Article

Response times for emergency cesarean delivery: use of simulation drills to assess and improve obstetric team performance.

Division of Obstetric Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA, USA.
Journal of perinatology: official journal of the California Perinatal Association (Impact Factor: 2.35). 08/2012; DOI: 10.1038/jp.2012.98
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective:We documented time to key milestones and determined reasons for transport-related delays during simulated emergency cesarean.Study Design:Prospective, observational investigation of delivery of care processes by multidisciplinary teams of obstetric providers on the labor and delivery unit at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA, USA, during 14 simulated uterine rupture scenarios. The primary outcome measure was the total time from recognition of the emergency (time zero) to that of surgical incision.Result:The median (interquartile range) from time zero until incision was 9 min 27 s (8:55 to 10:27 min:s).Conclusion:In this series of emergency cesarean drills, our teams required approximately nine and a half minutes to move from the labor room to the nearby operating room (OR) and make the surgical incision. Multiple barriers to efficient transport were identified. This study demonstrates the utility of simulation to identify and correct institution-specific barriers that delay transport to the OR and initiation of emergency cesarean delivery.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 2 August 2012; doi:10.1038/jp.2012.98.

0 Followers
 · 
83 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Formal evaluation of healthcare professionals has been accomplished primarily through assessment of the ability to recall content knowledge despite the fact that cognitive, technical and behavioral skills are all important aspects of human performance in this domain. In addition human performance is also influenced by elements that are extrinsic to the human being including the systems and subsystems with which they must interact. Rigorous assessment of human and system performance in the actual healthcare environment is extremely challenging for a number of reasons. Simulation provides a methodology by which this performance can be objectively assessed, thereby facilitating the delivery of effective, safe and efficient patient care.
    Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 09/2013; 18(6). DOI:10.1016/j.siny.2013.08.010 · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the frequency, distribution of potential etiologies, and survival rates of maternal cardiopulmonary arrest during the hospitalization for delivery in the United States. By using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample during the years 1998 through 2011, the authors obtained weighted estimates of the number of U.S. hospitalizations for delivery complicated by maternal cardiac arrest. Clinical and demographic risk factors, potential etiologies, and outcomes were identified and compared in women with and without cardiac arrest. The authors tested for temporal trends in the occurrence and survival associated with maternal arrest. Cardiac arrest complicated 1 in 12,000 or 8.5 per 100,000 hospitalizations for delivery (99% CI, 7.7 to 9.3 per 100,000). The most common potential etiologies of arrest included hemorrhage, heart failure, amniotic fluid embolism, and sepsis. Among patients with cardiac arrest, 58.9% of patients (99% CI, 54.8 to 63.0%) survived to hospital discharge. Approximately 1 in 12,000 hospitalizations for delivery is complicated by cardiac arrest, most frequently due to hemorrhage, heart failure, amniotic fluid embolism, or sepsis. Survival depends on the underlying etiology of arrest.
    Anesthesiology 04/2014; 120(4):810-8. DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000159 · 6.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To study the effect of a departmental program designed to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) for emergency cesarean section (ECS) for nonreassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) on maternal and neonatal outcome. Study Design A protocol for managing ECS that included documenting precise time-intervals, identification of delaying obstacles and debriefing of each case, was implemented from March 2011. All women who delivered by ECS for NRFHR, as the only indication were included. Detailed information regarding DDI, maternal intraoperative and postoperative complications, and neonatal early outcomes were compared before (period-P1) (−27 months) and after (period 2) (+27 months) program implementation. Results During 54 months of study, 593 ECS DDI were included. Mean DDI decreased at period 2 (12.3 ± 3.8 min, n = 301) compared with period 1 (21.7 ± 9.1 min, n = 292), P < .001. Rate of cord pH ≤7.1 and 5 min Apgar score ≤7 decreased at period 2 compared with period 1, P = .016 and P = .031, respectively. Worse composite neonatal outcome decreased at period 2 compared with period 1, 15.6% vs 32.2%, respectively, P ≥ .001. Composite maternal outcome did not differ between the groups. Worse neonatal outcome was dependent on time period (period 1), odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.27–3.55; P = .004 and on gestational age at delivery, odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.76; P < .001. Conclusion Introduction of a management protocol to shorten DDI in ECS for NRFHR was associated with improved early neonatal outcome without change in maternal complications.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 03/2014; 210(3):224.e1–224.e6. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.007 · 3.97 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
20 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014