Cobedding and Recovery Time After Heel Lance in Preterm Twins: Results of a Randomized Trial

Women’s and Newborn Health Program, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 08/2012; 130(3):500-6. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0010
Source: PubMed


Cobedding of preterm twin infants provides tactile, olfactory, and auditory stimulation and may affect pain reactivity. We carried out a randomized trial to assess the effect of cobedding on pain reactivity and recovery in preterm twin neonates.
Stable preterm twins (n = 67 sets) between 28 and 36 weeks of gestational age were randomly assigned to a cobedding group (cared for in the same incubator or crib) or a standard care group (cared for in separate incubators or cribs). Pain response (determined by the Premature Infant Pain Profile [PIPP]) and time to return to physiologic baseline parameters were compared between groups with adjustment for the nonindependence of twin infants.
Maternal and infant characteristics were not significantly different between twin infants in the cobedding and standard care groups except for 5-minute Apgar <7 and postnatal age and corrected gestational age on the day of the heel lance. Mean PIPP scores were not different between groups at 30, 60, or 120 seconds. At 90 seconds, mean PIPP scores were higher in the cobedding group (6.0 vs 5.0, P = .04). Recovery time was shorter in the cobedding group compared with the standard care group, (mean = 75.6 seconds versus 142.1 seconds, P = .001). No significant adverse events were associated with cobedding. Adjustment for nonindependence between twins and differences in baseline characteristics did not change the results.
Cobedding enhanced the physiologic recovery of preterm twins undergoing heel lance, but did not lead to lower pain scores.

1 Follower
12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preterm twins are at high risk for growth and developmental problems. Co-bedding (placement of twins in the same cot or incubator) has been proposed to benefit twins because it simulates the environment they share prior to birth, in which the twins support each other through a series of observed activities, termed "coregulation". These activities have been proposed to promote growth and brain development if they are allowed to continue after birth. However, there may be risks in placing twins in the same incubator or cot, including caregiver errors and infections. In this review, we planned to put together evidence on the benefits and risks of co-bedding stable preterm twins. This review found five, mostly small studies with some limitations in their methods. Overall, there were no differences between the co-bedded group and the group receiving care separately in terms of weight gain, episodes of major disturbances in their breathing, heart rate or oxygenation level (apnoea, bradycardia or desaturation episodes), length of hospital stay and infections. As the overall quality of evidence was low, we could not make any recommendation for or against co-bedding for stable preterm twins in neonatal nursery. Further research is needed in this field.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 12/2012; 12(12):CD008313. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008313.pub2 · 6.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the effect of co-bedding between preterm twins on stress response following heel lance. Using a multisite randomized controlled trial design, stable preterm twins (67 sets, N=134 infants) between 28 and 36 completed week's gestational age, stratified by gestational age (less than or equal to and greater than 32 weeks) and site, were randomly assigned to a co-bedding group, cared for continuously in the same incubator or crib or a standard care group, cared for in a separate incubator or crib, and underwent a medically indicated heel lance following at least 24 hours and no greater than 10 days of group allocation. The reported outcome was cortisol from saliva samples from 89 twins (n=49 co-bedding, n=40 standard care) collected immediately prior to the heel lance (baseline levels) and 113 twins (n=58 co-bedding, n=55 standard care) collected twenty minutes post heel lance (stress levels) as an index of stress response. No group differences were noted in baseline salivary cortisol levels: 0.36▒ug/dL (SD 0.25) in the co-bedding group and 0.43▒ug/dL (SD 0.50) in the standard care group. Twenty minutes post lance, levels were significantly lower in the co-bedding group, 0.28▒ug/dL (SD 0.25) versus 0.50▒ug/dL (SD 0.73) in the standard group (P=0.04). Similarly, the mean of paired changes in salivary cortisol from baseline was lower in the co-bedding group, -0.06▒ug/dL compared to the standard care group, 0.14▒ug/dL, P<0.05. Co-bedding attenuates the stress response of preterm twins undergoing heel lance. Identifier: NCT009176.
    The Clinical journal of pain 11/2013; 30(7). DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000015 · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The purpose of this trial was to determine whether cobedding of preterm twins has analgesic effects during heel lancing or not. Methods: One hundred premature twins (50 sets) born between 26 weeks’ and 34 weeks’ gestation undergoing heel blood sampling were randomly assigned into two groups: the cobed- ding group (receiving care in the same incubator) and the standard care group (receiving care in separate incubators). Pain was assessed using the premature infant pain profile score. Dura- tion of crying was measured after heel blood sampling, and salivary cortisol was measured prior to and after heel blood sampling. Results: Infants in the standard care group cried for a longer time during heel lancing than those in the cobedding group (42.6 � 19.8 seconds vs. 36.4 � 21.7 seconds, p Z 0.03). The mean premature infant pain profile score after heel lancing was significantly higher in the stan- dard care group (9.8 � 2.6 vs. 8.06 � 2.8, p Z 0.002). The mean salivary cortisol after heel lancing was also significantly higher in the standard care group (24.3 � 7.4 nmol/L vs. 20.8 � 7.4 nmol/L, p Z 0.02). No significant adverse effects were seen with cobedding. Conclusion: Cobedding is a comforting measure for twin premature infants during heel lancing, which can be performed without any significant adverse effects.
    Pediatrics & Neonatology 01/2014; · 1.23 Impact Factor
Show more