Food Insecurity Is Associated with Obesity among US Adults in 12 States

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, K-26, GA 30341, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Impact Factor: 3.47). 09/2012; 112(9):1403-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.011
Source: PubMed


A redesigned food insecurity question that measured food stress was included in the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in the Social Context optional module. The objective of our study was to examine the association between food stress and obesity using this question as a surrogate for food insecurity. Our analytic sample included 66,553 adults from 12 states. Food insecurity was determined by response (always/usually/sometimes) to the question, "How often in the past 12 months would you say you were worried or stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals?" T tests were used to compare prevalence differences between groups, and logistic regression was used to examine the association between food insecurity and obesity. Among the 12 states, the prevalence of obesity was 27.1% overall, 25.2% among food secure adults, and 35.1% among food insecure adults. Food insecure adults had 32% increased odds of being obese compared to food secure adults. Compared with food secure adults, food insecure adults had significantly higher prevalence of obesity in the following population subgroups: adults ages ≥30 years, women, non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, adults with some college education or a college degree, a household income of <$25,000 or $50,000 to $74,999, and adults with none or two children in their households. One in three food insecure adults were obese. Food insecurity was associated with obesity in the overall population and most population subgroups. These findings are consistent with previous research and highlight the importance of increasing access to affordable healthy foods for all adults.

1 Follower
22 Reads
    • "Food insecurity occurs in all low-, middleand high-income countries [1], making it a global public-health burden. Numerous studies have demonstrated the association between food insecurity and poorer health, including increased obesity [3], metabolic syndrome [4], diabetes mellitus [5] [6], and several chronic diseases [7]. Food insecure individuals may preferentially purchase inexpensive, energy-dense foods because of their lower cost [8], which can result in increased consumption of saturated fat and refined carbohydrates and decreased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine gender-specific associations between food insecurity and insulin resistance in a representative U.S. Data on 5533 adults of 20 years of age or more (2742 men and 2791 women) without diabetes from the 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. Respondents were categorized as having full, marginal, low, or very low food security using a validated scale. Insulin-resistant individuals were defined as those with a homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance value 2.5 or more. Insulin resistance was higher in both normal-weight (P = .001) and overweight or obese (P < .001) women with lower food security, but no linear trend was found in men. In multiple logistic regression analyses, however, very low food security-compared with full food security-was associated with insulin resistance in normal-weight men (odds ratio, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.71-9.33), and marginal food insecurity was associated with insulin resistance in overweight or obese men (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.64) after adjusting for potential confounders. In women, the association between food insecurity and insulin resistance was no longer significant after adjustment. Food insecurity is associated with insulin resistance in adults without diabetes, and this effect varies by gender in normal-weight and overweight or obese populations. Improving food security status may help reduce insulin resistance, an underlying risk factor for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Annals of epidemiology 06/2015; 25(9). DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.06.003 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Among adults, food insecurity has also been shown to be associated with obesity. Compared with food secure adults, food insecure adults had significantly higher rates of obesity if they were women ≥30 years of age, non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, or had a household income of < $25,000 [4]. Other measures of SES, such as residential property values also provide support for this association between SES and obesity rates in the US. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite high obesity prevalence rates, few low-income midlife women participate in weight loss maintenance trials. This pilot study aims to assess the effectiveness of two weight loss maintenance interventions in this under-represented population. Low-income midlife women who completed a 16-week weight loss intervention and lost >= 8 lbs (3.6 kg) were eligible to enroll in one of two 12-month maintenance programs. The programs were similar in content and had the same number of total contacts, but were different in the contact modality (Phone + Face-to-Face vs. Face-to-Face Only). Two criteria were used to assess successful weight loss maintenance at 12 months: (1) retaining a loss of >= 5% of body weight from the start of the weight loss phase and (2) a change in body weight of < 3%, from the start to the end of the maintenance program. Outcome measures of changes in physiologic and psychosocial factors, and evaluations of process measures and program acceptability (measured at 12 months) are also reported. For categorical variables, likelihood ratio or Fisher's Exact (for small samples) tests were used to evaluate statistically significant relationships; for continuous variables, t-tests or their equivalents were used to assess differences between means and also to identify correlates of weight loss maintenance. Overall, during the 12-month maintenance period, 41% (24/58) of participants maintained a loss of >= 5% of initial weight and 43% (25/58) had a <3% change in weight. None of the comparisons between the two maintenance programs were statistically significant. However, improvements in blood pressure and dietary behaviors remained significant at the end of the 12-month maintenance period for participants in both programs. Participant attendance and acceptability were high for both programs. The effectiveness of two pilot 12-month maintenance interventions provides support for further research in weight loss maintenance among high-risk, low-income women.Trial Identifier: NCT00288301.
    BMC Public Health 07/2013; 13(1):653. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-653 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "By combining 10 years of data, we ascertained enough cases to adjust for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables. We used a conservative analytic strategy that included factors, such as BMI, that might plausibly be on the causal pathway between food insecurity and metabolic control (28) and a robust set of controls, yet still detected a significantly increased risk for poor metabolic control in food-insecure participants. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE We sought to determine whether food insecurity is associated with worse glycemic, cholesterol, and blood pressure control in adults with diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from participants of the 1999-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. All adults with diabetes (type 1 or type 2) by self-report or diabetes medication use were included. Food insecurity was measured by the Adult Food Security Survey Module. The outcomes of interest were proportion of patients with HbA1c >9.0% (75 mmol/mol), LDL cholesterol >100 mg/dL, and systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg. We used multivariable logistic regression for analysis.RESULTSAmong the 2,557 adults with diabetes in our sample, a higher proportion of those with food insecurity (27.0 vs. 13.3%, P < 0.001) had an HbA1c >9.0% (75 mmol/mol). After adjustment for age, sex, educational attainment, household income, insurance status and type, smoking status, BMI, duration of diabetes, diabetes medication use and type, and presence of a usual source of care, food insecurity remained significantly associated with poor glycemic control (odds ratio [OR] 1.53 [95% CI 1.07-2.19]). Food insecurity was also associated with poor LDL control before (68.8 vs. 49.8, P = 0.002) and after (1.86 [1.01-3.44]) adjustment. Food insecurity was not associated with blood pressure control.CONCLUSIONS Food insecurity is significantly associated with poor metabolic control in adults with diabetes. Interventions that address food security as well as clinical factors may be needed to successfully manage chronic disease in vulnerable adults.
    Diabetes care 06/2013; 36(10). DOI:10.2337/dc13-0570 · 8.42 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications