Long-term Survivorship and Failure Modes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Center, Golden, CO, USA, .
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.77). 08/2012; 471(1). DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2517-y
Source: PubMed


BACKGROUND: In a previously reported series of 51 patients with 62 cemented, fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, we reported a 10-year, 98% survival rate with an average knee score of 92 points. The survivorship and modes of failure past 10 years are incompletely understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: At 15-year followup we sought to determine (1) the overall durability and survivorship of this design; (2) modes of failure; and (3) the progression of arthritis in the nonresurfaced compartments. METHODS: Nineteen knees in 16 patients were available for study with 34 patients lost to death and one lost to followup. At 15 years, we analyzed the Kaplan-Meier survivorship as well as durability with regard to radiographic loosening and knee scores, determined modes of failure, and assessed radiographs for degeneration in the nonresurfaced compartments. RESULTS: Fifteen-year survivorship was 93% and 20-year survivorship was 90%. Four of 62 knees were revised to total knee arthroplasty at a mean of 144 months. One knee was revised for patellofemoral and lateral compartment degeneration, one for lateral compartment degeneration, one for polyethylene disengagement and metallosis, and one for pain of unclear etiology. No patients had aseptic loosening or osteolysis. The mean knee score was 78 at latest followup. Arthritic progression in the nonresurfaced compartments was common although symptomatic in only two patients. CONCLUSIONS: With this cemented, fixed-bearing design, the failure rates were low, there were no cases of failure secondary to wear or loosening, and the survivorship was similar to that reported for total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

17 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purposes of this study were to describe a method for measuring tibiofemoral subluxation in UKA, and to report the mean amount of tibiofemoral subluxation seen both preoperatively and postoperatively in a cohort of patients undergoing UKA. Two hundred thirty-five patients who received a medial UKA, and 39 patients who received a lateral UKA, were reviewed. In the medial UKA cohort, the mechanical alignment was corrected from 7.7°±5.9° preoperatively, to 2.9°±2.5° postoperatively, while the tibiofemoral subluxation was corrected from 4.5mm±3.0mm preoperatively, to 2.3mm±2.7mm postoperatively. In the lateral UKA cohort, the mechanical alignment was corrected from -5.5°±3.8° to -1.6°±3.4°, while the tibiofemoral subluxation was corrected from 4.3mm±2.7mm to 2.8mm±2.5mm. This study presents a novel method for measurement of tibiofemoral subluxation, the mean amount of tibiofemoral subluxation present preoperatively, and the amount of correction that can be expected during both medial and lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty.
    The Journal of arthroplasty 04/2013; 28(9). DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.001 · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The vitality of the aging athlete is largely dependent on continued mobility and pain-free motion. The early onset of osteoarthritis often has devastating consequences for these athletes and if left untreated, mobility declines and eventually prevents sporting activities all together. Recent advances in operative treatment for unicompartmental arthritis of the knee aim to delay the need for total joint arthroplasty by preserving or restoring the form and function of the knee to allow for continued sport participation. This review focuses on the recent literature of several surgical treatment options for unicompartmental disease including cartilage procedures, osteotomy, and unicompartmental arthroplasty.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 06/2013; 6(3). DOI:10.1007/s12178-013-9171-1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cementless fixation is an increasingly popular option in unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). Early cementless UKAs suffered from unreliable fixation and uptake of cementless UKA was limited. However, modern designs of cementless UKA have demonstrated excellent results with improved radiographic appearances when compared with cemented implants. This is supported by early joint registry data, which demonstrate a survival advantage with cementless fixation in one design of UKA. This review explains the rationale for cementless UKA, summarizes the results from published trials, and highlights technical aspects points to be aware of when implanting cementless UKA.
    Orthopedic Clinics of North America 07/2013; 44(3):261-9. DOI:10.1016/j.ocl.2013.03.001 · 1.25 Impact Factor
Show more