Article

Theory of Planned Behavior explains gender difference in fruit and vegetable consumption

Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 0001, USA.
Appetite (Impact Factor: 2.69). 08/2012; 59(3):693-697. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A gender difference in fruit and vegetable intake (FVI) is widely documented, but not well understood. Using data from the National Cancer Institute's Food Attitudes and Behavior Survey, we assessed the extent to which gender differences in FVI are attributable to gender differences in constructs from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Females reported more favorable attitudes and greater perceived behavior control regarding FVI than males, and these beliefs mediated the observed gender difference. Males reported greater perceived norms for FVI, but norms did not predict FVI. Gender did not moderate the influence of TPB constructs on FVI. Thus, TPB constructs substantially explained the gender difference. Interventions targeted toward adult males may benefit by promoting favorable attitudes and perceived behavioral control over FVI.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John A Updegraff, Apr 17, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
145 Views
  • Source
    01/2014; 2(4). DOI:10.15640/ijpt.v2n4a7
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PurposeThe purpose of the study was to explore and understand knowledge and attitudes about food, diet, and weight control, focusing on barriers and motivators to reduce risk of developing type 2 diabetes.Methods Six focus groups were conducted in May and June 2010. The groups were stratified by sex. A total of 35 ethnically diverse samples with a high risk for type 2 diabetes participated. The average age was 51 ± 10.6 years, and 57% of the sample represented women.ResultsFour themes emerged from the focus groups: (1) demonstrated knowledge and source of knowledge, including participants' basic understanding of "good" and "bad" food and what constitutes a "healthy diet" and trusted sources of information; (2) perceptions of food and diet, encompassing how participants expressed their perception of and interaction with food and diet; (3) sense of control over dietary intake, reflecting participants' discussion of their perceived ability to control their eating patterns and food choices; and (4) eating behaviors, describing participants' patterns of eating and perceived barriers to eating a healthy diet.Conclusions Study findings demonstrate that eating healthy requires a complex interaction between individual perceptions of food and sense of control over eating patterns and sociopolitical and economic structural factors that restrict healthy eating options while promoting unhealthy ones. Programs for long-term eating behavioral change necessary to reduce type 2 diabetes and obesity need to incorporate strategies that address individual-level factors of perception of food and sense of control over eating patterns, as well as structural level factors such as poverty and food insecurity.
    The Diabetes Educator 02/2014; 40(3). DOI:10.1177/0145721714522717 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Differences between men and women with respect to dietary intakes and eating behaviours have been reported and could be explained by gender differences in motivational variables associated with the regulation of food intake. The main objectives of the present study were to identify gender differences in dietary intakes, eating behaviours and motivational variables and to determine how motivational variables were associated with dietary intakes and eating behaviours in men and women. Sixty-four men and 59 premenopausal women were included in the present study and presented cardiovascular risk factors. The Regulation of Eating Behaviours scale was completed to assess motivational variables. A validated food frequency questionnaire was administered to evaluate dietary intakes and subjects completed the Three-Factor Eating questionnaire to assess eating behaviours. Men had higher energy intake, energy density and percentage of energy from lipids and lower percentage of energy from carbohydrates than women (P ≤ 0.04). Men also had a lower emotional susceptibility to disinhibition than women (P = 0.0001). Women reported a higher score for eating-related self-determined motivation [i.e. eating-related self-determination index (SDI)] than men (P = 0.002). The most notable gender difference in the pattern of associations was that eating-related SDI was negatively associated with energy density (r = -0.30; P = 0.02), only in women. Women had a better dietary profile and higher eating-related SDI than men. However, gender differences in dietary variables might be explained by a potential gender-specific pattern of association of eating-related SDI with dietary intakes and eating behaviours.
    Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 02/2014; 28(1). DOI:10.1111/jhn.12213 · 2.07 Impact Factor
Show more