, a new docking system that optimizes the coupling of the iPhone 4S with modern endoscopes. Materials and Methods : Using the USAF resolution target, we compared the image resolution (line pairs/mm) of a flexible cystoscope coupled to the Endockscope<sup>TM</sup>+iPhone to the Storz HD camera (H3-Z Versatile). We then utilized the Munsell ColorChecker chart, to compare the color resolution with a 0<sup>o</sup> laparoscope. Furthermore, 12 expert endoscopists blindly compared and evaluated images from a porcine model using a cystoscope and ureteroscope for both systems. Finally, we also compared the cost (average of two company listed prices) and weight (lbs) of the two systems. Results : Overall, the image resolution allowed by the Endockscope<sup>TM</sup> was identical to the traditional HD camera (4.49 vs. 4.49 lp/mm). Red (∆E = 9.26 vs. 9.69) demonstrated better color resolution for iPhone, but green (∆E = 7.76 vs. 10.95), and blue (∆E = 12.35 vs. 14.66) revealed better color resolution with the Storz HD camera. Expert reviews of cystoscopic images acquired with the HD camera were superior in image, color and overall quality (p= 0.002, 0.042, and 0.003). In contrast, the ureteroscopic reviews yielded no statistical difference in image, color and overall (p=1, 0.203 and 0.120) quality. The overall cost of the Endockscope<sup>TM</sup>+ iPhone was $154 compared to $46,623 for a standard HD system. The weight of the mobile-coupled system was 0.47 lbs and 1.01 lbs for the Storz HD camera. Conclusion: Endockscope<sup>TM</sup> demonstrated feasibility of coupling endoscopes to a smartphone. The lighter and inexpensive Endockscope<sup>TM</sup> acquired images of same resolution and acceptable color resolution. When evaluated by expert endoscopists, the quality of the images overall were equivalent for flexible ureteroscopy and somewhat inferior, but still acceptable for flexible cystoscopy.
    Journal of endourology / Endourological Society 05/2013; 27(9). DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0286 · 2.10 Impact Factor
Show more