Article

Prediction of major postoperative complications and survival for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients.

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand.
Asian Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 0.54). 07/2012; 35(3):104-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.04.029
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Predicting the major complications after esophagectomy is important and may help in preselecting patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery, especially in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients who have poor prognosis.
To identify the factors associated with the development of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage complications, and the survival characteristics in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.
A consecutive series of 232 locally advanced esophageal cancer patients (183 men and 49 women, median age 63 years) who underwent esophagectomy at Prince of Songkla University Hospital between 1998 and 2007 was analyzed.
There were nine (3.8%) 30-day mortalities. Pneumonia occurred in 53 patients (22.8%) and anastomotic leakage in 37 patients (15.9%). Multivariate analyses showed that low body mass index was related to leakage (p = 0.015), while soft-diet dysphagia (p = 0.009), forced expiratory volume in 1 second <75% (p = 0.0005), type of surgery (McKeown technique) (p = 0.019), and long operative time (p = 0.006) were related to pneumonia. The median survival rate was 13.0 months. Stage 2b patients had longer survival than stages 3 and 4a patients (p = 0.0001).
Patient body mass index, dysphagia, spirometry, type of surgical technique, and operative time can help predict the likelihood of pulmonary or leak complications after esophagectomy. TNM (Tumor, Node, Metastasis) staging can help predict the overall survival after resection in locally advanced cases.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered a gold standard in the initial staging of esophageal cancer. There is an ongoing debate whether EUS is useful for tumor staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Ninety-five patients with esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. In 45 patients, EUS was performed prior to and after NAC, while 50 patients had no induction therapy. Histological correlation through surgery was available. uT/uN classifications were compared to pT/pN stages. Statistical analysis included calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates. Agreement between endosonography and T staging was assessed with Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: For those patients with prior NAC, overall accuracy of yuT and yuN classification was 29 and 62%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates for local tumor extension after NAC were as follows (%): T1: -/97/84, T2: 13/76/53, T3:86/29/46, T4:20/100/91, T1/2: 27/83/56, T3/4: 89/31/56. Cohen's kappa indicated poor agreement (kappa = 0.129) between yuT classification and ypT stage. Relative to positive lymph node detection, sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 6%, respectively (kappa = 0.06). T stage was overstaged in 23 (51%) and understaged in seven (16%) patients. CONCLUSION: EUS is an unreliable tool for staging esophageal cancer after NAC. Overstaging of the T stage is common after NAC.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 04/2013; · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is still frequent. Tools for prediction of postoperative complications have been sought, with the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system being one of the candidates. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of the E-PASS system for risk assessment of esophagectomy. Methods The clinical courses of 308 patients who underwent elective subtotal esophagectomy with lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer were analyzed. The incidence and severity of complication and influence of preoperative therapy were investigated using the E-PASS system. Results The incidence of any complication was as high as 42.2 %. The frequency of severe and critical complications was 13.0 and 6.8 %, respectively. The E-PASS system could estimate the incidence and severity of complications. Patients with a comprehensive risk score (CRS) >0.9 had a significantly higher probability of incidence of severe or critical complications. The incidence of complication and the CRS increased linearly according to preoperative treatment in the following order: no preoperative treatment < neoadjuvant chemotherapy < neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy < definitive chemoradiotherapy. These were significantly higher after salvage esophagectomy. Conclusion The E-PASS scoring system was useful for risk assessment after esophagectomy. Patients with a CRS >0.9 and patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy should be treated carefully after surgery. Among two scoring systems of which the CRS consisted, the surgical stress score strongly correlated with postoperative complications after esophagectomy, but the preoperative risk score did not.
    Esophagus 01/2013; 10(2). · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As esophagectomy is associated with a considerable complication rate, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative complications and neoadjuvant treatment on long-term outcome of adenocarcinoma (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients.
    World journal of surgery. 05/2014;

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from