Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care

Department of Intensive Care, Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Narbonne, Bd Dr Lacroix, F-11100 Narbonne, France.
BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia (Impact Factor: 4.35). 08/2012; 109(6). DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes298
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: /st>The esCCO monitor (ECG- estimated Continuous Cardiac Output, Nihon Kohden(®)) is a new non-invasive tool for estimating cardiac output (CO). It derives CO from the pulse wave transit time (PWTT) estimated by the ECG and the plethysmographic wave. An initial calibration is needed to refine the relation linking pulse pressure (measured by arterial pressure cuff) to PWTT. To assess the accuracy and reliability of the esCCO system, we performed an analysis of agreement of CO values obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHODS: /st>Thirty-eight intensive care unit patients were prospectively included. CO was determined simultaneously using esCCO (CO(esCCO)) and TTE (CO(TTE)) as our reference method. RESULTS: /st>A total of 103 paired readings from 38 patients were collected. The correlation coefficient between CO(esCCO) and CO(TTE) was 0.61 (P<0.001). The Bland and Altman analysis corrected for repeated measures showed a bias of -1.6 litre min(-1) and limits of agreement from -4.7 to +1.5 litre min(-1), with a percentage error (2 sd/mean CO) of 49%. The correlation for CO changes was significant (R=0.63, P<0.001), but the concordance rate was poor (73%). Polar plot analysis showed an angular bias of -9° with radial limits of agreement from -54° to +36°. The bias appeared to correlate with systemic vascular resistance (R=-0.45, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: /st>In critically ill patients, the performance of the esCCO monitor was not clinically acceptable, and this monitor cannot be recommended in this setting. Moreover, the esCCO failed to trend CO data reliably.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Une littérature relativement abondante existe concernant la pertinence des paramètres dynamiques à prédire en péri-opératoire une réponse au remplissage. Basés sur l’interaction cardiopulmonaire, ces différents paramètres présentent des sérieuses limitations d’utilisation dont l’application d’une ventilation protectrice à faible volume courant. Parce que cette stratégie semble être bénéfique chez des patients à poumons sains bénéficiant d’une chirurgie à haut risque, son utilisation péri-opératoire devrait se démocratiser et rendre l’utilisation peropératoire des paramètres dynamiques relativement plus hasardeuse. Dans ce contexte, l’alternative pourrait être l’utilisation de mini-remplissages rapides qui ne semblent pas être affectés par les faibles volumes courant, l’arythmie et la ventilation spontanée. Lorsqu’une optimisation peropératoire du remplissage vasculaire est réalisée chez un patient sous ventilation mécanique, une titration “améliorée” du remplissage vasculaire basée sur des mini-remplissages rapides doit être préférée à une hypothétique prédiction au remplissage.
    Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation 07/2014; 33(7-8). DOI:10.1016/j.annfar.2014.07.004 · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Arterial pulse pressure has been widely used as surrogate of stroke volume, for example, in the guidance of fluid therapy. However, recent experimental investigations suggest that arterial pulse pressure is not linearly proportional to stroke volume. However, mechanisms underlying the relation between the two have not been clearly understood. The goal of this study was to elucidate how arterial pulse pressure and stroke volume respond to a perturbation in the left ventricular blood volume based on a systematic mathematical analysis. Both our mathematical analysis and experimental data showed that the relative change in arterial pulse pressure due to a left ventricular blood volume perturbation was consistently smaller than the corresponding relative change in stroke volume, due to the nonlinear left ventricular pressure-volume relation during diastole that reduces the sensitivity of arterial pulse pressure to perturbations in the left ventricular blood volume. Therefore, arterial pulse pressure must be used with care when used as surrogate of stroke volume in guiding fluid therapy.
    BioMed Research International 05/2014; 2014:459269. DOI:10.1155/2014/459269 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The monitoring of the cardiac output (CO) and other hemodynamic parameters, traditionally performed with the thermodilution method via a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), is now increasingly done with the aid of less invasive and much easier to use devices. When used within the context of a hemodynamic optimization protocol, they can positively influence the outcome in both surgical and non-surgical patient populations. While these monitoring tools have simplified the hemodynamic calculations, they are subject to limitations and can lead to erroneous results if not used properly. In this article we will review the commercially available minimally invasive CO monitoring devices, explore their technical characteristics and describe the limitations that should be taken into consideration when clinical decisions are made.
    09/2013; 2(1):19. DOI:10.1186/2047-0525-2-19