Growth Factor-Activated Stem Cell Circuits and Stromal Signals Cooperatively Accelerate Non-Integrated iPSC Reprogramming of Human Myeloid Progenitors

Institute for Cell Engineering, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 08/2012; 7(8):e42838. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042838
Source: PubMed


Nonviral conversion of skin or blood cells into clinically useful human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) occurs in only rare fractions (~0.001%-0.5%) of donor cells transfected with non-integrating reprogramming factors. Pluripotency induction of developmentally immature stem-progenitors is generally more efficient than differentiated somatic cell targets. However, the nature of augmented progenitor reprogramming remains obscure, and its potential has not been fully explored for improving the extremely slow pace of non-integrated reprogramming. Here, we report highly optimized four-factor reprogramming of lineage-committed cord blood (CB) myeloid progenitors with bulk efficiencies of ~50% in purified episome-expressing cells. Lineage-committed CD33(+)CD45(+)CD34(-) myeloid cells and not primitive hematopoietic stem-progenitors were the main targets of a rapid and nearly complete non-integrated reprogramming. The efficient conversion of mature myeloid populations into NANOG(+)TRA-1-81(+) hiPSC was mediated by synergies between hematopoietic growth factor (GF), stromal activation signals, and episomal Yamanaka factor expression. Using a modular bioinformatics approach, we demonstrated that efficient myeloid reprogramming correlated not to increased proliferation or endogenous Core factor expressions, but to poised expression of GF-activated transcriptional circuits that commonly regulate plasticity in both hematopoietic progenitors and embryonic stem cells (ESC). Factor-driven conversion of myeloid progenitors to a high-fidelity pluripotent state was further accelerated by soluble and contact-dependent stromal signals that included an implied and unexpected role for Toll receptor-NFκB signaling. These data provide a paradigm for understanding the augmented reprogramming capacity of somatic progenitors, and reveal that efficient induced pluripotency in other cell types may also require extrinsic activation of a molecular framework that commonly regulates self-renewal and differentiation in both hematopoietic progenitors and ESC.

Download full-text


Available from: Tea Soon Park, Oct 05, 2015
21 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer treatment generally relies on tumor ablative techniques that can lead to major functional or disfiguring defects. These post-therapy impairments require the development of safe regenerative therapy strategies during cancer remission. Many current tissue repair approaches exploit paracrine (immunomodulatory, pro-angiogenic, anti-apoptotic and pro-survival effects) or restoring (functional or structural tissue repair) properties of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC). Yet, a major concern in the application of regenerative therapies during cancer remission remains the possible triggering of cancer recurrence. Tumor relapse implies the persistence of rare subsets of tumor-initiating cancer cells which can escape anti-cancer therapies and lie dormant in specific niches awaiting reactivation via unknown stimuli. Many of the components required for successful regenerative therapy (revascularization, immunosuppression, cellular homing, tissue growth promotion) are also critical for tumor progression and metastasis. While bidirectional crosstalk between tumorigenic cells (especially aggressive cancer cell lines) and MSC (including tumor stroma-resident populations) has been demonstrated in a variety of cancers, the effects of local or systemic MSC delivery for regenerative purposes on persisting cancer cells during remission remain controversial. Both pro- and anti-tumorigenic effects of MSC have been reported in the literature. Our own data using breast cancer clinical isolates have suggested that dormant-like tumor-initiating cells do not respond to MSC signals, unlike actively dividing cancer cells which benefited from the presence of supportive MSC. The secretome of MSC isolated from various tissues may partially diverge, but it includes a core of cytokines (i.e. CCL2, CCL5, IL-6, TGFβ, VEGF), which have been implicated in tumor growth and/or metastasis. This article reviews published models for studying interactions between MSC and cancer cells with a focus on the impact of MSC secretome on cancer cell activity, and discusses the implications for regenerative therapy after cancer.
    Biochimie 06/2013; 95(12). DOI:10.1016/j.biochi.2013.05.010 · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recently, using the chemical genetics approach for cell reprogramming, via the combination of small molecule modulators of chromatin modifying enzymes, specific SMAD signaling pathways, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels, we have been able to generate neuronallike cells predominantly positive to mature neuronal and dopaminergic markers. This study aimed to characterize further the dopaminergic properties of neurally induced (NI) human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and to determine whether addition of sonic hedgehog (SHH)/fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) to NI medium could promote further dopaminergic maturation. Dopaminergic differentiation was evaluated by immunocytochemistry, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results demonstrated that release of dopamine by NI-hMSCs differentiated with SMAD inhibitor supplementation increased significantly increased from picogram to nanogram levels, with a tendency of further increase when supplemented by SHH/FGF8. Direct generation of dopaminergic cells from adult hMSCs by using this reprogramming approach may have significant implications for understanding the mechanism underlying cell plasticity and may open new potentialities for cell replacement therapies.
    08/2013; 162(5). DOI:10.1016/j.trsl.2013.08.002
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The generation of vascular progenitors (VP) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) has great potential for treating vascular disorders such as ischemic retinopathies. However, long-term in vivo engraftment of hiPSC-derived VP into retina has not yet been reported. This goal may be limited by the low differentiation yield, greater senescence, and poor proliferation of hiPSC-derived vascular cells. To evaluate the potential of hiPSC for treating ischemic retinopathies, we generated VP from a repertoire of viral-integrated and non-integrated fibroblast and cord blood (CB)-derived hiPSC lines, and tested their capacity for homing and engrafting into murine retina in an ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) model. VP from human embryonic stem cells (hESC) and hiPSC were generated with an optimized hemato-vascular differentiation system. FACS-purification of human embryoid body (hEB) cells differentially expressing endothelial/pericytic markers identified a CD31(+)CD146(+) VP population with high vascular potency. Episomal CB-iPSC generated these VP with higher efficiencies than fibroblast-iPSC. Moreover, in contrast to fibroblast-iPSC-VP, CB-iPSC-VP maintained expression signatures more comparable to hESC-VP, expressed higher levels of immature vascular markers, demonstrated less culture senescence and sensitivity to DNA damage, and possessed fewer transmitted reprogramming errors. Luciferase transgene-marked VP from hESC, CB-iPSC, and fibroblast-iPSC were injected systemically or directly into the vitreous of retinal I/R-injured adult NOD-SCID mice. Only hESC- and CB-iPSC-derived VP reliably homed and engrafted into injured retinal capillaries, with incorporation into damaged vessels for up to 45 days. VP generated from CB-iPSC possessed augmented capacity to home, integrate into, and repair damaged retinal vasculature.
    Circulation 10/2013; 129(3). DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003000 · 14.43 Impact Factor
Show more