Associated morbidities to congenital diaphragmatic hernia and a relationship to human milk
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, USA.Advances in Neonatal Care (Impact Factor: 1.12). 08/2012; 12(4):209-16. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e31825eb07b
The majority of what is known in the recent literature regarding human milk studies in the neonatal intensive care setting is specific to term and/or preterm infants (including very-low-birth-weight preterm infants). However, there is a lack of human milk and breastfeeding literature concerning infants with congenital anomalies, specifically infants diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). By applying human milk research conducted among other populations of infants, this article highlights how human milk may have a significant impact on infants with CDH. Recent human milk studies are reviewed and then applied to the CDH population in regard to respiratory and gastrointestinal morbidities, as well as infection and length of stay. In addition, clinical implications of these relationships are discussed and suggestions for future research are presented.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Despite recommendations from the World Health Organization, the United Nations Children's Fund, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding, and others, only a small percentage of infants in the United States receive exclusive human milk for the first 6 months of life. In the United States, decisions related to infant feeding are determined by surrogate or proxy in place of the neonatal voice, using the "best interest principle" as the guiding ethical focus. Given the established research on the benefits of an exclusive human milk diet compared with artificial nutrition (infant formula), infant feeding decisions made for the critically ill neonate should rest entirely in the infant's best interest, not solely in parental authority. If the mother's own milk is not available or its use is contraindicated, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends donor human milk. However, the preverbal voice of the neonate makes it difficult to isolate the best interest of the infant separated from the family unit. Using a case exemplar, it is proposed that the means in which infant feeding decisions are made for the critically ill infant should rest entirely in the infant's best interest, not parental authority, during the course of care in the hospital setting. The best interest principle, surrogate decision making, parental authority, and proxy consent are reviewed. Furthermore, a case for the best interest principle to further illustrate the importance of the infant's voice in relationship to enteral feeding decisions is provided. Finally, implications for clinical practice are offered.Advances in Neonatal Care 08/2014; 14(4):269-73. DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000000109 · 1.12 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.