Initial resuscitation guided by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations and early echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamics in intensive care unit septic patients: A pilot study

Center of Clinical Investigation (JBA, PV), Inserm 0801, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 08/2012; 40(10):2821-7. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825bc565
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT : To compare therapeutic interventions during initial resuscitation derived from echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamics and from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in intensive care unit septic patients.
: Prospective, descriptive study in two intensive care units of teaching hospitals.
: The number of ventilated patients with septic shock who were studied was 46. Transesophageal echocardiography was first performed (T1 < 3 hrs after intensive care unit admission) to adapt therapy according to the following predefined hemodynamic profiles: fluid loading (index of collapsibility of the superior vena cava ≥36%), inotropic support (left ventricular fractional area change <45% without relevant index of collapsibility of the superior vena cava), or increased vasopressor support (right ventricular systolic dysfunction, unremarkable transesophageal echocardiography study consistent with sustained vasoplegia). Agreement for treatment decision between transesophageal echocardiography and Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines was evaluated. A second transesophageal echocardiography assessment (T2) was performed to validate therapeutic interventions.
: Although transesophageal echocardiography and Surviving Sepsis Campaign approaches were concordant to manage fluid loading in 32 of 46 patients (70%), echocardiography led to the absence of blood volume expansion in the remaining 14 patients who all had a central venous pressure <12mm Hg. Accordingly, the agreement was weak between transesophageal echocardiography and Surviving Sepsis Campaign for the decision of fluid loading (κ: 0.37 [0.16;0.59]). With a cut-off value <8 mm Hg for central venous pressure, κ was 0.33 [-0.03;0.69]. Inotropes were prescribed based on transesophageal echocardiography assessment in 14 patients but would have been decided in only four patients according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. As a result, the agreement between the two approaches for the decision of inotropic support was weak (κ: 0.23 [-0.04;0.50]). No right ventricular dysfunction was observed. No patient had anemia and only three patients with transesophageal echocardiography documented left ventricular systolic dysfunction had a central venous oxygen saturation <70%.
: A weak agreement was found in the prescription of fluid loading and inotropic support derived from early transesophageal echocardiography assessment of hemodynamics and Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in patients presenting with septic shock.


Available from: Cyril Charron, Apr 20, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock.
    Intensive Care Medicine 11/2014; DOI:10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z · 5.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction A growing body of evidence points out that a large amount of patients with sepsis are admitted and treated in medical ward (MW). With most of the sepsis studies conducted in intensive care unit (ICU), these patients, older and with more comorbidities have received poor attention. Provided the differences between the two groups of patients, results of diagnostic and therapeutic trials from ICU should not be routinely transferred to MW, where sepsis seems to be at least as common as in ICU. Methods We analyzed clinical trials on novel tools for an early diagnosis of sepsis published in the last two year adopting strict research criteria. Moreover we conducted a target review of the literature on non-invasive monitoring of severe sepsis and septic shock. Results and Conclusions The combination of innovative and non-invasive tools for sepsis rule in/out, as quick alternatives to blood cultures (gold standard) with bedside integrated ultrasonography could impact triage, diagnosis and prognosis of septic patients managed in MW, preventing ICU admissions, poor outcomes and costly complications, especially in elderly that are usually highly vulnerable to invasive procedures.
    Infection 08/2014; DOI:10.1007/s15010-014-0673-6 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) the presence of multiple high tech devices is common in order to perform multiple medical and non-medical procedures. The authors intend to perform a critical appraisal on the basic and practical/clinical approach to monitoring devices, analyzing the evidence support regarding clinical effects, end-points, and patient safety. All data that provides a diagnosis or a characterization of the patient's status will be considered diagnostic information whereas, variables that could be achieved by medical interventions will be considered therapeutic end-points. In any healthcare setting a careful approach to the patient is needed, namely in ICM one must consider the patient's clinical condition and choose adequate diagnostic tools and devices. Not all variables and devices currently on the market are suitable for each patient, nor proved useful in the setting under study. Also, all patients are different and must be approached differently according to established clinical end-points, translating into more holistic caregiving. ICM requires a personalized approach towards the patient, consequently, submitting diagnostic tools and monitoring devices to greater scrutiny in order to obtain greater patient benefit.
    05/2014; 4(7). DOI:10.5430/jnep.v4n7p129