Is the "impact factor" a valid measure of the impact of research published in Clinical Neurophysiology and Muscle & Nerve?
Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia.Muscle & Nerve (Impact Factor: 2.31). 09/2012; 46(3):309-12. DOI: 10.1002/mus.23608
Article: Reply.Muscle & Nerve 05/2012; DOI:10.1002/mus.23457 · 2.31 Impact Factor
- Muscle & Nerve 12/2012; 46(6):979. DOI:10.1002/mus.23679 · 2.31 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Evidence-based medicine offers explicit methods to evaluate the evidence grades of literature. However, evidence grades do not meet all the practical needs of physicians. This study is aimed to develop a convenient method for evaluating the clinical value of medical literature from the perspective of the clinician. A literature applicability equation was formulated through the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process. A consistency check was used to ascertain the efficacy of the formula. Three senior clinicians assessed 30 articles based on their clinical experiences and subjective opinions, while one independent researcher performed independent assessments of the applicability of 30 articles using the evaluation formula. The literature applicability equation was Y = 3.93X1 + 11.78X2 + 14.83X3 + 44.53X4 + 24.93X5, where Y = literature applicability, X1 = years since publication, X2 = target question covered or not, X3 = sample size, X4 = study type, and X5 = journal quality. Consistency index (CI) values for the first-level indicator ("literature applicability") and the second-level indicators ("pertinence and timeliness" and "quality of results") were 0.0325, 0.0012, and 0.0001, respectively. The weights used to calculate the matrix indicators had satisfactory accordance (random coincidence coefficient = 0.056). A consistency check for the efficacy of the formula revealed kappa = 0.749 and P < .001. Conclusion : The developed and validated literature applicability evaluation formula may be a useful and convenient tool for identifying clinically valuable medical literature.Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Online 11/2014; 30(6):1377-82. DOI:10.12669/pjms.306.5450 · 0.23 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.