Single mutation to a sex pheromone receptor provides adaptive specificity between closely related moth species.

Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 08/2012; 109(35):14081-6. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204661109
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sex pheromone communication, acting as a prezygotic barrier to mating, is believed to have contributed to the speciation of moths and butterflies in the order Lepidoptera. Five decades after the discovery of the first moth sex pheromone, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie the evolution of pheromone communication between closely related species. Although Asian and European corn borers (ACB and ECB) can be interbred in the laboratory, they are behaviorally isolated from mating naturally by their responses to subtly different sex pheromone isomers, (E)-12- and (Z)-12-tetradecenyl acetate and (E)-11- and (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (ACB: E12, Z12; ECB; E11, Z11). Male moth olfactory systems respond specifically to the pheromone blend produced by their conspecific females. In vitro, ECB(Z) odorant receptor 3 (OR3), a sex pheromone receptor expressed in male antennae, responds strongly to E11 but also generally to the Z11, E12, and Z12 pheromones. In contrast, we show that ACB OR3, a gene that has been subjected to positive selection (ω = 2.9), responds preferentially to the ACB E12 and Z12 pheromones. In Ostrinia species the amino acid residue corresponding to position 148 in transmembrane domain 3 of OR3 is alanine (A), except for ACB OR3 that has a threonine (T) in this position. Mutation of this residue from A to T alters the pheromone recognition pattern by selectively reducing the E11 response ∼14-fold. These results suggest that discrete mutations that narrow the specificity of more broadly responsive sex pheromone receptors may provide a mechanism that contributes to speciation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Communication is central to accomplishing the tasks of life, coordinating activities like mating, feeding, fighting, and flocking. To be successful, these tasks are often restricted to members of an individual’s own evolutionary lineage, or conspecifics. The ability to recognize conspecifics is often termed “species recognition.” Here, I summarize the difficulties associated with the concept of species recognition and describe a perceptual-conceptual framework for considering the processes by which organisms recognize members of a particular group. Recently published studies that focus on species recognition are highlighted and discussed in light of that framework, and I conclude by articulating open and fundamental questions that arise from challenging earlier notions of species recognition.
    Evolutionary Ecology 03/2015; 29(2):205-215. DOI:10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The molecular basis of odorant detection and its corollary, the task of the odorant receptor, are fundamental to understanding olfactory coding and sensory ecology. Based on their molecular receptive range, olfactory receptors have been classified as pheromone and non-pheromone receptors, which are respectively activated by a single pheromone component (" specialist ") or by multiple odorant ligands (" generalist "). This functional distinction is unique among ligand-gated ion channels and has shaped how we model olfactory coding both at the peripheral and central levels. Here, we revisit the long-standing combinatorial theory of olfaction and argue, based on physiological, pharmacological, evolutionary, and experimental grounds that the task of the odorant receptor is not different from that of neurotransmitter receptors localized in neuronal synapses.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insects transmit numerous devastating diseases, including malaria, dengue fever, and sleeping sickness. Olfactory cues guide insects to their hosts, and are thus responsible for disease transmission. Understanding the molecular basis of insect olfaction could facilitate the development of interventions. The first step is to heterologously overexpress and purify insect olfactory receptors (ORs). This is challenging, as ORs are membrane proteins. Here, we show that insect ORs and their co-receptor can be expressed in an E. coli cell-free system. After immunoaffinity chromatography, the ORs are ~95% pure, and up to 1 mg/10 ml reaction is obtained. Circular dichroism together with microscale thermophoresis indicate that each receptor is properly folded, and can bind its respective ligand. This is the first time insect ORs have been expressed in an E. coli system. The methods described here could facilitate future structure-function studies, which may aid in developments to alleviate the suffering of millions caused by insect-transmitted diseases.
    Scientific Reports 01/2015; 5:7867. DOI:10.1038/srep07867 · 5.08 Impact Factor


Available from
May 22, 2014