Initial resuscitation guided by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations and early echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamics in intensive care unit septic patients: A pilot study

Center of Clinical Investigation (JBA, PV), Inserm 0801, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 08/2012; 40(10):2821-7. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825bc565
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT : To compare therapeutic interventions during initial resuscitation derived from echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamics and from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in intensive care unit septic patients.
: Prospective, descriptive study in two intensive care units of teaching hospitals.
: The number of ventilated patients with septic shock who were studied was 46. Transesophageal echocardiography was first performed (T1 < 3 hrs after intensive care unit admission) to adapt therapy according to the following predefined hemodynamic profiles: fluid loading (index of collapsibility of the superior vena cava ≥36%), inotropic support (left ventricular fractional area change <45% without relevant index of collapsibility of the superior vena cava), or increased vasopressor support (right ventricular systolic dysfunction, unremarkable transesophageal echocardiography study consistent with sustained vasoplegia). Agreement for treatment decision between transesophageal echocardiography and Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines was evaluated. A second transesophageal echocardiography assessment (T2) was performed to validate therapeutic interventions.
: Although transesophageal echocardiography and Surviving Sepsis Campaign approaches were concordant to manage fluid loading in 32 of 46 patients (70%), echocardiography led to the absence of blood volume expansion in the remaining 14 patients who all had a central venous pressure <12mm Hg. Accordingly, the agreement was weak between transesophageal echocardiography and Surviving Sepsis Campaign for the decision of fluid loading (κ: 0.37 [0.16;0.59]). With a cut-off value <8 mm Hg for central venous pressure, κ was 0.33 [-0.03;0.69]. Inotropes were prescribed based on transesophageal echocardiography assessment in 14 patients but would have been decided in only four patients according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. As a result, the agreement between the two approaches for the decision of inotropic support was weak (κ: 0.23 [-0.04;0.50]). No right ventricular dysfunction was observed. No patient had anemia and only three patients with transesophageal echocardiography documented left ventricular systolic dysfunction had a central venous oxygen saturation <70%.
: A weak agreement was found in the prescription of fluid loading and inotropic support derived from early transesophageal echocardiography assessment of hemodynamics and Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in patients presenting with septic shock.

Download full-text


Available from: Cyril Charron, Jul 01, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Echocardiography is a versatile, accurate and noninvasive tool suited to examination of shocked patients. Since the 1980s, intensive care practitioners have used ultrasound widely for hemodynamic evaluation and for cardiac anatomy visualization. This article will describe transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, their scope, and the classic windows needed to interpret the examination properly. We will also report the main indications of echocardiography and the corresponding parameters. Finally, we will indicate educational programs and define minimum training that enable self-sufficiency.
    International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 07/2012; 26(5):355-60. DOI:10.1007/s10877-012-9385-6 · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • Critical care medicine 10/2012; 40(10):2911-2. DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826324c3 · 6.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To reiterate the necessity of integrating echocardiography in the management of shocked patients and to propose a step-by-step functional evaluation of hemodynamics proven to optimize hemodynamic monitoring and to adapt the treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Echocardiography has become the cornerstone to hemodynamic monitoring. By providing real-time images, echocardiography has the advantage over 'blind' technologies of an excellent diagnostic performance and of quick provision of information about the pathophysiology of circulatory failure. Critical care echocardiography (CCE) has been defined as echocardiography performed and interpreted by intensivists themselves, 7/7 and 24/24, at the bedside. Basic CCE is mainly a diagnostic approach, allowing quick and focused examination of cardiac function. Advanced CCE is the core of functional hemodynamic monitoring. It is based not only on transthoracic echocardiography but also strongly on transesophageal echocardiography, a very useful approach in ventilated patients. However, this monitoring is discontinuous. A single-use 72-h indwelling transesophageal probe was recently tested, allowing functional hemodynamic monitoring more continuously. SUMMARY: Echocardiography has become a hemodynamic monitoring technique used worldwide. It allows to make a quick and simple diagnosis of typical hemodynamic situations, by means of basic CCE, and also to achieve real functional hemodynamic monitoring, through advanced CCE.
    Current opinion in critical care 03/2013; DOI:10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283602344 · 3.18 Impact Factor