Managing neurobehavioral capability when social expediency trumps biological imperatives

Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Progress in brain research (Impact Factor: 2.83). 08/2012; 199:377-98. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59427-3.00021-6
Source: PubMed


Sleep, which is evolutionarily conserved across species, is a biological imperative that cannot be ignored or replaced. However, the percentage of habitually sleep-restricted adults has increased in recent decades. Extended work hours and commutes, shift work schedules, and television viewing are particularly potent social factors that influence sleep duration. Chronic partial sleep restriction, a product of these social expediencies, leads to the accumulation of sleep debt over time and consequently increases sleep propensity, decreases alertness, and impairs critical aspects of cognitive functioning. Significant interindividual variability in the neurobehavioral responses to sleep restriction exists-this variability is stable and phenotypic-suggesting a genetic basis. Identifying vulnerability to sleep loss is essential as many adults cannot accurately judge their level of impairment in response to sleep restriction. Indeed, the consequences of impaired performance and the lack of insight due to sleep loss can be catastrophic. In order to cope with the effects of social expediencies on biological imperatives, identification of biological (including genetic) and behavioral markers of sleep loss vulnerability as well as development of technological approaches for fatigue management are critical.

Download full-text


Available from: Namni Goel, Aug 14, 2014
41 Reads
  • Source
    • "Sleep debt can accumulate over the work week or shift cycle and without sufficient time to recover, individuals remain vulnerable to sleep loss (Banks et al. 2010; Sallinen and Kecklund 2010). Accumulated sleep loss is often used to explain the relationship between shift work and impaired cognitive performance, safety implications and an increased risk of lifestyle-related illness (Härmä 2006; Spaeth, Goel, and Dinges 2012). Next to the impact of the work schedule, inter-individual variability in sleep duration and quality amongst shift workers is related to differences in the individual phase of entrainment (chronotype) (Roenneberg, Wirz-Justice, and Merrow 2003; Kantermann et al. 2010; Roenneberg et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined associations of chronotype and age with shift-specific assessments of main sleep duration, sleep quality and need for recovery in a cross-sectional study among N = 261 industrial shift workers (96.6% male). Logistic regression analyses were used, adjusted for gender, lifestyle, health, nap behaviour, season of assessment and shift schedule. Shift workers with latest versus earliest chronotype reported a shorter sleep duration (OR 11.68, 95% CI 3.31-41.17) and more awakenings complaints (OR 4.84, 95% CI 4.45-11.92) during morning shift periods. No associations were found between chronotype, sleep and need for recovery during evening and night shift periods. For age, no associations were found with any of the shift-specific outcome measures. The results stress the importance of including the concept of chronotype in shift work research and scheduling beyond the concept of age. Longitudinal research using shift-specific assessments of sleep and need for recovery are needed to confirm these results. Practitioner Summary: Chronotype seems to better explain individual differences in sleep than age. In view of ageing societies, it might therefore be worthwhile to further examine the application of chronotype for individualised shift work schedules to facilitate healthy and sustainable employment.
    Ergonomics 08/2015; DOI:10.1080/00140139.2015.1058426 · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People often sleep deprive themselves voluntarily for social and lifestyle reasons. Animals also appear to stay awake longer as a result of their natural curiosity to explore novel environments and interact socially with conspecifics. Although multiple arousal systems in the brain are known to act jointly to promote and maintain wakefulness, it remains unclear whether these systems are similarly engaged during voluntary vs. forced wakefulness. Using c-Fos immunohistochemistry, we compared neuronal responses in rats deprived of sleep for 2h by gentle sensory stimulation, exploration under social isolation, or exploration with social interaction, and rats under undisturbed control conditions. In many arousal, limbic, and autonomic nuclei examined (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex and locus coeruleus), the two sleep deprivation procedures involving exploration were similarly effective, and both were more effective than sleep deprivation with sensory stimulation, in increasing the number of c-Fos immunoreactive neurons. However, some nuclei (e.g., paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus and select amygdala nuclei) were more responsive to exploration with social interaction, while others (e.g., histaminergic tuberomammillary nucleus) responded more strongly to exploration in social isolation. In the rostral basal forebrain, cholinergic and GABAergic neurons responded preferentially to exploration with social interaction, whereas resident neurons in general responded most strongly to exploration without social interaction. These results indicate that voluntary exploration with/without social interaction is more effective than forced sleep deprivation with gentle sensory stimulation for inducing c-Fos in arousal and limbic/autonomic brain regions, and suggest that these nuclei participate in different aspects of arousal during sustained voluntary wakefulness.
    Behavioural brain research 08/2013; 256. DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.029 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 04/2014; 34(3). DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000000134 · 3.24 Impact Factor
Show more