Article

Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (Impact Factor: 1.22). 07/2012; 94(5):318-26. DOI: 10.1308/003588412X13171221592410
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The terms 'enhanced recovery after surgery', 'enhanced recovery programme' (ERP) and 'fast track surgery' refer to multimodal strategies aiming to streamline peri-operative care pathways, to maximise effectiveness and minimise costs. While the results of ERP in colorectal surgery are well reported, there have been no reviews examining if these concepts could be applied safely to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the current evidence for ERP in HPB surgery.
A MEDLINE ® literature search was undertaken using the keywords 'enhanced recovery', 'fast-track', 'peri-operative', 'surgery', 'pancreas' and 'liver' and their derivatives such as 'pancreatic' or 'hepatic'. The primary endpoint was length of post-operative hospital stay. Secondary endpoints were morbidity, mortality and readmission rate.
Ten articles were retrieved describing an ERP. ERP protocols varied slightly between studies. A reduction in length of stay was a consistent finding following the incorporation of ERP when compared with historical controls. This was not at the expense of increased rates of readmission, morbidity or mortality in any study.
The introduction of an ERP in HPB surgery appears safe and feasible. Currently, many of the principles of the multimodal pathway are derived from the colorectal ERP and distinct differences exist, which may impede its implementation in HPB surgery.

Full-text

Available from: Thomas Hall, May 06, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can decrease complications and reduces hospital stay. Less certain is whether elderly patients can fully adhere to and benefit from ERAS. We aimed to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy of enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery in patients aged ≥65 years old. Method A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane (was performed to identify: (1) studies comparing elderly patients managed with ERAS versus traditional care, (2) cohort studies of ERAS with results of elderly versus younger patients, and (3) any case series of ERAS in elderly patients. End points of interest were length of hospital stay, complications, mortality, readmission and re-operation, and ERAS protocol adherence. Results Sixteen studies were included. Two randomised controlled trials demonstrated shorter hospital stay in elderly patients with ERAS compared to elderly patients with non-ERAS (9 vs 13.2 days; P<0.001 and 5.5 vs 7 days; P<0.0001). Fewer complications occurred with ERAS in both RCTs (27.4% vs 58.6%; P<0.0001, and 5% vs 21.1%; P=0.045). The majority of observational studies did not show differences in outcome between elderly and younger patients in terms of hospital stay, morbidity or mortality. Inconsistent findings between cohort studies may reflect the disparities in ERAS protocol definitions or differences in study populations. Conclusion ERAS can be safely applied to elderly patients to reduce complications and shorten length of hospital stay. Further studies are required to assess if elderly patients are able to adhere to, and benefit from, ERAS protocols to the same extent as younger patients.
    Colorectal Disease 07/2014; 16(12). DOI:10.1111/codi.12718 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: This study examined the risk factors associated with failure of enhanced recovery protocol after major hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) surgery. Setting and participants: A retrospective cohort of 194 adult patients undergoing major HBP surgery at a university hospital in Hong Kong was followed up for 30 days. The patients were from a larger cohort study of 736 consecutive adults with preoperative urinary cotinine concentration to examine the association between passive smoking and risk of perioperative respiratory complications and postoperative morbidities. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was failure of enhanced recovery protocol. This was defined as a composite measure of the following events: intensive care unit (ICU) stay more than 24 h after surgery, unplanned admission to ICU within 30 days after surgery, hospital readmission, reoperation and mortality. Results: There were 25 failures of enhanced recovery after HBP surgery (12.9%, 95% CI 8.5% to 18.4%). After adjusting for elective ICU admission, smokers (relative risk (RR) 2.21, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.46), high preoperative alanine transaminase/glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (RR 3.55,95% CI 1.68 to 7.49) and postoperative morbidities (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.56) were associated with failures of enhanced recovery in the generalised estimating equation risk model. Compared with those managed successfully, failures stayed longer in ICU (median 19 vs 25 h, p<0.001) and in hospital for postoperative care (median 7 vs 13 days, p=0.003). Conclusions: Smokers and patients having high preoperative alanine transaminase/glutamic-pyruvic transaminase concentration or have a high risk of postoperative morbidities are likely to fail enhanced recovery protocol in HBP surgery programmes.
    BMJ Open 07/2014; 4(7):e005330. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005330 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the evidence on the impact of enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing elective surgery in acute hospital settings in the UK.
    BMJ Open 07/2014; 4(7):e005015. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005015 · 2.06 Impact Factor