Successful Integration of the Histology Core Laboratory in Translational Research.

Department of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Journal of histotechnology (Impact Factor: 0.29). 04/2012; 35(1):17-21. DOI: 10.1179/2046023612Y.0000000001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a diagnostic setting, the histology laboratory is a key resource for production of quality tissues so the pathologist can make an appropriate diagnosis. In a research setting, the histology laboratory is a valuable resource in providing an excellent quality product for publications and grants for the investigator. Optimal collaboration with research investigators requires that histotechnologists recognize the diverse challenges and opportunities in research. This paper emphasizes the importance of positive interaction with researchers, optimizing professional service for these clients and recognizing key services of histology laboratories in a research setting to maximize success.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Histopathologic scoring is a tool by which semiquantitative data can be obtained from tissues. Initially, a thorough understanding of the experimental design, study objectives, and methods is required for the pathologist to appropriately examine tissues and develop lesion scoring approaches. Many principles go into the development of a scoring system such as tissue examination, lesion identification, scoring definitions, and consistency in interpretation. Masking (aka "blinding") of the pathologist to experimental groups is often necessary to constrain bias, and multiple mechanisms are available. Development of a tissue scoring system requires appreciation of the attributes and limitations of the data (eg, nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio data) to be evaluated. Incidence, ordinal, and rank methods of tissue scoring are demonstrated along with key principles for statistical analyses and reporting. Validation of a scoring system occurs through 2 principal measures: (1) validation of repeatability and (2) validation of tissue pathobiology. Understanding key principles of tissue scoring can help in the development and/or optimization of scoring systems so as to consistently yield meaningful and valid scoring data.
    Veterinary Pathology 04/2013; · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Arginases are a family of enzymes that convert L-arginine to L-ornithine and urea. Alterations in expression of the isoform arginase-I are increasingly recognized in lung diseases such as asthma and cystic fibrosis. To define expression of murine arginase-I in formalin-fixed tissues, including lung, an immunohistochemical protocol was validated in murine liver, a tissue that has distinct zonal arginase-I expression, making it a useful control. In the lung, arginase-I immunostaining was observed in airway surface epithelium and this decreased from large to small airways, with a preferential staining of ciliated epithelium versus Clara cells and alveolar epithelia. In submucosal glands, the ducts and serous acini had moderate immunostaining, which was absent in mucous cells. Focal immunostaining was observed in alveolar macrophages, endothelial cells, pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes, pulmonary artery smooth muscle, airway smooth muscle, and neurons of ganglia of the lung. Arginase-I immunostaining was also detected in other tissues including salivary glands, pancreas, liver, skin, and intestine. Differential immunostaining was observed between sexes in submandibular salivary glands; arginase-I was diffusely expressed in the convoluted granular duct cells of females, but was rarely noted in males. Strain specific differences were not detected. In a mouse with an incidental case of lymphoma, neoplastic lymphocytes lacked arginase-I immunostaining, in contrast to immunostaining detected in non-neoplastic lymphocytes of lymphoid tissues. The use of liver tissue to validate arginase-I immunohistochemistry produced consistent expression patterns in mice,and this approach can be useful to enhance consistency of arginase-I immunohistochemical studies.
    Journal of histotechnology 12/2013; 36(4):128-134. · 0.29 Impact Factor


Available from
May 22, 2014