Article

Patient safety incidents from acupuncture treatments: a review of reports to the National Patient Safety Agency.

Patient Safety Division, National Patient Safety Agency, London, UK.
The International journal of risk & safety in medicine 01/2012; 24(3):163-9. DOI: 10.3233/JRS-2012-0569
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Acupuncture is frequently employed to treat chronic pain syndromes or other chronic conditions. Nevertheless, there is a growing literature on adverse events (AEs) from treatments including pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade and spinal cord injury. Acupuncture is provided in almost all NHS pain clinics and by an increasing number of GP's and physiotherapists. Considering acupuncture's popularity, its safety has become an important public health issue.
To evaluate the harm caused to patients through acupuncture treatments within NHS organisations.
The National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) database was searched for incidents reported from 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2011. The free text fields of all reports received from all healthcare settings and specialties were searched for the keyword 'acupuncture'. All relevant incidents were reviewed to provide a qualitative theme of the harm to patients. Results: 468 patient safety incidents were identified; 325 met our inclusion criteria for analysis. Adverse events reported include retained needles (31%), dizziness (30%), loss of consciousness/unresponsive (19%), falls (4%), Bruising or soreness at needle site (2%), Pneumothorax (1%) and other adverse reactions (12%). The majority (95%) of the incidents were categorised as low or no harm.
A number of AEs are recorded after acupuncture treatments in the NHS but the majority is not severe. However, miscategorisation and under-reporting may distort the overall picture. Acupuncture practitioners should be aware of, and be prepared to manage, any significant harm from treatments.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
94 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recurrent or persistent low back pain is common after back surgery but is typically not well controlled. Previous randomised controlled trials on non-acute pain after back surgery were flawed. In this article, the design and protocol of a randomised controlled trial to treat pain and improve function after back surgery are described. This study is a pilot randomised, active-controlled, assessor-blinded trial. Patients with recurring or persistent low back pain after back surgery, defined as a visual analogue scale value of ≥50 mm, with or without leg pain, will be randomly assigned to an electroacupuncture-plus-usual-care group or to a usual-care-only group. Patients assigned to both groups will have usual care management, including physical therapy and patient education, twice a week during a 4-week treatment period that would begin at randomisation. Patients assigned to the electroacupuncture-plus-usual-care group will also have electroacupuncture twice a week during the 4-week treatment period. The primary outcome will be measured with the 100 mm pain visual analogue scale of low back pain by a blinded evaluator. Secondary outcomes will be measured with the EuroQol 5-Dimension and the Oswestry Disability Index. The primary and secondary outcomes will be measured at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Pusan National University Korean Hospital in September 2013 (IRB approval number 2013012). The study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. This trial was registered with the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry: NCT01966250. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
    BMJ Open 02/2015; 5(2):e007031. · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Da starke klimakterische Beschwerden nur bei etwa einem Drittel der Frauen in der Peri- und Postmenopause auftreten, ist eine Behandlung nicht für jede Frau erforderlich, die Prävention altersassoziierter Erkrankungen dagegen ist für alle sinnvoll. Klassische Naturheilverfahren und Komplementärmedizin bieten viele Möglichkeiten zur Selbsthilfe und sind sowohl zur Prävention als auch zur Besserung verschiedener Symptome geeignet. Da bei (Selbst-)Anwendung nichtpharmakologischer Verfahren kein Risiko für Arzneimittelinteraktionen besteht und das sonstige Risikopotenzial gering ist, lassen sie sich auch bei nicht umfassender Evidenz vorrangig empfehlen. Bei jeder Anwendung wirkstoffbasierter Behandlungen ist die ärztliche Überwachung ratsam, da grundsätzlich ein Risiko- und Interaktionspotenzial besteht, die vorhandene Evidenz i.d.R. nur auf kurzen Therapiezeiten basiert und bei Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln statusbedingt mit Qualitätsproblemen zu rechnen ist. Das Vorgehen sollte sich im Rahmen eines Stufenkonzepts an Art und Ausprägung der Beschwerden sowie an den individuellen Risiken, Möglichkeiten und Vorerfahrungen orientieren.
    Der Gynäkologe 03/2013; 46(3).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract: Introduction: Neck pain is common, can be disabling and is costly to society. Physical modalities are often included in neck rehabilitation programs. Interventions may include thermal, electrotherapy, ultrasound, mechanical traction, laser and acupuncture. Definitive knowledge regarding optimal modalities and dosage for neck pain management is limited. Purpose: To systematically review existing literature to establish the evidence-base for recommendations on physical modalities for acute to chronic neck pain. Methods: A comprehensive computerized and manual search strategy from January 2000 to July 2012, systematic review methodological quality assessment using AMSTAR, qualitative assessment using a GRADE approach and recommendation presentation was included. Systematic or meta-analyses of studies evaluating physical modalities were eligible. Independent assessment by at least two review team members was conducted. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results: Of 103 reviews eligible, 20 were included and 83 were excluded. Short term pain relief - Moderate evidence of benefit: acupuncture, intermittent traction and laser were shown to be better than placebo for chronic neck pain. Moderate evidence of no benefit: pulsed ultrasound, infrared light or continuous traction was no better than placebo for acute whiplash associated disorder, chronic myofascial neck pain or subacute to chronic neck pain. There was no added benefit when hot packs were combined with mobilization, manipulation or electrical muscle stimulation for chronic neck pain, function or patient satisfaction at six month follow-up. Conclusions: The current state of the evidence favours acupuncture, laser and intermittent traction for chronic neck pain. Some electrotherapies show little benefit for chronic neck pain. Consistent dosage, improved design and long term follow-up continue to be the recommendations for future research.
    The Open Orthopaedics Journal 09/2013; The Open Orthopaedics Journal(Suppl 4: M6):440-460.