20-year survival after radical prostatectomy as initial treatment for cT3 prostate cancer
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To present long-term survival outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with cT3 prostate cancer, as the optimal treatment for patients with clinical T3 prostate cancer is debated. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified 843 men who underwent RP for cT3 tumours between 1987 and 1997. Survival was estimated using the KaplanMeier method. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association of clinicopathological features with outcome RESULTS The median (range) postoperative follow-up was 14.3 (0.123.5) years. Down-staging to pT2 disease occurred in 26% (223/843) at surgery. Local recurrence-free, systemic progression-free and cancer-specific survival for men with cT3 prostate cancer after RP was 76%, 72%, and 81%, respectively, at 20 years. On multivariate analysis, increasing RP Gleason score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; P= 0.01), non-diploid chromatin content (HR 1.8; P= 0.01), positive surgical margins (HR 2.1; P= 0.007), and seminal vesicle invasion (HR 2.1; P= 0.005) were associated with a significant risk of prostate cancer death, while a more recent year of surgery was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.88; P= 0.01) CONCLUSIONS RP affords accurate pathological staging and may be associated with durable cancer control for cT3 prostate cancer, with 20 years of follow-up presented here. RP as part of a multimodal treatment strategy therefore remains a viable treatment option for patients with cT3 tumours.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical stage has been incorporated into multiple risk stratification models for patients with newly-diagnosed prostate cancer. However, the independent prognostic value of this variable remains in debate. Here, then, we evaluated the association of clinical stage with death from prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy, and assessed for changes in its prognostic value over time. METHODS: We reviewed 14,842 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between 1970 and 2008 without preoperative hormone or radiation therapy. Postoperative disease recurrence was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the association of clinical stage with outcome. RESULTS: In total, 5,725 (38.6%)men were classified as cT1, 8,160 (55.0%) cT2 tumors, and 957 (6.4%) cT3. On univariate analysis, clinical stage was significantly associated with postoperative biochemical recurrence, systemic progression, and death from prostate cancer (p<0.001 for each). Moreover, on multivariate analysis clinical stage was significantly associated with cancer death both for patients treated before (1.45, p=0.006) and during (1.92, p>0.001) the PSA era. Furthermore, incorporation of clinical stage into contemporary risk stratification improves prediction of cancer-specific survival (c statistic - 0.782 without and 0.802 with clinical stage). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical stage is significantly associated with systemic progression and death from prostate cancer. Inclusion of this variable into multivariate prediction models improves prediction of systemic progression and cancer specific survival.The Journal of urology 11/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.065 · 3.75 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostate cancer remains the commonest nondermatological cause of cancer in Western men and the second leading cause of cancer death in these men. While low and intermediate-risk prostate cancers make up the vast bulk of prostate cancer diagnoses, it is high-risk prostate cancer that is a much larger killer. Management paradigms for such disease are changing and thus we review the current state of play with the management of these cancers and what the future might hold. RECENT FINDINGS: High-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous beast, with huge variations in disease severity. Hence, management of these cases must be tailored based on specific risk factors of individual patients, and the role for surgery especially in the lower end of the spectrum is increasing. SUMMARY: The increasing use of radical extirpative surgery might negatively impact functional outcomes but are likely to prolong lives of high-risk prostate cancer sufferers, though more research from well conducted randomized controlled trials is needed to exactly define which patient subpopulations should receive which therapies, in which orders, and at what times.Current opinion in urology 05/2013; 23(4). DOI:10.1097/MOU.0b013e328361ebea · 2.12 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Surgery for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is applied frequently nowadays. Nevertheless, this approach is still surrounded by many controversies. The present review discusses the most recent literature regarding surgery for high-risk PCa. RECENT FINDINGS: As there is no standard definition of high-risk PCa, outcome comparison between series and treatment approaches is hampered. Nevertheless, recent radical prostatectomy series have shown excellent cancer-specific survival in patients with high-risk PCa. Even for very-high-risk PCa (cT3b-T4 or any cT, N1), surgery may be applied to highly selected patients as a first step of a multimodality approach. Recent experience with robot-assisted surgery opens new possibilities for a minimally invasive approach in this field.Patient selection for surgery was also addressed in recent studies. Excellent cancer-specific survival is seen when specimen-confined PCa is found at final histopathology; a recently published nomogram enables the prediction of specimen-confined disease. Another issue in high-risk PCa is the impact of age and comorbidities on cancer-specific and overall mortality. In a recent study, it was shown that patients with low comorbidity scores, even when at least 70 years old, had a significant risk of dying from their cancer and may benefit most from a surgical approach. A modified extended pelvic lymphadenectomy template was presented, providing optimal removal of positive lymph nodes. SUMMARY: Radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy delivers very good cancer-related outcomes in high-risk and very-high-risk PCa, often within a multimodal approach. Minimally invasive surgery and improved patient selection will be key to further improve oncological and functional outcomes.Current opinion in urology 05/2013; 23(4). DOI:10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283620f60 · 2.12 Impact Factor