A review of analytical strategies for the detection of endogenous' steroid abuse in food production

HFL Sport Science (an LGC company), Fordham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Drug Testing and Analysis (Impact Factor: 2.51). 08/2012; 4 Suppl 1(S1):40-9. DOI: 10.1002/dta.1354
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Detection of the abuse of synthetic steroids in food production is nowadays relatively straightforward using modern techniques such as gas or liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS or LC-MS/MS, respectively). However, proving the abuse of ‘endogenous’ (or naturally occurring) steroids is more difficult. Despite these difficulties, significant progress in this area has recently been made and a number of methods are now available.
The aim of the current review was to systematically review the available analytical approaches, which include threshold concentrations, qualitative ‘marker’ metabolites, intact steroid esters, gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS), longitudinal testing and ‘omics’ biomarker profiling. The advantages/disadvantages of these methods are considered in detail, but the choice of which to adopt is dictated by a number of practical, political, and economic factors, which vary in different parts of the world. These include the steroid/species combination requiring analysis, the matrix tested, whether samples are collected from live or slaughtered animals, available analytical instrumentation, sample throughput/cost, and the relevant legal/regulatory frameworks. Furthermore, these approaches could be combined in a range of different parallel and/or sequential screening/confirmatory testing streams, with the final choice being determined by the aforementioned considerations.
Despite these advances, more work is required to refine the different techniques and to respond to the ever increasing list of compounds classified as ‘endogenous’. At this advanced stage, however, it is now more important than ever for scientists and regulators from across the world to communicate and collaborate in order to harmonize and streamline research efforts. © 2012 HFL Sport Science (LGC Ltd) and © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.

Download full-text


Available from: Hubert De Brabander, Aug 15, 2015
61 Reads
  • Source
    • "Therefore, we focused on these substances in this study. Up to now, many articles have reported methods to detect minoxidil or steroids in drug formulations [7] [8], environmental samples [8], food products [9], and biological samples [10] [11] [12]. However, few procedures for the detection of minoxidil or steroids in cosmetic products have been reported to date [3,13–16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we developed and validated a simple, sensitive, and selective high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS) method to identify and measure the following prohibited substances that may be found in cosmetic products: minoxidil, hydrocortisone, spironolactone, estrone, canrenone, triamcinolone acetonide and progesterone. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters Symmetry C18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 3.5 μm particle size) with a gradient elution system composed of 0.2% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution and methanol containing 0.2% (v/v) formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The substances were detected using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the multiple reaction monitoring mode with an electrospray ionization source. All of the calibration curves showed good linearity (r > 0.999) within the tested concentration ranges. The limit of detection was <25 pg. The relative standard deviations for intraday precision for each of the prohibited substances were <3.5% at two concentration levels (2 μg/g, 10 μg/g). The relative recovery rate for each of the prohibited substances ranged from 91.8% to 111% at three concentration levels (0.1 μg/g, 2 μg/g, 10 μg/g), including the limit of quantification. In conclusion, we have developed and validated a method that can identify seven prohibited substances in cosmetic products.
    Chinese Chemical Letters 06/2013; 24(6):509–511. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2013.03.037 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Mass Spectrometry Reviews 05/2013; 32(3):244-5. DOI:10.1002/mas.21380 · 7.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of dietary supplements is widespread in the general population, in athletes and recreational exercisers, and in military personnel. A wide array of supplements is available, but protein-containing products are consistently among the most popular, especially among those who engage in resistance training. There are significant risks associated with the use of unregulated dietary supplements. Risks include the absence of active ingredients, the presence of harmful substances (including microbiological agents and foreign objects), the presence of toxic agents, and the presence of potentially dangerous prescription-only pharmaceuticals. There is ample evidence of athletes who have failed doping tests because of the use of dietary supplements. There is also growing evidence of risks to health and of serious adverse events, including a small number of fatalities, as a result of supplement use. The risk associated with the use of protein powders produced by major manufacturers is probably low, and the risk can be further reduced by using only products that have been tested under one of the recognized supplement quality assurance programs that operate in various countries. Nevertheless, a small risk remains, and athletes, soldiers, and other consumers should conduct a cost-benefit analysis before using any dietary supplements.
    Journal of Nutrition 09/2013; 143(11). DOI:10.3945/jn.113.176651 · 3.88 Impact Factor
Show more