Improvised explosive device related pelvi-perineal trauma: Anatomic injuries and surgical management

University of Birmingham Hospital Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 08/2012; 73(2 Suppl 1):S24-31. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182625f82
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pelviperineal injuries, primarily due to blast mechanisms, are becoming the signature injury pattern on operations in Afghanistan. This study set out to define these injuries and to refine our team-based surgical resuscitation strategies to provide a resuscitation-debridement-diversion didactic on our Military Operational Surgical Training predeployment course to optimize our field care of these injuries.
A retrospective study of the UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registry was performed looking at consecutive data from January 2003 to December 2010, identifying patients with perineal injuries. Data abstracted included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), management, and outcomes.
Of 2204 UK military trauma patients, 118 (5.4%) had a recorded perineal injury and 56 (47%) died . Pelvic fractures were identified in 63 (53%) of 118 patients of which only 17 (27%) of 63 survived. Mortality rates were significantly different between the combined perineal and pelvic fracture group compared with the pelvic fractures or perineal injuries alone (107 [41%] of 261 and 11 [18%] of 56, respectively, p < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) ISS for all patients was 38 (29-57). The ISS for those with pelvic fractures were significantly higher than those with perineal injuries alone, 50 (38-71) versus 30 (15-35) (p < 0.001).
Improvised explosive device-related perineal injuries with pelvic fractures had the highest rate of mortality compared with perineal injuries alone. Early aggressive resuscitation (activation of the massive hemorrhage protocol) is essential to survival in this cohort. Our recommendations are uncompromising initial debridement, immediate fecal diversion, and early enteral feeding.

Download full-text


Available from: Somayyeh Mossadegh, Mar 13, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the potential for morbidity and permanent lifestyle alteration, few reports exist examining traumatic injury to the anal canal, particularly among modern-day combatants.
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 08/2014; 57(8):1012-1018. DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000141 · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The signature injury of the Afghanistan campaign has, amongst other things, included an increased incidence of destructive anorectal injury. There is no significant body of evidence about this type of injury on which to base management strategies. This review examines the historical military data, later civilian reports, many of which have challenged the military dogmas of Vietnam, and the spartan contemporaneous military data which does not particularly address pelviperineal blast injury. There is no evidence to support a move away from the doctrine of the four D's (diversion, distal washout, drainage and direct repair), but sound surgical judgement remains the mainstay of managing these challenging and highly morbid injuries.
    Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 03/2013; 159 Suppl 1:i26-31. DOI:10.1136/jramc-2013-000027 · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improvised explosive device (IED) yields in Afghanistan have increased resulting in more proximal injuries. The injury severity score (ISS) is an anatomic aggregate score of the three most severely injured anatomical areas but does not accurately predict severity in IED related pelvi-perineal trauma patients. A scoring system based on abbreviated injury score (AIS) was developed to reflect the severity of these injuries in order to better understand risk factors, develop a tool for future audit and improve performance. Using standard AIS descriptors, injury scales were constructed for the pelvis (1, minor to 6, maximal). The perineum was divided into anterior and posterior zones as relevant to injury patterns and blast direction with each soft tissue structure being allocated a score from its own severity scale. A cumulative score, from 1 to 36 for soft tissue, or a maximum of 42 if a pelvic fracture was involved, was created for all structures injured in the anterior and posterior zones. Using this new scoring system, 77% of patients survived with a pelvi-perineal trauma score (PPTS) below 5. There was a significant increase in mortality, number of pelvic fractures and amputations with increase in score when comparing the first group (score 1-5) to the second group (score 6-10). For scores between 6 and 16 survival was 42% and 22% for scores between 17 and 21. In our cohort of 62 survivors, 1 patient with an IED related pelvi-perineal injury had a 'theoretically un-survivable' maximal ISS of 75 and survived, whereas there were no survivors with a PPTS greater than 22 but this group had no-one with an ISS of 75 suggesting ISS is not an accurate reflection of the true severity of pelvi-perineal blast injury. This scoring system is the initial part of a more complex logistic regression model that will contribute towards a unique trauma scoring system to aid surgical teams in predicting fluid requirements and operative timelines. In austere environments, it may also help to prevent futile resuscitations. Better correlation between measurement of severity and outcome would aid performance improvement monitoring. In the longer term it will also allow benchmarking of current survival rates and comparisons in the future.
    Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 03/2013; 159 Suppl 1:i40-4. DOI:10.1136/jramc-2013-000020 · 0.81 Impact Factor