Dynamic Breast MRI: Does Lower Temporal Resolution Negatively Affect Clinical Kinetic Analysis?

Department of Radiology, Group Health, Tacoma Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98405, USA.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.73). 09/2012; 199(3):703-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7836
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in kinetic assessments of lesions at breast MRI performed with higher and lower temporal resolution.
All consecutively evaluated BI-RADS category 4, 5, and 6 lesions imaged with breast MRI and pathologically confirmed from October 2005 to August 2009 were identified. Patients underwent MRI with one of two dynamic contrast-enhanced protocols: one with 90-second (October 2005-June 2006) and another with 180-second (July 2006-August 2009) temporal resolution. Studies were processed with a computer-aided evaluation system with initial and delayed contrast-enhanced time points with the k-space centered 90 and 450 seconds after contrast injection. Initial-phase peak enhancement, delayed-phase predominant curve type, and worst curve type were recorded and compared for benign and malignant lesions across protocols.
The analysis set comprised 993 lesions: 145 imaged with the 90-second acquisition (17 benign, 28 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], 100 invasive cancer) and 848 imaged with the 180-second acquisition (212 benign, 145 DCIS, 491 invasive cancer). Peak enhancement was significantly higher for both benign lesions (p = 0.01) and invasive cancers (p = 0.0008) with the 180-second protocol. Peak enhancement of DCIS was similar in the two protocols (p = 0.88). Delayed-phase kinetics were similar for the two protocols for both benign and malignant lesions when defined by predominant or worst curve type.
Although it has lower temporal resolution, a 180-second acquisition may be preferable because it allows higher spatial resolution and captures higher initial-phase peak enhancement without loss of delayed-phase kinetic information.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The feasibility of implementing image subtraction in through-transmission breast sonography was examined. Acoustic mammograms of women with suspicious findings were obtained using through-transmission imaging. Precontrast images were initially acquired. Then a perflutren liquid microsphere contrast agent solution was injected intravenously, and new sets of images were acquired. Precontrast-postcontrast subtraction images depicting the resulting changes were then obtained and visually compared with other imaging modalities. The ability to detect changes stemming from contrast agent injection in the through-transmission mode was verified. The comparability with x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance imaging was shown. Finally, the ability to compare images obtained before and several months after surgery was confirmed.
    Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 05/2013; 32(5):825-33. DOI:10.7863/ultra.32.5.825 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare two fat suppression methods in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 T: the two-point Dixon method and the frequency selective inversion method. Forty female patients with breast cancer underwent contrast-enhanced three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T. Both the two-point Dixon method and the frequency selective inversion method were applied. Quantitative analyses of the residual fat signal-to-noise ratio and the contrast noise ratio (CNR) of lesion-to-breast parenchyma, lesion-to-fat, and parenchyma-to-fat were performed. Qualitative analyses of the uniformity of fat suppression, image contrast, and the visibility of breast lesions and axillary metastatic adenopathy were performed. The signal-to-noise ratio was significantly lower in the two-point Dixon method (P < 0.001). All CNR values were significantly higher in the two-point Dixon method (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). According to qualitative analysis, both the uniformity of fat suppression and image contrast with the two-point Dixon method were significantly higher (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Visibility of breast lesions and metastatic adenopathy was significantly better in the two-point Dixon method (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). The two-point Dixon method suppressed the fat signal more potently and improved contrast and visibility of the breast lesions and axillary adenopathy.
    Japanese journal of radiology 06/2013; 31(9). DOI:10.1007/s11604-013-0230-8 · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • Source

Show more

Similar Publications