Who Participates in Chronic Disease Self-management (CDSM) Programs? Differences Between Participants and Nonparticipants in a Population of Multimorbid Older Adults.

*Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health †Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine ‡Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine §Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, MD.
Medical care (Impact Factor: 3.23). 08/2012; 50(12). DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268abe7
Source: PubMed


BACKGROUND:: Self-care management is recognized as a key component of care for multimorbid older adults; however, the characteristics of those most likely to participate in Chronic Disease Self-Management (CDSM) programs and strategies to maximize participation in such programs are unknown. OBJECTIVES:: To identify individual factors associated with attending CDSM programs in a sample of multimorbid older adults. RESEARCH DESIGN:: Participants in the intervention arm of a matched-pair cluster-randomized controlled trial of the Guided Care model were invited to attend a 6-session CDSM course. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with attendance. SUBJECTS:: All subjects (N=241) were aged 65 years or older, were at high risk for health care utilization, and were not homebound. MEASURES:: Baseline information on demographics, health status, health activities, and quality of care was available for CDSM participants and nonparticipants. Participation was defined as attendance at 5 or more CDSM sessions. RESULTS:: A total of 22.8% of multimorbid older adults who were invited to CDSM courses participated in 5 or more sessions. Having better physical health (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]=2.3 [1.1-4.8]) and rating one's physician poorly on support for patient activation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]=2.8 [1.3-6.0]) were independently associated with attendance. CONCLUSIONS:: Multimorbid older adults who are in better physical health and who are dissatisfied with their physicians' support for patient activation are more likely to participate in CDSM courses.

Download full-text


Available from: Melissa Dattalo, Oct 23, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract To make a difference to patients who increasingly suffer multiple chronic conditions, in a healthcare system that is capable of providing excellent care but is often ineffective and at cross-purposes in its application, means being prepared to take a different approach not only to the delivery of patient care, but to the education of physicians and other healthcare professionals. The model we must now practice and teach is one that emphasizes collaboration and prevention, quality and efficiency. Changes in practice recommended by the 2001 US Institute of Medicine report are being implemented system-wide, following the enactment of the US Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This paper discusses the evolving needs of patients with chronic psychiatric illness, and the psychiatrist's role in a rapidly changing healthcare landscape as a care provider, an interdisciplinary role model, and educator. In an aging population in which multi-morbidity is the norm, episodic, crisis-driven care is prohibitively expensive and does not serve patients well. Yet we still teach that model of care. The medications we prescribe for psychiatric illness, particularly antipsychotics, can cause and/or aggravate some of the commonest chronic medical illnesses; psychiatric educators must address the management of these complications. The management of chronic psychiatric illness in multi-morbid patients demands that we practice and teach a 'whole patient' approach to care, preferably delivered as part of a patient-centred team. The Affordable Care Act has mandated and created opportunities for new models designed to facilitate this, and a paradigm shift is needed in medical education. Clinicians must become adept at identifying underlying and contributing factors and collaborating with the patient, other providers, and the patient's family and significant others. Psychiatric formulation and patient care rely on these principles; we must now teach their application to other specialties, disciplines and professions.
    International Review of Psychiatry 06/2013; 25(3):319-28. DOI:10.3109/09540261.2013.782854 · 1.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with multimorbidity are increasingly common in general practice. Multimorbidity is a challenge for both patients and practitioners because of the complexity of care and its impact on patients' lives. Single-disease-based guidelines are of limited use to providers managing patients with multimorbidity. The article aims to discuss how multimorbidity can be best managed in general practice. It does this within the framework of a patient-centred approach that recognises the importance of finding common ground with patients in setting priorities and assessing the impact of care. Providing effective care for multimorbidity requires shared decision-making about goals with patients and more effective communication and coordination between providers. For this group of patients, our current single-disease-based models of care need to be replaced with more integrated ones in which the impact of all the patient's conditions on their quality of life are considered.
    Australian family physician 12/2013; 42(12):850-4. · 0.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The high prevalence of chronic diseases in western countries accompanies a simultaneous growth of multimorbidities. The effectiveness of the interventions on such patients shows limited evidence. Among these interventions, therapeutic patient education (TPE) has acquired a growing importance, but most of the TPE programs are still tailored on one disease and currently, no operational model for people with multimorbidity exists. The purpose of this study is to give an updated picture of TPE for patients with multimorbidity, analysing its characteristics and development as described by the international literature from 2004 to 2013. Methods: We have searched for studies on patient education for multimorbid patients from four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus, using the following keywords: multipatholog∗, pluripatholog∗, multiple chronic conditions, multimorbid∗, polymorbid∗, patient education, self-care, self-management, intervention, program∗. Results: We selected 9 articles among 235 related specifically to TPE programs addressed to patients with two or more chronic conditions. We analyzed the characteristics of these studies: population, type of study, content, educational strategy of TPE programs, settings, health personal involved, bio-clinical, psychosocial and educational outcomes. The TPE programs do not seem to differ radically from those centered on an unique disease, except for the fact that they put the accent on the "transversal competencies", like the understanding of the different diseases, drug management, nutrition and physical activity. This review confirms that, even if such TPE programs can be designed and bring some positive results for the patients, currently no operational model of patient education for people with multimorbidity exists.
    Education thérapeutique du patient - Therapeutic patient education 12/2014; 6(2-2):20105. DOI:10.1051/tpe/2014015
Show more